Eva Stara
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 54 keywords for Eva Stara in Apple App Store
Eva Stara tracks 54 keywords (3 keywords rank; 51 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 40.8, best rank 18.
Tracked keywords
54
3 ranked • 51 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 18 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: combination
Avg difficulty
40.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.3
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 63.8
pieces
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 63.4
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 105
- 67.7
optimize
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 90
- 67.4
bluetooth
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
Unranked opportunities
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 147
pieces
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 169
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 105
optimize
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 90
bluetooth
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 96
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 141,547 • Major competitors: 2,055
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
using
Total apps: 114,667 • Major competitors: 1,563
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
simple
Total apps: 109,526 • Major competitors: 1,461
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
save
Total apps: 93,506 • Major competitors: 1,629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
see
Total apps: 92,719 • Major competitors: 1,760
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| implemented | 70 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,351 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | 18 | 18 | 7 major competitor apps |
| implement | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,602 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 22 | 19 | 9 major competitor apps |
| implementation | 70 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,136 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | 20 | 20 | 3 major competitor apps |
| easy | 66 | 100 | 53 | 86 141,547 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,055 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,535 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 676 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 93,506 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,629 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,667 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,563 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 21,518 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 309 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,686 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,444 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 34,229 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 376 major competitor apps |
| interface | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 45,335 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 338 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 49,314 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 759 major competitor apps |
| ease | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,610 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 85,355 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,274 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 109,526 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,461 major competitor apps |
| performance | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 28,037 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,163 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 663 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 92,719 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,760 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,417 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 881 major competitor apps |
| pieces | 73 | 100 | 41 | 64 6,851 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,478 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| equipped | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,880 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| optimize | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,854 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 90 major competitor apps |
| going | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 31,005 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 824 major competitor apps |
App Description
The interface is friendly and easy to navigate. It allows the users to set up their pieces of equipment quickly and operate them with just some touches on the
screen.
By means of a Bluetooth connection, you can instantaneously adjust the rates for seeds and fertilisers. Additionally, you can see how the sowing procedure is going (lack of seeds or clogging in the row units, rate monitoring, etc.).
Learn the other advantages:
• It enables to save up to five calibrations for fertiliser.
• It allows you to see the vacuum pressure alerts.
• It manually controls the fertiliser sections and seed row units.
• It is equipped with a seed monitor that follows the performance of the row units.