Wyoming Crop Pests
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 94 keywords for Wyoming Crop Pests in Apple App Store
Wyoming Crop Pests tracks 94 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 93 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 37.8, best rank 97.
Tracked keywords
94
1 ranked • 93 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 97 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: university
Avg difficulty
37.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.1
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 28
- 65.3
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 66.2
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 99
- 67.0
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 67.5
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 196
Unranked opportunities
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 28
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 147
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 99
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 176
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 196
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,347 • Major competitors: 3,800
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
information
Total apps: 121,649 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
available
Total apps: 95,747 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
based
Total apps: 79,330 • Major competitors: 1,056
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
many
Total apps: 76,885 • Major competitors: 1,358
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crops | 70 | 100 | 34 | 49 834 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | 97 | 97 | 25 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 182,347 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,800 major competitor apps |
| online | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 73,709 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,306 major competitor apps |
| contact | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 63,348 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 751 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| institute | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,321 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,804 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 345 major competitor apps |
| food | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,227 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 431 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,830 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 560 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,171 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,446 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,587 competing apps Median installs: 480 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,885 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,358 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,502 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,733 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| aid | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,826 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,422 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 881 major competitor apps |
| much | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 53,393 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 931 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,180 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 984 major competitor apps |
| companion | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,817 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 33,714 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 327 major competitor apps |
| made | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 36,181 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 581 major competitor apps |
| publication | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 1,974 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| useful | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,154 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
App Description
B-1340 is provided in it entirety in PDF format as it is useful publication for producers. Much of the integrated pest management information (IPM) is taken from the 2024 "Midwest Vegetable Production Guide". This is annually updated publication done by 8 midwestern land grant universities and is available as both an online and hard copy publication at: https://mwveguide.org/.
If the crop and pest combination is not covered in the guide then an appropriate land grant university extension bulletin is provided thanks to Utah State Universsity, Colorado State University, Univ. of California-IPM, Oregon State University, University of Idaho, University of Maryland, and the "Pacific Northwest Insect Management" guide.
This application is not an exhaustive in regards to all the possible pests that may plague your crop. If you can't identify your pest with certainty with the app please contact your local extension office or email: insectid@uwyo.edu for assitance. An unusual pest may be new to our state.
The author is grateful to the work of many extension entomologist that have made this work possible. Especially those that have contributed photographs available at: https://www.insectimages.org.
This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2021-70006-35842.
Author: Scott Schell, University of Wyoming Extension Entomology Specialist