Wyoming Crop Pests
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 92 keywords for Wyoming Crop Pests in Apple App Store
Wyoming Crop Pests tracks 92 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 92 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.8, difficulty 35.8.
Tracked keywords
92
0 ranked • 92 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
48.8
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
35.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 78.6
online
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 689
- 74.0
contact
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 358
- 77.6
information
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 572
- 66.3
management
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
online
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 689
contact
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.3 • Competitors: 358
information
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 572
management
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 138
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
many
Total apps: 3,804 • Major competitors: 758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
may
Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| online | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 2,997 competing apps Median installs: 268,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 689 major competitor apps |
| contact | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,869 competing apps Median installs: 241,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 358 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| institute | 56 | 83 | 19 | 24 11 competing apps Median installs: 314,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| management | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| food | 58 | 100 | 52 | 68 985 competing apps Median installs: 270,500 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| combination | 57 | 100 | 38 | 58 357 competing apps Median installs: 273,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| format | 57 | 100 | 37 | 53 231 competing apps Median installs: 251,875 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| upon | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 570 competing apps Median installs: 215,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| aid | 57 | 100 | 33 | 51 179 competing apps Median installs: 194,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| work | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| much | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 241,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 569 major competitor apps |
| please | 58 | 100 | 53 | 78 2,739 competing apps Median installs: 250,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| companion | 58 | 100 | 43 | 61 500 competing apps Median installs: 223,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| guide | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 875 competing apps Median installs: 227,525 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| made | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,627 competing apps Median installs: 257,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 361 major competitor apps |
| publication | 56 | 100 | 24 | 35 35 competing apps Median installs: 211,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| useful | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 522 competing apps Median installs: 207,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 90 major competitor apps |
| done | 58 | 100 | 48 | 62 564 competing apps Median installs: 250,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
App Description
B-1340 is provided in it entirety in PDF format as it is useful publication for producers. Much of the integrated pest management information (IPM) is taken from the 2024 "Midwest Vegetable Production Guide". This is annually updated publication done by 8 midwestern land grant universities and is available as both an online and hard copy publication at: https://mwveguide.org/.
If the crop and pest combination is not covered in the guide then an appropriate land grant university extension bulletin is provided thanks to Utah State Universsity, Colorado State University, Univ. of California-IPM, Oregon State University, University of Idaho, University of Maryland, and the "Pacific Northwest Insect Management" guide.
This application is not an exhaustive in regards to all the possible pests that may plague your crop. If you can't identify your pest with certainty with the app please contact your local extension office or email: insectid@uwyo.edu for assitance. An unusual pest may be new to our state.
The author is grateful to the work of many extension entomologist that have made this work possible. Especially those that have contributed photographs available at: https://www.insectimages.org.
This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2021-70006-35842.
Author: Scott Schell, University of Wyoming Extension Entomology Specialist