TEE Standard Views

Developer: University Health Network

Category: Medical

~400 - 800

8 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 44 keywords for TEE Standard Views in Apple App Store

Developer: University Health Network Category: medical Rating: 3.75

TEE Standard Views tracks 44 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 44 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 52.1, difficulty 38.8.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 44 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

52.1

Top keyword: see

Avg difficulty

38.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

see

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,122
83.3
challenge

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 496
75.5
heart

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 153
63.4
image

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 142
65.6
created

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 153
67.4

Unranked opportunities

see

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Competitors: 1,122
challenge

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 496
heart

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 153
image

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 142
created

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Competitors: 153

High competition keywords

see

Total apps: 4,836 • Major competitors: 1,122

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.7
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
view

Total apps: 3,121 • Major competitors: 667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
go

Total apps: 3,005 • Major competitors: 709

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.2
next

Total apps: 2,294 • Major competitors: 556

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
challenge	58	100	51	75 2,171 competing apps Median installs: 283,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	496 major competitor apps
heart	58	100	47	63 635 competing apps Median installs: 271,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	153 major competitor apps
image	58	100	46	66 796 competing apps Median installs: 225,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	142 major competitor apps
created	58	100	47	67 953 competing apps Median installs: 213,175 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	153 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
menu	57	100	51	58 367 competing apps Median installs: 246,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	88 major competitor apps
function	57	100	38	58 375 competing apps Median installs: 210,150 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	52 major competitor apps
diagnostic	56	100	23	35 36 competing apps Median installs: 178,900 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	3 major competitor apps
view	58	100	60	79 3,121 competing apps Median installs: 254,100 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	667 major competitor apps
part	58	100	54	69 1,154 competing apps Median installs: 268,538 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	247 major competitor apps
see	59	100	65	83 4,836 competing apps Median installs: 287,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,122 major competitor apps
next	58	100	61	76 2,294 competing apps Median installs: 295,162 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	556 major competitor apps
assist	57	100	37	55 258 competing apps Median installs: 232,662 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	43 major competitor apps
structure	57	100	29	40 59 competing apps Median installs: 280,500 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	10 major competitor apps
two	58	100	49	70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	249 major competitor apps
go	58	100	59	79 3,005 competing apps Median installs: 276,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	709 major competitor apps
assessment	20	100	34	40 56 competing apps Median installs: 493,512 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	18 major competitor apps
standard	58	100	43	62 541 competing apps Median installs: 259,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	114 major competitor apps
learning	58	100	51	69 1,113 competing apps Median installs: 233,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	184 major competitor apps
dimensional	56	100	22	35 34 competing apps Median installs: 163,375 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	1 major competitor apps
model	57	100	37	55 260 competing apps Median installs: 255,062 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	53 major competitor apps
corresponding	57	100	41	46 103 competing apps Median installs: 198,900 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	16 major competitor apps
teaching	57	100	41	48 127 competing apps Median installs: 283,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	23 major competitor apps
selected	58	100	47	64 692 competing apps Median installs: 224,725 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	121 major competitor apps
buttons	57	100	33	49 146 competing apps Median installs: 252,250 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	29 major competitor apps

App Description

The primary challenge in learning transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is translating the two dimensional echocardiographic image into a visualization of the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the heart. We have created this application to assist with teaching and learning the assessment of cardiac function with TEE.

Users can view the TEE recordings for each of the 20 standard diagnostic views and see the corresponding 3D model of the heart, the TEE probe, and the ultrasound plane. Each TEE view can be selected from a menu at the left of the screen, or by using arrow buttons to go to the next or previous view in the list. For each TEE view, the 3D model of the heart, probe, ultrasound plane, heart can be rotated in the horizontal or vertical plane to view it from any angle. The part of the heart above the echo plane can be removed, and the heart model can be oriented so the structures correspond to the TEE image.