OpenEvidence
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 77 keywords for OpenEvidence in Apple App Store
OpenEvidence tracks 77 keywords (14 keywords rank; 63 need traction). Key metrics: 36% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.4, difficulty 40.0, best rank 1.
Tracked keywords
77
14 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
36%
Best rank 1 • Latest leader 3
Avg opportunity
69.4
Top keyword: clinical
Avg difficulty
40.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.9
clinical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank 3
Competitors: 26
- 66.8
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank 48
Competitors: 83
- 63.6
decision
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank 133
Competitors: 61
- 67.5
partner
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 175
- 64.6
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 33
Unranked opportunities
partner
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 175
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 33
incredible
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 251
verified
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 103
united
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 308
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 153,385 • Major competitors: 3,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
find
Total apps: 149,900 • Major competitors: 2,796
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
information
Total apps: 121,649 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
available
Total apps: 95,747 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
daily
Total apps: 84,579 • Major competitors: 1,483
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comprehensive collection | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 440 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | 1 | 1 | 2 major competitor apps |
| evidence | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,390 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | 1 | 1 | 24 major competitor apps |
| clinical | 73 | 100 | 38 | 63 6,089 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 3 | 2 | 26 major competitor apps |
| medicine | 72 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,737 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | 6 | 4 | 18 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,735 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 6 | 6 | 143 major competitor apps |
| open | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 41,395 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | 18 | 14 | 736 major competitor apps |
| med | 70 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,098 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | 21 | 21 | 4 major competitor apps |
| opens | 71 | 100 | 36 | 55 2,134 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | 39 | 39 | 34 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,417 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 48 | 48 | 83 major competitor apps |
| helped multiple | 0 | 10 | 3 | 5 1 competing apps | 66 | 66 | 0 major competitor apps |
| update new | 67 | 100 | 22 | 35 130 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 3.9 | 90 | 90 | 2 major competitor apps |
| healthcare professional | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,002 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 129 | 129 | 5 major competitor apps |
| decision | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,689 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | 133 | 133 | 61 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,360 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | 158 | 158 | 1,121 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 55,867 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 43,584 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 541 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,591 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 527 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,175 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 497 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,996 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 60,391 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 953 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 149,900 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,796 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| search | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 61,671 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,465 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 599 major competitor apps |
App Description
OpenEvidence is trusted by hundreds of thousands of verified healthcare professionals to support high-stakes clinical decisions at the point of care with answers that are sourced, cited, and grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature.
OpenEvidence is the fastest-growing and most widely-used clinical decision support platform in the world–used daily, on average, by over 40% of physicians in the United States, spanning more than 10,000 hospitals and medical centers nationwide.
Now sourcing from over 300+ medical journals, as well as the FDA and CDC. OpenEvidence is an official AI partner of The New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of American Medical Association (and their 11 specialty journals), and has content agreements, partnerships and collaborations with:
NCCN
ACC
ADA
ACEP
AAFP
AAOS
AAOHNS and more.
OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.
TESTIMONIALS
“I've been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn't able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School
“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic
“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist
“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist
“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise cur