OpenEvidence
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for OpenEvidence in Apple App Store
OpenEvidence tracks 71 keywords (2 keywords rank; 69 need traction). Key metrics: 50% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 39.6, best rank 5.
Tracked keywords
71
2 ranked • 69 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
50%
Best rank 5 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: healthcare
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.2
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 40
- 66.9
partner
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 92
- 64.0
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 15
- 64.9
incredible
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 68.7
week
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 172
Unranked opportunities
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 40
partner
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 92
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 15
incredible
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 147
week
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 172
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 142,313 • Major competitors: 1,822
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
find
Total apps: 138,227 • Major competitors: 1,545
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
information
Total apps: 111,662 • Major competitors: 587
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
available
Total apps: 88,792 • Major competitors: 1,008
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
daily
Total apps: 74,171 • Major competitors: 860
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| medical | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,155 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | 5 | 5 | 62 major competitor apps |
| open | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,877 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | 19 | 19 | 348 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,380 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 674 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 38,904 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,334 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 73,987 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,144 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 265 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 111,662 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 587 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,662 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,328 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 504 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 52 | 86 138,227 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,545 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 88,792 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,008 major competitor apps |
| search | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 56,576 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 548 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,977 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 43,220 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| power | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 35,313 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 331 major competitor apps |
| partner | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 9,885 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| patient | 73 | 100 | 38 | 64 6,649 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| ai | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 44,542 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 329 major competitor apps |
| official | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,176 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 52 | 86 142,313 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,822 major competitor apps |
| useful | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,842 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,593 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| incredible | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,558 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| professional | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 42,894 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 241 major competitor apps |
App Description
OpenEvidence is trusted by hundreds of thousands of verified healthcare professionals to support high-stakes clinical decisions at the point of care with answers that are sourced, cited, and grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature.
OpenEvidence is the fastest-growing and most widely-used clinical decision support platform in the world–used daily, on average, by over 40% of physicians in the United States, spanning more than 10,000 hospitals and medical centers nationwide.
Now sourcing from over 300+ medical journals, as well as the FDA and CDC. OpenEvidence is an official AI partner of The New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of American Medical Association (and their 11 specialty journals), and has content agreements, partnerships and collaborations with:
NCCN
ACC
ADA
ACEP
AAFP
AAOS
AAOHNS and more.
OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.
TESTIMONIALS
“I've been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn't able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School
“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic
“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist
“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist
“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise cur