OpenEvidence
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 121 keywords for OpenEvidence in Apple App Store
OpenEvidence tracks 121 keywords (2 keywords rank; 119 need traction). Key metrics: 50% top-10 coverage, opportunity 47.5, difficulty 40.3, best rank 5.
Tracked keywords
121
2 ranked • 119 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
50%
Best rank 5 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.5
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
40.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 87.6
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,767
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
like
Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| medical | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 418 competing apps Median installs: 192,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | 5 | 5 | 60 major competitor apps |
| open | 58 | 100 | 54 | 73 1,743 competing apps Median installs: 231,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | 19 | 19 | 328 major competitor apps |
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| level | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,734 competing apps Median installs: 274,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 638 major competitor apps |
| health | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| care | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,236 competing apps Median installs: 259,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| date | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,250 competing apps Median installs: 269,412 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| team | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 57 | 100 | 41 | 57 326 competing apps Median installs: 207,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 792 competing apps Median installs: 240,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 140 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 58 | 100 | 56 | 75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 484 major competitor apps |
| around | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,784 competing apps Median installs: 275,088 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| community | 58 | 100 | 57 | 71 1,438 competing apps Median installs: 263,362 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 336 major competitor apps |
| power | 58 | 100 | 49 | 72 1,466 competing apps Median installs: 253,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 299 major competitor apps |
| ahead | 58 | 100 | 55 | 63 626 competing apps Median installs: 289,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 156 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
App Description
OpenEvidence is the world’s leading medical information platform for health care professionals, providing accurate and efficient answers at the point of care. Every answer on OpenEvidence is always sourced, cited, and grounded in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
Now featuring New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published content, NEJM multimedia content, and NEJM invited review articles authored by the world’s leading clinical experts.
• 160 medical specialties
• 1,000+ diseases and therapeutic areas
• 1m+ medical topics
Trusted by medical professionals at 10,000+ care centers across the United States.
OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.
AS SEEN IN
Forbes: “OpenEvidence Keeps Doctors Up To Date On The Latest Science”
TESTIMONIALS
“I've been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn't able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School
“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic
“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist
“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist
“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise currently found in medicine.” - Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize Laureate (In Memoriam)
“It is light years ahead of the next best medical oriente