Catch of the Day: Search
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 97 keywords for Catch of the Day: Search in Apple App Store
Catch of the Day: Search tracks 97 keywords (2 keywords rank; 95 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 40.1, best rank 106.
Tracked keywords
97
2 ranked • 95 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 106 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: clients
Avg difficulty
40.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.9
clients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 91
- 68.4
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 153
- 66.9
scanning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 181
- 65.9
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 183
- 63.7
moves
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 224
Unranked opportunities
clients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 91
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 153
scanning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 181
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 183
moves
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 224
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 142,187 • Major competitors: 2,810
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
using
Total apps: 114,483 • Major competitors: 2,227
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
different
Total apps: 100,125 • Major competitors: 2,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
play
Total apps: 96,040 • Major competitors: 3,396
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
search
Total apps: 61,725 • Major competitors: 1,303
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fundamental | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | 107 | 106 | 18 major competitor apps |
| perception | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,078 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | 147 | 147 | 17 major competitor apps |
| download | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 142,187 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,810 major competitor apps |
| play | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 96,040 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,396 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 55,925 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,623 major competitor apps |
| focus | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 35,365 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 532 major competitor apps |
| change | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,808 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,123 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,483 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,227 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,401 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 329 major competitor apps |
| option | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,022 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 465 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 22,286 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 437 major competitor apps |
| clients | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,604 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 91 major competitor apps |
| task | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 13,002 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| scanning | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 10,509 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 181 major competitor apps |
| search | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 61,725 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,303 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,139 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,069 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 932 major competitor apps |
| moves | 73 | 100 | 41 | 64 6,789 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 224 major competitor apps |
| post | 72 | 100 | 46 | 69 14,326 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 283 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 45,003 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 910 major competitor apps |
| visual | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,919 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 468 major competitor apps |
| benefit | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 8,984 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 152 major competitor apps |
| screens | 71 | 100 | 35 | 56 2,249 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,718 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 256 major competitor apps |
| players | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 28,350 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,228 major competitor apps |
App Description
Letters and numbers are randomly displayed on the screen. The player scans the screen looking for the three numbers. Play starts with 20-25 targets and foils on the screen and uppercase letters. When the player successfully finds the numbers in less than 10 seconds per screen, the app moves them to lowercase letters and then both upper and lowercase letters. Level 2 has 40-50 targets and foils. Level 3 has 70-80 targets and foils. Level 4 has 100-115 targets and foils.
For visually impaired players, or players with severe disability, there is an option to increase the text size—which significantly reduces the number of items on the screen.
Options include the ability to show rewards after a certain number of screens have been viewed, select fonts of different visual complexity, and change the number of targets—up to seven. Results can be printed or emailed and are saved for download using iTunes.
Rationale: This task is intended for clients in Rancho levels VI and above. Stimuli are randomly presented in all quadrants of the visual field requiring ongoing sustained visual attention, visual search, and discrimination, again drawing upon Luria’s (1973) third functional unit, planning and verification of activity. This game is appropriate for children and adults with Attention Deficit Disorder, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury or Post Concussion Syndrome. The focus is to train sustained attention during a visual perceptual number/letter discrimination task.