Calorie Intake Tracker
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 50 keywords for Calorie Intake Tracker in Apple App Store
Calorie Intake Tracker tracks 50 keywords (2 keywords rank; 48 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 40.0, best rank 22.
Tracked keywords
50
2 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 22 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: weight
Avg difficulty
40.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.1
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 66.8
optimized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 164
- 67.8
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 66.8
experienced
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 127
- 58.4
intake
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.1 • Rank 27
Competitors: 41
Unranked opportunities
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 168
optimized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 164
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 83
experienced
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 127
prioritize
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.9 • Competitors: 30
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
view
Total apps: 97,553 • Major competitors: 1,290
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
allows
Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 658
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
daily
Total apps: 75,222 • Major competitors: 1,463
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
provides
Total apps: 72,728 • Major competitors: 564
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intake | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,092 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.4 | 27 | 22 | 41 major competitor apps |
| simplest | 71 | 100 | 36 | 56 2,292 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 72 | 72 | 34 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| prioritize | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,169 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| food | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,873 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 429 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 26,375 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 511 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 37,010 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 428 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 16,876 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| interface | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 39,818 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 327 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 16,793 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,553 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,290 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 564 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 658 major competitor apps |
| balance | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 13,763 competing apps Median installs: 1,301 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| enter | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 24,021 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 390 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,243 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,753 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| daily activity | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 992 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| platform | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 44,150 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 380 major competitor apps |
| select | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 48,315 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 799 major competitor apps |
| daily | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 75,222 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,463 major competitor apps |
| logging | 72 | 100 | 39 | 63 5,888 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
| custom | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,175 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| optimized | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 9,772 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
App Description
Calorie tracking application designed for users who are proficient in calorie counting and prefer direct input of calorie data.
Features:
Raw calorie input: Enter total calories consumed
Calorie burn logging: Input custom burn amounts or select daily activity levels
Daily calorie balance calculation
Weight logging functionality
Data visualization: View weight trends
App Functionality:
Fitpo allows users to bypass food searches and portion calculations. Users can input their independently calculated calorie totals directly. The app provides a platform for efficient logging and tracking of calorie intake, expenditure, and weight changes.
Fitpo is optimized for users who prioritize speed and simplicity in their calorie and weight tracking process. It provides a streamlined interface for logging and analyzing calorie balance and weight data.
privacy policy: https://mrjohn10.github.io/fitpo/privacy-policy
terms of service: https://mrjohn10.github.io/fitpo/terms-of-service