GFS-MAGGS Analyzer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 125 keywords for GFS-MAGGS Analyzer in Apple App Store
GFS-MAGGS Analyzer tracks 125 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 125 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.2, difficulty 38.5.
Tracked keywords
125
0 ranked • 125 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
48.2
Top keyword: easy
Avg difficulty
38.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.2
easy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,246
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 66.9
focus
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 179
- 73.9
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 400
- 62.0
changes
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
Unranked opportunities
easy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 1,246
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
focus
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 179
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400
changes
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 138
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
easy
Total apps: 5,849 • Major competitors: 1,246
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| finance | 57 | 100 | 38 | 47 125 competing apps Median installs: 315,325 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 57 | 100 | 45 | 56 309 competing apps Median installs: 256,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| focus | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 906 competing apps Median installs: 231,512 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| change | 58 | 100 | 54 | 74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| changes | 58 | 100 | 49 | 62 553 competing apps Median installs: 258,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| easy | 59 | 100 | 59 | 85 5,849 competing apps Median installs: 250,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,246 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| range | 58 | 100 | 48 | 71 1,314 competing apps Median installs: 239,262 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 261 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 56 | 100 | 23 | 35 34 competing apps Median installs: 187,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| scientist | 56 | 100 | 22 | 30 21 competing apps Median installs: 182,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| date | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,250 competing apps Median installs: 269,412 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| manage | 58 | 100 | 59 | 81 3,807 competing apps Median installs: 248,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 774 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| international | 58 | 100 | 53 | 62 549 competing apps Median installs: 271,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| key | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,089 competing apps Median installs: 257,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 58 | 100 | 48 | 72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| various | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 374 major competitor apps |
| error | 57 | 100 | 24 | 37 42 competing apps Median installs: 233,000 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 58 | 100 | 45 | 65 746 competing apps Median installs: 252,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 57 | 100 | 41 | 57 326 competing apps Median installs: 207,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| government | 57 | 100 | 38 | 46 110 competing apps Median installs: 246,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
App Description
## Overview
The GFS-MAGGS (Government Finance Statistics - Main Aggregates and Balances Analysis System) Analyzer is a mobile application designed for in-depth analysis and visualization of International Monetary Fund (IMF) Government Finance Statistics data. Developed by MDYAnalytics under the leadership of Data Scientist Kwaku Damoah, this cutting-edge app brings powerful fiscal analysis tools to users' fingertips.
## Key Features
1. **Comparative Aggregates and Balances Analysis**
- Allows users to compare key fiscal metrics across multiple countries
- Supports analysis of various indicators such as revenue, expenditure, and fiscal balance
- Provides interactive charts and detailed data tables for comprehensive insights
2. **Comparative Trend Analysis**
- Enables users to visualize and analyze fiscal trends over time
- Supports multi-country, multi-indicator comparisons
- Offers flexible date range selection for targeted analysis
3. **Relative Change Analysis**
- Analyzes changes in fiscal metrics relative to a baseline indicator (e.g., GDP)
- Supports three types of analysis: Percentage Change, Relative Difference, and Relative Ratio
- Allows users to focus on specific countries, sectors, and time periods
4. **Dynamic Parameter Selection**
- Intuitive interface for selecting countries, years, sectors, indicators, and units
- Supports multiple selection for comprehensive comparative analysis
5. **Advanced Data Visualization**
- Supports various chart types including line, bar, and area charts
6. **Detailed Data Tables**
- Presents analyzed data in easily digestible tabular format
- Supports sorting and filtering for efficient data exploration
- Complements graphical representations with precise numerical data
7. **Error Handling and User Feedback**
- Robust error handling to manage data inconsistencies or processing issues
- Clear error messages to guide users in troubleshooting or adjusting parameters
## Technical Architecture
1. **Data Management**
- Efficient loading and caching of IMF GFS data
- Implements filtering and grouping mechanisms for quick data retrieval and analysis
## User Experience
1. **Intuitive Navigation**
- Tab-based navigation for easy switching between different analysis