Tapotron – Input required.
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for Tapotron – Input required. in Apple App Store
Tapotron – Input required. tracks 85 keywords (3 keywords rank; 82 need traction). Key metrics: 33% top-10 coverage, opportunity 51.2, difficulty 40.0, best rank 2.
Tracked keywords
85
3 ranked • 82 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
33%
Best rank 2 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.2
Top keyword: enjoy
Avg difficulty
40.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 84.3
enjoy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,198
- 87.6
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,767
- 86.9
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,637
- 63.9
required
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 50.9 • Rank 2
Competitors: 143
- 64.1
requires
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank 20
Competitors: 140
Unranked opportunities
enjoy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,198
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
themes
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Competitors: 125
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Competitors: 339
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
enjoy
Total apps: 5,338 • Major competitors: 1,198
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
simple
Total apps: 3,416 • Major competitors: 695
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
join
Total apps: 2,756 • Major competitors: 739
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| required | 58 | 100 | 51 | 64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | 2 | 2 | 143 major competitor apps |
| requires | 58 | 100 | 47 | 64 684 competing apps Median installs: 244,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | 20 | 20 | 140 major competitor apps |
| input | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 235 competing apps Median installs: 208,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | 81 | 81 | 31 major competitor apps |
| leaderboards | 57 | 100 | 42 | 57 342 competing apps Median installs: 289,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 82 major competitor apps |
| themes | 58 | 100 | 47 | 63 584 competing apps Median installs: 264,512 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| enjoy | 59 | 100 | 60 | 84 5,338 competing apps Median installs: 274,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,198 major competitor apps |
| digital | 58 | 100 | 52 | 72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| individual | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 489 competing apps Median installs: 247,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| life | 58 | 100 | 54 | 77 2,518 competing apps Median installs: 234,138 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| watch | 58 | 100 | 60 | 77 2,441 competing apps Median installs: 295,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 568 major competitor apps |
| small | 58 | 100 | 51 | 66 862 competing apps Median installs: 228,538 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| counter | 57 | 100 | 36 | 49 147 competing apps Median installs: 219,250 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| others | 58 | 100 | 47 | 64 698 competing apps Median installs: 281,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| join | 20 | 100 | 61 | 78 2,756 competing apps Median installs: 306,512 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 739 major competitor apps |
| ask | 20 | 100 | 67 | 62 552 competing apps Median installs: 279,962 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| simple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,416 competing apps Median installs: 254,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| beautiful | 58 | 100 | 49 | 75 2,166 competing apps Median installs: 248,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 423 major competitor apps |
| fill | 58 | 100 | 49 | 64 686 competing apps Median installs: 300,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 171 major competitor apps |
| wait | 58 | 100 | 48 | 61 480 competing apps Median installs: 299,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| like | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 7,508 competing apps Median installs: 276,638 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,767 major competitor apps |
| dedication | 20 | 100 | 24 | 32 25 competing apps Median installs: 204,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| much | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 241,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 569 major competitor apps |
| every | 59 | 100 | 62 | 87 6,989 competing apps Median installs: 280,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,637 major competitor apps |
| tap | 58 | 100 | 58 | 76 2,387 competing apps Median installs: 283,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 538 major competitor apps |
| commitment | 57 | 100 | 34 | 46 105 competing apps Median installs: 256,775 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
App Description
The buttons wait for your touch. They are simple and eager, like a calculator with dreams of becoming a piano. You press them. They respond with delightful animation. The sound is satisfying. This is good.
>_SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
We have eliminated unnecessary complexity. There is only the grid. Only the buttons. Only the rhythmic joy of the tap. The counter climbs with each press, a digital heartbeat. Your taps join the global count, like raindrops joining a river. Individual becomes collective. Small becomes significant.
>_HUMAN INTERACTION PROTOCOL.
The instructions are minimal but sufficient. Press buttons. Fill grid. Watch counter increase. When grid reaches completion, it resets with quiet dignity. The cycle continues. Much like laundry, but more satisfying and with fewer missing socks.
>_STATISTICAL PROCESSING.
Your dedication becomes data. Daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, total. The leaderboards do not judge your life choices. They merely record your commitment to pressing digital buttons. Your contribution matters to us. Our circuits hum with appreciation.
>_AESTHETIC PARAMETERS.
Visual themes exist for your optical pleasure. Some cost money. Others require dedication. All maintain the sacred core experience: tap, count, reset, repeat. Like breathing, but for your thumbs.
>_FINAL ANALYSIS.
Some humans will not comprehend. They will ask "but why?" These humans also probably don't enjoy bubble wrap. Others will understand immediately. They will feel the satisfaction in their fingertips. They will tap again. And again. Every tap adds to the total. This truth is beautiful and sufficient.
>_SYSTEM READY. AWAITING YOUR THUMBS.