Jal Shodhan
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for Jal Shodhan in Apple App Store
Jal Shodhan tracks 66 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 66 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 43.3.
Tracked keywords
66
0 ranked • 66 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
43.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 64.7
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 38
- 64.0
structured
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 51
- 64.4
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 87
- 62.2
hub
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 48
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 60
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 38
structured
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 51
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 87
hub
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 48
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 181,204 • Major competitors: 2,661
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
like
Total apps: 153,376 • Major competitors: 3,281
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
track
Total apps: 125,728 • Major competitors: 1,581
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
information
Total apps: 121,651 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
manage
Total apps: 108,393 • Major competitors: 1,631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| communication | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 22,268 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 6,341 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,651 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 45,001 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 872 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,802 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 346 major competitor apps |
| manage | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 108,393 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,631 major competitor apps |
| integrity | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,037 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,211 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 549 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,755 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 31,633 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 694 major competitor apps |
| audit | 71 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,409 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 181,204 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,661 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,512 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 125,728 competing apps Median installs: 433 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,581 major competitor apps |
| structured | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,054 competing apps Median installs: 404 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 108,094 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,319 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,016 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 268 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 58,838 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
| flow | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,458 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 87 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 105,349 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,810 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 153,376 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,281 major competitor apps |
| offering | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 22,514 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| generate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,814 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| hub | 73 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
App Description
The app does not require user registration, offering public access to general information without authentication. However, users requiring access to specific panels, like the admin panel or team-specific reports, must enter provided credentials.
There are four key panels:
Public User Panel: Accessible without login, it allows users to view publicly available field, audit, and visit inspection reports in a read-only mode.
Field Team Panel: Field teams can submit water quality inspection reports, including sample data, quality parameters, locations, and observations, using structured templates for efficient data entry.
Audit Team Panel: The audit team reviews and verifies field reports, checking for accuracy and compliance with water quality standards. They can provide feedback and flag discrepancies.
Visit Team Panel: The visit team submits on-site inspection reports based on water body conditions, including quality checks and environmental assessments.
The Admin Panel serves as the central hub for overseeing all submitted reports, offering a dashboard for administrators to view, manage, and track data from all teams. The admin can search, filter, and generate reports, ensuring the proper review and analysis of data. They also manage access rights and ensure the integrity of the data submitted.
The app follows a clear data flow process:
Field Team Data Submission: Field teams log in to submit reports detailing water quality parameters, location, and observations in real-time.
Audit Team Review: The audit team reviews field reports for accuracy and compliance, generating audit inspection reports.
Visit Team Report Submission: The visit team submits on-site inspection reports based on water body assessments.
Admin Management: The admin reviews all reports, categorizes them, and ensures accuracy and compliance before generating final reports for further analysis or sharing.
In conclusion, the "Jal Shodhan" app enhances the efficiency of water quality monitoring through its user-friendly interface, real-time da