Flavor Charter
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 62 keywords for Flavor Charter in Apple App Store
Flavor Charter tracks 62 keywords (4 keywords rank; 58 need traction). Key metrics: 50% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.0, difficulty 40.9, best rank 2.
Tracked keywords
62
4 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
50%
Best rank 2 • Latest leader 157
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: taste
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
taste
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank 157
Competitors: 80
- 67.2
research
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
- 63.5
academic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 20
- 66.3
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 113
- 66.7
growing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 165
Unranked opportunities
research
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 114
academic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 20
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 113
growing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 165
require
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 185
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 130,038 • Major competitors: 1,614
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
using
Total apps: 114,568 • Major competitors: 1,550
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
designed
Total apps: 113,897 • Major competitors: 1,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
real
Total apps: 105,349 • Major competitors: 1,810
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
data
Total apps: 97,696 • Major competitors: 1,021
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flavorful | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 434 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 2 | 2 | 6 major competitor apps |
| flavor | 70 | 100 | 34 | 52 1,340 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | 6 | 6 | 21 major competitor apps |
| flavors | 71 | 100 | 34 | 53 1,474 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 11 | 11 | 19 major competitor apps |
| taste | 73 | 100 | 41 | 63 6,324 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | 157 | 130 | 80 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,388 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,123 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,489 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 672 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 52,257 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 718 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,937 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,736 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,897 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,081 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,568 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,550 major competitor apps |
| food | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,236 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,614 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,211 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 549 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 21,519 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 309 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 58,942 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 604 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,787 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 91 major competitor apps |
| open | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 41,413 competing apps Median installs: 609 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 741 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 45,026 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 627 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 105,349 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,810 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 45,224 competing apps Median installs: 515 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 954 major competitor apps |
| world | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 91,957 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,984 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,696 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,021 major competitor apps |
| ongoing | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,847 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| participants | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,966 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
App Description
The app enables users to rate real food items across ten key sensory dimensions—sweet, salty, sour, bitter, savory, fatty, astringent, piquant, aromatic, and texture—using intuitive radar charts. These ratings contribute to a growing research dataset that aims to improve our understanding of flavor perception, individual variability, and how these senses may be affected by cancer treatment, aging, diet, or other medical conditions.
Features:
• Structured taste evaluation protocol based on culinary and biomedical literature
• 36 real-world food items grouped by dominant flavor dimension
• Dynamic radar chart visualizations of flavor profiles
• Secure data handling and data de-identification after submission
This app is intended for participants in an ongoing academic research study. Participation is open to anyone and does not require an invitation. Before using the app, users are asked to review and sign a digital consent form.