ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus

~1.9K - 3.7K
37 ratings
ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 75 keywords for ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus in Apple App Store

Developer: American College of Cardiology Category: medical Rating: 3.22

ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus tracks 75 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 75 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 44.4, difficulty 36.8.

Tracked keywords

75

0  ranked •  75  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

44.4

Top keyword: best

Avg difficulty

36.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • best

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,398

    85.9
  • help

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,236

    85.2
  • change

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 400

    73.9
  • care

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —

    Competitors: 262

    69.9
  • support

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 515

    77.7

Unranked opportunities

  • best

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398

  • help

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236

  • change

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400

  • care

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 262

  • support

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Competitors: 515

High competition keywords

  • best

    Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6

  • help

    Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1

  • using

    Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4

  • based

    Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7

  • build

    Total apps: 2,821 • Major competitors: 600

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
best591006086

6,283 competing apps

Median installs: 272,625

Avg rating: 4.6

1,398

major competitor apps

change581005474

1,855 competing apps

Median installs: 267,450

Avg rating: 4.6

400

major competitor apps

care581004970

1,236 competing apps

Median installs: 259,912

Avg rating: 4.6

262

major competitor apps

support581005678

2,741 competing apps

Median installs: 233,950

Avg rating: 4.6

515

major competitor apps

date581005570

1,250 competing apps

Median installs: 269,412

Avg rating: 4.7

274

major competitor apps

information581005778

2,704 competing apps

Median installs: 252,888

Avg rating: 4.6

572

major competitor apps

management581004666

856 competing apps

Median installs: 221,550

Avg rating: 4.6

138

major competitor apps

using581006183

4,473 competing apps

Median installs: 247,200

Avg rating: 4.6

924

major competitor apps

help591006185

5,873 competing apps

Median installs: 257,100

Avg rating: 4.6

1,236

major competitor apps

patients571003045

99 competing apps

Median installs: 221,425

Avg rating: 4.6

21

major competitor apps

around581006078

2,784 competing apps

Median installs: 275,088

Avg rating: 4.6

645

major competitor apps

patient571003045

94 competing apps

Median installs: 207,600

Avg rating: 4.7

14

major competitor apps

tool581004769

1,134 competing apps

Median installs: 210,275

Avg rating: 4.6

170

major competitor apps

plan581005573

1,690 competing apps

Median installs: 264,238

Avg rating: 4.7

380

major competitor apps

plus201005367

947 competing apps

Median installs: 342,375

Avg rating: 4.6

264

major competitor apps

type581004665

765 competing apps

Median installs: 272,225

Avg rating: 4.6

166

major competitor apps

discussion561003535

34 competing apps

Median installs: 192,038

Avg rating: 4.6

7

major competitor apps

year581004767

918 competing apps

Median installs: 268,412

Avg rating: 4.6

195

major competitor apps

course571004057

329 competing apps

Median installs: 245,150

Avg rating: 4.7

60

major competitor apps

user581005277

2,498 competing apps

Median installs: 242,250

Avg rating: 4.6

453

major competitor apps

feedback581004866

871 competing apps

Median installs: 261,525

Avg rating: 4.6

186

major competitor apps

decision571003349

152 competing apps

Median installs: 197,275

Avg rating: 4.7

30

major competitor apps

assessment201003440

56 competing apps

Median installs: 493,512

Avg rating: 4.6

18

major competitor apps

expert581004964

662 competing apps

Median installs: 275,100

Avg rating: 4.7

159

major competitor apps

guideline0341016

4 competing apps

Median installs: 205,288

Avg rating: 4.6

0

major competitor apps

75 keywords
1 of 3

App Description

This clinical decision support app builds a prevention plan by monitoring 10-year ASCVD risk. The updated ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus uses up to date science and user feedback to help a clinician and patient build a customized risk lowering plan by estimating and monitoring change in 10-year ASCVD risk.
Use the app to:
• Estimate a patient’s initial 10-year ASCVD risk using the pooled cohort equation
• Receive an individualized, risk-based, intervention approach
• Project the impact of specific interventions on a patient’s risk
• Guide clinician-patient discussion around customizing an intervention plan
• Update risk at follow-up based on a patient’s response to therapy using the Million Hearts Longitudinal model
Advice from the app is derived from the 2020 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, the 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, the 2018 ACC/AHA et al. Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol, the 2018 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment, the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk, and the 2016 Million Hearts Longitudinal ASCVD Risk Assessment Tool user guide.
The information and recommendations in this clinical decision support tool are meant to support clinical decision making. They are not meant to represent the only or best course of care or replace clinical judgment. Therapeutic options should be determined after discussion between the patient and their care provider.