ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus

~2.6K - 5.3K
53 ratings
ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 75 keywords for ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus in Apple App Store

Developer: American College of Cardiology Category: medical Rating: 3.13

ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus tracks 75 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 75 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 36.7.

Tracked keywords

75

0  ranked •  75  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: patient

Avg difficulty

36.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • patient

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 13

    64.0
  • course

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 64

    68.2
  • monitoring

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 50

    66.9
  • impact

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 80

    65.2
  • risk

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 46

    64.8

Unranked opportunities

  • patient

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 13

  • course

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 64

  • monitoring

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 50

  • impact

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 80

  • risk

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 46

High competition keywords

  • help

    Total apps: 149,354 • Major competitors: 1,307

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4

  • best

    Total apps: 116,755 • Major competitors: 1,445

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4

  • using

    Total apps: 115,821 • Major competitors: 805

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.2

  • information

    Total apps: 111,770 • Major competitors: 564

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0

  • based

    Total apps: 80,200 • Major competitors: 593

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
best661005185

116,755 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

1,445

major competitor apps

change691004677

38,450 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.1

419

major competitor apps

care701004575

29,383 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

270

major competitor apps

support671004982

74,165 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

552

major competitor apps

date691004777

40,190 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.2

258

major competitor apps

information661005185

111,770 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

564

major competitor apps

management691004777

42,170 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.1

151

major competitor apps

using661005185

115,821 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

805

major competitor apps

help651005287

149,354 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

1,307

major competitor apps

patients721003863

5,427 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.2

18

major competitor apps

around691004879

50,163 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

574

major competitor apps

patient731003864

6,660 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

13

major competitor apps

tool691004778

48,277 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

180

major competitor apps

plan691004677

37,579 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.3

400

major competitor apps

plus721004370

15,026 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.1

276

major competitor apps

type711004473

23,615 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

170

major competitor apps

discussion711003355

1,906 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.3

8

major competitor apps

year721004371

17,820 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

210

major competitor apps

course731004168

11,839 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

64

major competitor apps

user681004981

66,432 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

475

major competitor apps

feedback701004574

27,605 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

189

major competitor apps

decision721003862

5,407 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.2

37

major competitor apps

assessment721003659

3,531 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.1

16

major competitor apps

expert721004270

14,850 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.3

172

major competitor apps

guideline681002541

279 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.2

0

major competitor apps

75 keywords
1 of 3

App Description

This clinical decision support app builds a prevention plan by monitoring 10-year ASCVD risk. The updated ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus uses up to date science and user feedback to help a clinician and patient build a customized risk lowering plan by estimating and monitoring change in 10-year ASCVD risk.
Use the app to:
• Estimate a patient’s initial 10-year ASCVD risk using the pooled cohort equation
• Receive an individualized, risk-based, intervention approach
• Project the impact of specific interventions on a patient’s risk
• Guide clinician-patient discussion around customizing an intervention plan
• Update risk at follow-up based on a patient’s response to therapy using the Million Hearts Longitudinal model
Advice from the app is derived from the 2020 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, the 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, the 2018 ACC/AHA et al. Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol, the 2018 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment, the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk, and the 2016 Million Hearts Longitudinal ASCVD Risk Assessment Tool user guide.
The information and recommendations in this clinical decision support tool are meant to support clinical decision making. They are not meant to represent the only or best course of care or replace clinical judgment. Therapeutic options should be determined after discussion between the patient and their care provider.