ALF Checklist

Developer: Tung Tree LLC

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

100 installs

2.00 ratings

9.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 48 keywords for ALF Checklist in Apple App Store

Developer: Tung Tree LLC Category: medical Rating: 4.5

ALF Checklist tracks 48 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 47 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.7, difficulty 38.3, best rank 35.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 47 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 35 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.7

Top keyword: changes

Avg difficulty

38.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

changes

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 276
68.5
patients

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 43
62.1
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 38
64.6
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 86
68.2
unit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 72
62.6

Unranked opportunities

changes

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 276
patients

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 43
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 38
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 86
unit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 72

High competition keywords

information

Total apps: 121,675 • Major competitors: 1,488

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
designed

Total apps: 113,807 • Major competitors: 1,566

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
daily

Total apps: 84,711 • Major competitors: 2,036

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.1
improve

Total apps: 45,003 • Major competitors: 910

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.8
list

Total apps: 43,630 • Major competitors: 669

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
failure	70	100	33	49 947 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	35	35	22 major competitor apps
changes	73	100	44	69 13,192 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	276 major competitor apps
care	70	100	47	75 32,606 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	700 major competitor apps
medical	71	100	44	72 21,744 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	188 major competitor apps
information	66	100	52	85 121,675 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,488 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	51	84 113,807 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,566 major competitor apps
list	69	100	48	77 43,630 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	669 major competitor apps
group	71	100	49	73 25,669 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	424 major competitor apps
diagnostic	71	100	34	56 2,391 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	15 major competitor apps
patients	73	100	37	62 5,403 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	43 major competitor apps
test	69	100	48	77 42,137 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	963 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	39	65 7,651 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	38 major competitor apps
improve	69	100	48	77 45,003 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	910 major competitor apps
professionals	73	100	41	68 12,628 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	86 major competitor apps
network	71	100	46	74 26,946 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	573 major competitor apps
unit	73	100	38	63 5,796 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	72 major competitor apps
done	73	100	44	67 11,402 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	281 major competitor apps
term	73	100	43	68 11,980 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	249 major competitor apps
daily	67	100	52	82 84,711 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	2,036 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,240 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	212 major competitor apps
recommended	73	100	42	64 7,078 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	142 major competitor apps
status	71	100	47	73 22,950 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	438 major competitor apps
goals	72	100	43	69 14,329 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	296 major competitor apps
associated	73	100	39	64 6,662 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	90 major competitor apps
since	73	100	41	67 11,348 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	186 major competitor apps

App Description

The Acute Liver Failure Checklist app was developed by the Acute Liver Failure Study Group, a NIH-funded cooperative network formed to study this rare and devastating disease, which has enrolled over 2000 patients since 1998.

It is designed for use by medical professionals caring for patients in the intensive care unit with acute liver failure, which is a short-term hepatic illness associated with coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy (mental status changes associated with liver failure).

The goals of this checklist: 1) improve and standardize clinical management, 2) improve diagnostic acumen, and 3) improve patient survival.

Features:
Task list to be done on admission and daily in all cases of acute liver failure

Diagnostic test checklist and recommended therapies

Admission and daily evaluation checklist, categorized by systems

Instructional video

More information can be found at the Acute Liver Failure Study Group website:
http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/labs/acute-liver/