ENCollect for Capital First Ltd.
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 53 keywords for ENCollect for Capital First Ltd. in Apple App Store
ENCollect for Capital First Ltd. tracks 53 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 53 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.2, difficulty 44.7.
Tracked keywords
53
0 ranked • 53 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.2
Top keyword: make
Avg difficulty
44.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 84.1
account
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,073
- 71.3
offline
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 299
- 70.1
collection
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 276
- 79.9
designed
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 624
Unranked opportunities
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
account
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,073
offline
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.4 • Competitors: 299
collection
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 276
designed
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Competitors: 624
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
account
Total apps: 5,212 • Major competitors: 1,073
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 58 | 100 | 54 | 71 1,428 competing apps Median installs: 267,688 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 299 major competitor apps |
| finance | 57 | 100 | 38 | 47 125 competing apps Median installs: 315,325 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| collection | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,259 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 276 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| payment | 58 | 100 | 58 | 78 2,787 competing apps Median installs: 287,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 640 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 57 | 100 | 40 | 56 304 competing apps Median installs: 263,212 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| goal | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 764 competing apps Median installs: 244,162 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| company | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 480 competing apps Median installs: 216,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| process | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| account | 59 | 100 | 61 | 84 5,212 competing apps Median installs: 257,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,073 major competitor apps |
| collected | 57 | 100 | 37 | 49 146 competing apps Median installs: 197,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| appointments | 20 | 100 | 42 | 48 135 competing apps Median installs: 304,050 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| customers | 20 | 100 | 51 | 64 702 competing apps Median installs: 333,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| plan | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,690 competing apps Median installs: 264,238 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 380 major competitor apps |
| integration | 57 | 100 | 37 | 55 260 competing apps Median installs: 268,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| payments | 58 | 100 | 50 | 65 741 competing apps Median installs: 305,425 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 174 major competitor apps |
| feature | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,597 competing apps Median installs: 260,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 352 major competitor apps |
| much | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 241,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 569 major competitor apps |
| check | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,949 competing apps Median installs: 263,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 689 major competitor apps |
| across | 20 | 100 | 63 | 77 2,646 competing apps Median installs: 290,838 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 672 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
App Description
Benefits/Rationale
1. The process of reconciling the payment status across PAN country is much easier, faster and efficient.
2. The collection status on an account number is recorded as it is.
3. Agent/collector can check for his efforts and outstanding amount to be collected at any point of time.
4. Agent/collector can plan his collection schedules, as the data is available on his mobile.
5. Offline data integration feature helps smoothen the process of collections and updates the server automatically.