HeRS - Hemorrhage Risk Stratification Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 38 keywords for HeRS - Hemorrhage Risk Stratification Calculator in Apple App Store
HeRS - Hemorrhage Risk Stratification Calculator tracks 38 keywords (2 keywords rank; 36 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 39.1, best rank 109.
Tracked keywords
38
2 ranked • 36 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 109 • Latest leader 109
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: risk
Avg difficulty
39.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.2
risk
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank 109
Competitors: 128
- 62.1
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 42
- 65.3
continuous
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 133
- 63.8
pieces
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 236
- 65.5
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 131
Unranked opportunities
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 42
continuous
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 133
pieces
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 236
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 131
calculator
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 120
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 130,143 • Major competitors: 2,092
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
using
Total apps: 114,350 • Major competitors: 2,223
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
whether
Total apps: 88,946 • Major competitors: 1,494
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
easily
Total apps: 85,020 • Major competitors: 1,719
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
based
Total apps: 79,110 • Major competitors: 1,402
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| risk | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,396 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | 109 | 109 | 128 major competitor apps |
| stroke | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,227 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | 128 | 128 | 54 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 88,946 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,494 major competitor apps |
| needs | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 25,896 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| valuable | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,526 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 223 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,350 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,223 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,092 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,673 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| patients | 73 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,399 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| continuous | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,480 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 49,169 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,025 major competitor apps |
| provides | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,368 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 808 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 85,020 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,719 major competitor apps |
| transformation | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,424 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| pieces | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,838 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| useful | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,159 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 298 major competitor apps |
| probability | 70 | 100 | 32 | 51 1,094 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| often | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,659 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 131 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 81 79,110 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,402 major competitor apps |
| complex | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 17,235 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| ordinary | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,892 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 80 major competitor apps |
| accurately | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,072 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| calculator | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,391 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| paper | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 10,262 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| variables | 69 | 100 | 28 | 45 540 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
App Description
The HeRS score is a prospectively validated equation based on continuous variables of age, renal function, and stroke size. The equation is complex and cannot be performed easily or quickly with paper or with an ordinary calculator. Determining the probability of hemorrhagic transformation of acute ischemic stroke is clinically useful as risk of hemorrhage often needs to be weighed against risk of recurrent stroke in deciding on whether or not to anticoagulate in the acute clinical setting. The HeRS score provides one of these valuable pieces of data- the likelihood of hemorrhagic transformation. Using the mobile application, the HeRS score can be accurately and easily determined rapidly.