HeRS - Hemorrhage Risk Stratification Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 38 keywords for HeRS - Hemorrhage Risk Stratification Calculator in Apple App Store
HeRS - Hemorrhage Risk Stratification Calculator tracks 38 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 38 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.2, difficulty 38.5.
Tracked keywords
38
0 ranked • 38 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
50.2
Top keyword: whether
Avg difficulty
38.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 79.1
whether
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 715
- 67.0
needs
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 194
- 59.5
valuable
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 71
- 82.6
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 924
- 81.3
mobile
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 60.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 846
Unranked opportunities
whether
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.3 • Competitors: 715
needs
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 194
valuable
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 71
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924
mobile
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 60.2 • Competitors: 846
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
easily
Total apps: 3,352 • Major competitors: 764
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.3
whether
Total apps: 3,139 • Major competitors: 715
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| whether | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 3,139 competing apps Median installs: 267,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 715 major competitor apps |
| needs | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 920 competing apps Median installs: 251,312 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| valuable | 58 | 100 | 41 | 59 426 competing apps Median installs: 221,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 71 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| score | 20 | 100 | 52 | 68 977 competing apps Median installs: 314,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| patients | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| continuous | 57 | 100 | 37 | 52 201 competing apps Median installs: 213,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 58 | 100 | 56 | 75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 484 major competitor apps |
| provides | 58 | 100 | 49 | 74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| easily | 58 | 100 | 61 | 80 3,352 competing apps Median installs: 262,062 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 764 major competitor apps |
| transformation | 57 | 100 | 29 | 43 80 competing apps Median installs: 222,400 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| pieces | 58 | 100 | 44 | 60 438 competing apps Median installs: 308,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| useful | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 522 competing apps Median installs: 207,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 90 major competitor apps |
| probability | 56 | 100 | 28 | 35 36 competing apps Median installs: 213,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| often | 57 | 100 | 38 | 56 296 competing apps Median installs: 226,588 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| complex | 58 | 100 | 41 | 60 442 competing apps Median installs: 209,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| ordinary | 57 | 100 | 34 | 50 157 competing apps Median installs: 211,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| accurately | 57 | 100 | 33 | 50 163 competing apps Median installs: 193,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| calculator | 57 | 100 | 38 | 52 193 competing apps Median installs: 216,900 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| paper | 20 | 100 | 49 | 59 419 competing apps Median installs: 299,075 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| variables | 56 | 100 | 19 | 28 16 competing apps Median installs: 133,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| risk | 57 | 100 | 41 | 53 224 competing apps Median installs: 277,488 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| determining | 56 | 100 | 17 | 27 14 competing apps Median installs: 190,275 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
App Description
The HeRS score is a prospectively validated equation based on continuous variables of age, renal function, and stroke size. The equation is complex and cannot be performed easily or quickly with paper or with an ordinary calculator. Determining the probability of hemorrhagic transformation of acute ischemic stroke is clinically useful as risk of hemorrhage often needs to be weighed against risk of recurrent stroke in deciding on whether or not to anticoagulate in the acute clinical setting. The HeRS score provides one of these valuable pieces of data- the likelihood of hemorrhagic transformation. Using the mobile application, the HeRS score can be accurately and easily determined rapidly.