iDig - Recording Archaeology
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 97 keywords for iDig - Recording Archaeology in Apple App Store
iDig - Recording Archaeology tracks 97 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 96 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 38.5, best rank 147.
Tracked keywords
97
1 ranked • 96 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 147 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
38.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 64.5
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 62.5
stations
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 68.0
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 68.5
reports
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 115
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 60
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 94
stations
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 94
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 95
reports
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 115
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 189,872 • Major competitors: 2,979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
track
Total apps: 125,707 • Major competitors: 1,580
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
using
Total apps: 114,639 • Major competitors: 1,562
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
designed
Total apps: 113,960 • Major competitors: 1,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
simple
Total apps: 109,534 • Major competitors: 1,459
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dig | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,776 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | 147 | 147 | 55 major competitor apps |
| top | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 46,690 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 6,341 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| git | 67 | 100 | 20 | 33 96 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,991 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,646 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 37,881 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 453 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,623 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 52,249 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 719 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,542 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,960 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,562 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 189,872 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,979 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,846 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 404 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 76,382 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,126 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 125,707 competing apps Median installs: 431 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,580 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 49,297 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,502 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 109,534 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,459 major competitor apps |
| contains | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 18,171 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 72,988 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,490 major competitor apps |
| official | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 32,512 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 420 major competitor apps |
| stations | 73 | 100 | 40 | 62 5,718 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 92,680 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,758 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,422 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 881 major competitor apps |
App Description
Other excavations and institutes collaborating in the development of iDig include: American/Greek excavations at the Ismenion sanctuary (Thebes), Corinth Excavations, Belgian/Dutch fieldwork at Thorikos, British excavations at Keros, the Casa della Regina Carolina (CRC) Project at Pompeii, the Eastern Boeotia Archaeological Project at Eleon, the Greek underwater survey in the Argo-Saronic Gulf, the Lechaion Harbor and Settlement Land Project, the Molyvoti (Thrace) Archaeological Project, the Packard Humanities Institute, the Teos Excavation Project of Ankara University, Swiss excavations at Eretria and Amarynthos (Euboia), and the Northwest Bolsena Archaeological Project at Valle Gianni.
iDig is designed to produce digital records in the field and is heavily optimized for excavation workflows.
iDig connects wirelessly to Leica Total Stations and keeps excavation data in sync on multiple iPads, streamlining collaboration during the excavation process.
Using animation, an excavator can see and track data from different perspectives: top plan, cross section, and spatial and temporal matrix layouts.
Scanned drawings and plans can be quickly imported and georeferenced right in the app.
Custom fields can be added and excavation records from previous seasons can be imported and connected to the current work for real-time data integration.
Excavation data can be exported in standard formats from the built-in web server and reports can be saved incrementally using simple URL bookmarks.
An external “iDig Server” application can be used to synchronize and version all excavation data into a standard GIT repository (https://github.com/iDig-Recording-Archaeology/idig-server).
The version of iDig released here contains unpublished data from two trenches excavated in 2013. The formal study of this data will be published in Hesperia, the official journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens (https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/publications/hesperia).