MSUES Southern Pine Thinning

Category: Education

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 63 keywords for MSUES Southern Pine Thinning in Apple App Store

Developer: Mississippi State University Extension Service Category: education Rating: 2.8

MSUES Southern Pine Thinning tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 38.3.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: yet

Avg difficulty

38.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

yet

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 207
68.7
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 114
67.2
entry

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 83
64.5
inventory

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 47
63.9
th

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 98
64.6

Unranked opportunities

yet

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 207
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 114
entry

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 83
inventory

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 47
th

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 98

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
simple

Total apps: 98,968 • Major competitors: 1,441

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
data

Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
allows

Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 658

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
provides

Total apps: 72,728 • Major competitors: 564

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
step	69	100	48	77 37,332 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	630 major competitor apps
graphical	71	100	34	56 2,138 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	11 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
management	69	100	47	77 42,405 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	336 major competitor apps
help	65	100	55	87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,451 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	49	81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	564 major competitor apps
simple	67	100	52	84 98,968 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,441 major competitor apps
yet	73	100	43	69 12,766 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	207 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	50	82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	658 major competitor apps
needed	73	100	42	67 10,337 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	114 major competitor apps
entry	73	100	39	64 7,114 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	83 major competitor apps
guide	70	100	46	75 30,981 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	322 major competitor apps
inventory	73	100	39	64 6,580 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	47 major competitor apps
includes	70	100	47	76 33,776 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	403 major competitor apps
full	68	100	51	81 69,171 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,048 major competitor apps
provided	71	100	44	72 19,097 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	179 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,000 major competitor apps
reports	72	100	42	69 13,259 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	116 major competitor apps
th	73	100	42	65 7,296 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	98 major competitor apps
step guide	68	100	28	43 355 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	5 major competitor apps
well	69	100	48	78 43,947 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	530 major competitor apps
height	71	100	34	55 1,981 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	22 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,327 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	138 major competitor apps
number	69	100	50	78 44,765 competing apps Median installs: 483 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	705 major competitor apps
per	71	100	45	73 22,125 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	382 major competitor apps

App Description

Stand Density Index (SDI) is used to help determine if a pine planation is in need of thinning. Pine Thin uses the average number of trees per acre and the average diameter at breast height (DBH) of trees in your plantation to determine if a thinning is needed. Specific density management diagrams have been developed for each of the four major southern pine species (loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, longleaf pine, and slash pine). Pine Thin provides a graphical depiction of the density of a pine plantation indicating if the stand is in need of thinning (i.e., overstocked) or if thinning is not yet needed (i.e., well-stocked). The line between well stocked and understocked (full site occupancy line) is also provided as a target density for the residual stand that should be left after thinning. If average number of trees per acre and DBH are not known, Pine Thin also allows for the entry of plot data (either 1/10th or 1/100th acre) and will then compute tress per acre, average diameter, and basal area.

Key Features:
- Graphical depiction of pine plantation density
- Indicates graphically if thinning is or is not needed
- Simple timber inventory calculator included
- Inventory data from either 1/10th or 1/100th acre plots
- Reports average trees per acre, diameter, and basal area
- Includes a step by step guide to forest inventory plots