iServe Maruti Suzuki
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 46 keywords for iServe Maruti Suzuki in Google Play
iServe Maruti Suzuki tracks 46 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 46 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 42.5.
Incident Management, Request Fulfillment and Reports
Tracked keywords
46
0 ranked • 46 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: productivity
Avg difficulty
42.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.4
productivity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 438
- 66.0
integration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 382
- 61.2
module
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 131
- 61.5
organizations
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 60.0
configuration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 275
Unranked opportunities
productivity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 438
integration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 382
module
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 131
organizations
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 95
configuration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.2 • Competitors: 275
High competition keywords
manage
Total apps: 182,301 • Major competitors: 7,119
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
provides
Total apps: 167,241 • Major competitors: 5,651
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
user
Total apps: 140,373 • Major competitors: 5,552
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
service
Total apps: 132,432 • Major competitors: 5,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
management
Total apps: 109,412 • Major competitors: 2,581
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 105,034 competing apps Median installs: 2,531 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,890 major competitor apps |
| productivity | 74 | 100 | 48 | 65 12,671 competing apps Median installs: 535 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 438 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 109,412 competing apps Median installs: 566 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,581 major competitor apps |
| manage | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 182,301 competing apps Median installs: 741 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,119 major competitor apps |
| service | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 132,432 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,687 major competitor apps |
| request | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 44,114 competing apps Median installs: 1,132 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,453 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,314 competing apps Median installs: 1,801 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,626 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 89,591 competing apps Median installs: 3,477 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 6,382 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 83,194 competing apps Median installs: 732 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,124 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 167,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,651 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 100,667 competing apps Median installs: 1,886 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,991 major competitor apps |
| integration | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 13,895 competing apps Median installs: 806 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 382 major competitor apps |
| next | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 90,038 competing apps Median installs: 1,805 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,559 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 140,373 competing apps Median installs: 1,991 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,552 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 61 | 79 84,826 competing apps Median installs: 1,690 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,654 major competitor apps |
| delivers | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 21,616 competing apps Median installs: 1,232 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 879 major competitor apps |
| entire | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 45,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,615 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,858 major competitor apps |
| solution | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 77,908 competing apps Median installs: 848 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,907 major competitor apps |
| reports | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 38,142 competing apps Median installs: 791 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 691 major competitor apps |
| generation | 73 | 100 | 43 | 66 14,576 competing apps Median installs: 1,852 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 589 major competitor apps |
| module | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 6,947 competing apps Median installs: 1,046 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 131 major competitor apps |
| levels | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 67,141 competing apps Median installs: 3,776 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,495 major competitor apps |
| incidents | 72 | 100 | 34 | 54 2,610 competing apps Median installs: 878 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| incident | 72 | 100 | 33 | 55 2,638 competing apps Median installs: 943 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| organizations | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 7,160 competing apps Median installs: 643 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
App Description
Incident Management, Request Fulfillment and Reports
Through the tight integration of its Change, Incident, Problem, and Service Request Management processes around a common configuration management database (CMDB), the Service Management sub-module provides IT organizations with a highly efficient, effective, and dynamic mechanism.
Through this organizations can resolve incidents and problems, manage service level agreements (SLAs), and increase end user satisfaction.
