Tile Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 94 keywords for Tile Calculator in Google Play
Tile Calculator tracks 94 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 94 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 45.0.
Tile calculator to estimate tiles, pavers, or planks required to cover an area.
Tracked keywords
94
0 ranked • 94 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: flexibility
Avg difficulty
45.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.5
flexibility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 490
- 66.1
blocks
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,014
- 64.3
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 395
- 61.2
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 361
- 63.0
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 436
Unranked opportunities
flexibility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 490
blocks
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.2 • Competitors: 1,014
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 395
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 361
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 436
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 330,929 • Major competitors: 16,343
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
help
Total apps: 277,741 • Major competitors: 15,480
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed
Total apps: 264,026 • Major competitors: 8,522
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
simple
Total apps: 250,070 • Major competitors: 12,095
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
using
Total apps: 224,372 • Major competitors: 12,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| share | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 213,951 competing apps Median installs: 2,922 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 11,824 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 73,369 competing apps Median installs: 2,364 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,216 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 330,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,439 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 16,343 major competitor apps |
| handle | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,465 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,087 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 164,878 competing apps Median installs: 1,611 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,897 major competitor apps |
| contact | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,568 competing apps Median installs: 1,816 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,237 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 103,865 competing apps Median installs: 1,505 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,133 major competitor apps |
| flexibility | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 11,164 competing apps Median installs: 922 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 490 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,130 competing apps Median installs: 3,080 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,201 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 264,026 competing apps Median installs: 796 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,522 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,372 competing apps Median installs: 2,821 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,284 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 113,803 competing apps Median installs: 1,419 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,667 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 277,741 competing apps Median installs: 2,033 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 15,480 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 114,885 competing apps Median installs: 825 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,490 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 127,263 competing apps Median installs: 2,935 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,860 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 131,047 competing apps Median installs: 2,529 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,704 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 15,456 competing apps Median installs: 3,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,125 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 52,735 competing apps Median installs: 2,170 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,935 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 56,501 competing apps Median installs: 2,173 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,896 major competitor apps |
| surface | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,996 competing apps Median installs: 3,133 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 210 major competitor apps |
| validation | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,210 competing apps Median installs: 926 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,409 competing apps Median installs: 1,205 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,619 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,645 competing apps Median installs: 1,647 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,438 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 218,392 competing apps Median installs: 1,485 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 9,363 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 250,070 competing apps Median installs: 2,080 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,095 major competitor apps |
App Description
Tile calculator to estimate tiles, pavers, or planks required to cover an area.
Following are the key features
• Can easily calculate the number of tiles, planks, paver blocks or any such repeating units to cover an area such as walls or floors.
• Single tile patterns and multiple size tile patterns can be calculated.
• Calculate using any tile size and shapes.
• Support for imperial and metric units.
• Supported length units: Inch, Feet, Yard, Meter, Centimeter (cm), Millimeter (mm). Flexibility to use single unit or combination of any of these six units.
• Supported area units: Square (Inch, Feet, Yard, Centimeter, Millimeter and Meter). Flexibility to use single unit or combination of any of these six units.
• Optional inputs to include: Skirting, Obstacle or opening area, and tile wastage.
• Optional cost estimation.
• Share calculation easily using message, email, Bluetooth, or using other installed apps.
• Auto validation of inputs to prevent common mistakes.
• Built-in help during each calculation process.
For feedback or contact us, please visit our site www.rutheniumalpha.com
