CHA2DS2-VASc HAS-BLED Score Ca
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for CHA2DS2-VASc HAS-BLED Score Ca in Google Play
CHA2DS2-VASc HAS-BLED Score Ca tracks 28 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 28 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.5, difficulty 41.7.
Calculates the risk of stroke and bleeding for patients with atrial fibrillation
Tracked keywords
28
0 ranked • 28 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.5
Top keyword: patients
Avg difficulty
41.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.4
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 194
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 128
- 59.2
calculates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 136
- 60.5
scoring
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 267
- 64.0
visualize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 321
Unranked opportunities
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 194
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 128
calculates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.2 • Competitors: 136
scoring
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 267
visualize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 321
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 284,168 • Major competitors: 15,707
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
level
Total apps: 110,938 • Major competitors: 7,016
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
system
Total apps: 102,204 • Major competitors: 3,919
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
may
Total apps: 87,873 • Major competitors: 4,945
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
essential
Total apps: 52,512 • Major competitors: 1,799
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 46.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 110,938 competing apps Median installs: 2,238 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,016 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 284,168 competing apps Median installs: 2,039 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 15,707 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,398 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 337 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,660 competing apps Median installs: 757 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| year | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 29,156 competing apps Median installs: 4,998 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,544 major competitor apps |
| higher | 72 | 100 | 52 | 69 22,893 competing apps Median installs: 2,822 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,392 major competitor apps |
| assessment | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 7,029 competing apps Median installs: 1,160 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 128 major competitor apps |
| developed | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 51,437 competing apps Median installs: 1,366 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,356 major competitor apps |
| taking | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 34,398 competing apps Median installs: 2,604 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,954 major competitor apps |
| calculates | 74 | 100 | 36 | 59 5,235 competing apps Median installs: 1,530 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| scoring | 74 | 100 | 38 | 61 6,318 competing apps Median installs: 1,250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| visualize | 74 | 100 | 40 | 64 10,445 competing apps Median installs: 947 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 321 major competitor apps |
| calculator | 73 | 100 | 45 | 69 20,587 competing apps Median installs: 1,625 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 739 major competitor apps |
| system | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,204 competing apps Median installs: 1,420 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 3,919 major competitor apps |
| may | 69 | 100 | 58 | 79 87,873 competing apps Median installs: 3,499 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,945 major competitor apps |
| essential | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 52,512 competing apps Median installs: 954 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,799 major competitor apps |
| replace | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 8,665 competing apps Median installs: 4,054 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 570 major competitor apps |
| risk | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 15,549 competing apps Median installs: 1,784 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 711 major competitor apps |
| intended | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 21,059 competing apps Median installs: 1,667 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| major | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 28,241 competing apps Median installs: 3,713 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,613 major competitor apps |
| stroke | 72 | 100 | 37 | 55 2,652 competing apps Median installs: 2,456 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| although | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 4,790 competing apps Median installs: 3,592 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 167 major competitor apps |
| assess | 74 | 100 | 37 | 60 5,813 competing apps Median installs: 732 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| risks | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,201 competing apps Median installs: 1,695 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| scoring system | 70 | 100 | 28 | 45 681 competing apps Median installs: 592 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
App Description
Calculates the risk of stroke and bleeding for patients with atrial fibrillation
HAS-BLED is a scoring system developed to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients taking anticoagulants with atrial fibrillation.
The higher your levels, the higher you are at risk.