iSCOUT Mobile

Developer: Pessl Instruments Ges.m.b.H.

Category: Tools

3.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

+111 weekly installs

trend steady

+142 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 52 keywords for iSCOUT Mobile in Google Play

Developer: Pessl Instruments Ges.m.b.H. Category: tools

iSCOUT Mobile tracks 52 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 52 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 49.6.

Digitize your insect monitoring traps: AI analyzes your phone’s pictures.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 52 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.6

Top keyword: electronic

Avg difficulty

49.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

electronic

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 875
68.6
protection

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,237
67.5
combination

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,101
66.3
applied

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 470
64.1
manual

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 723
66.4

Unranked opportunities

electronic

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 875
protection

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 1,237
combination

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Competitors: 1,101
applied

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 470
manual

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Competitors: 723

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
create

Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
allows

Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
data

Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
manage

Total apps: 61,484 • Major competitors: 6,560

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
collect	69	100	58	78 37,582 competing apps Median installs: 51,160 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	5,908 major competitor apps
users	67	100	60	82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,026 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
control	68	100	59	81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,945 major competitor apps
manage	67	100	62	82 61,484 competing apps Median installs: 27,358 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,560 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
store	69	100	60	78 34,411 competing apps Median installs: 36,549 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	4,003 major competitor apps
virtual	71	100	55	74 20,442 competing apps Median installs: 54,128 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,169 major competitor apps
combination	72	100	49	66 7,537 competing apps Median installs: 45,010 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	1,101 major competitor apps
photos	69	100	68	77 34,126 competing apps Median installs: 44,996 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,901 major competitor apps
trap	69	100	40	49 715 competing apps Median installs: 52,705 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	131 major competitor apps
vision	71	100	41	62 4,244 competing apps Median installs: 22,167 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	377 major competitor apps
create	66	100	69	85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	13,574 major competitor apps
ai	71	100	72	73 19,033 competing apps Median installs: 39,188 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,628 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	58	84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	7,086 major competitor apps
applied	72	100	46	64 5,675 competing apps Median installs: 30,682 Avg rating: 3.4	—	—	470 major competitor apps
manual	72	100	52	66 7,724 competing apps Median installs: 28,082 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	723 major competitor apps
user	67	100	60	82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	4,926 major competitor apps
coming	72	100	52	69 11,262 competing apps Median installs: 40,984 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,487 major competitor apps
photo	69	100	61	77 34,145 competing apps Median installs: 46,300 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,035 major competitor apps
optimize	72	100	48	66 6,817 competing apps Median installs: 24,096 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	677 major competitor apps
data	67	100	65	83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps
remote	72	100	51	69 11,381 competing apps Median installs: 30,710 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,098 major competitor apps
monitoring	72	100	43	67 8,516 competing apps Median installs: 19,576 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	545 major competitor apps
algorithm	71	100	42	59 2,959 competing apps Median installs: 39,979 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	323 major competitor apps

App Description

Digitize your insect monitoring traps: AI analyzes your phone’s pictures.

The iSCOUT mobile app allows users to analyze and store photos of the sticky plates used for insect monitoring. The user can create and manage virtual traps associated with the manual traps distributed in the fields, to collect his photos of the trap glue boards. A computer vision algorithm applied to the photo identifies, categorizes and counts the insects. Resulting data are visualized in charts and can be exported for further analysis.
The app also shows photo and detection results coming from electronic traps iSCOUT. The users can optimize their own insect monitoring and protection strategy, thanks to the combination of remote electronic control and manual, but digitized, experience.