Monitora Oeste
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 43 keywords for Monitora Oeste in Google Play
Monitora Oeste tracks 43 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 43 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 43.3.
Application for monitoring the occurrence of pests in cotton and soybeans.
Tracked keywords
43
0 ranked • 43 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: monitoring
Avg difficulty
43.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.2
monitoring
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 545
- 67.2
result
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 744
- 65.3
recorded
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 541
- 65.5
presented
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 458
- 63.0
region
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 383
Unranked opportunities
monitoring
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 545
result
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 744
recorded
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Competitors: 541
presented
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 458
region
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.4 • Competitors: 383
High competition keywords
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
images
Total apps: 37,077 • Major competitors: 3,614
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| images | 69 | 100 | 59 | 78 37,077 competing apps Median installs: 30,933 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,614 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| tables | 71 | 100 | 44 | 58 2,619 competing apps Median installs: 34,612 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 286 major competitor apps |
| brings | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 27,356 competing apps Median installs: 33,047 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,190 major competitor apps |
| municipality | 69 | 100 | 31 | 50 888 competing apps Median installs: 10,494 Avg rating: 1.3 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| crops | 70 | 100 | 45 | 53 1,193 competing apps Median installs: 82,995 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| satellite | 71 | 100 | 42 | 58 2,646 competing apps Median installs: 45,810 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 361 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 62 | 87 125,665 competing apps Median installs: 38,364 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,037 major competitor apps |
| includes | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 33,489 competing apps Median installs: 30,818 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,100 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 26,003 competing apps Median installs: 32,925 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,321 major competitor apps |
| west | 71 | 100 | 41 | 58 2,631 competing apps Median installs: 28,753 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| monitoring | 72 | 100 | 43 | 67 8,516 competing apps Median installs: 19,576 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 545 major competitor apps |
| graphs | 70 | 100 | 37 | 56 1,987 competing apps Median installs: 36,667 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 63 | 82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,592 major competitor apps |
| result | 72 | 100 | 45 | 67 8,575 competing apps Median installs: 28,681 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 744 major competitor apps |
| form | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,937 competing apps Median installs: 35,119 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,904 major competitor apps |
| indicators | 70 | 100 | 37 | 55 1,723 competing apps Median installs: 30,135 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 149 major competitor apps |
| plants | 70 | 100 | 74 | 56 2,012 competing apps Median installs: 32,632 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 238 major competitor apps |
| recorded | 72 | 100 | 47 | 65 6,650 competing apps Median installs: 27,192 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 541 major competitor apps |
| presented | 72 | 100 | 42 | 66 6,838 competing apps Median installs: 28,569 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 458 major competitor apps |
| technicians | 69 | 100 | 31 | 50 832 competing apps Median installs: 11,420 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 20 major competitor apps |
| region | 72 | 100 | 50 | 63 4,836 competing apps Median installs: 22,798 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| days | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,863 competing apps Median installs: 40,314 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,145 major competitor apps |
| far | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 6,862 competing apps Median installs: 35,848 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 852 major competitor apps |
App Description
Application for monitoring the occurrence of pests in cotton and soybeans.
Phytosanitary information includes climate favorability and occurrences recorded by technicians in the region in plants and spore traps for Asian soybean rust and cotton ramularia spot. Data are presented in maps, tables and graphs according to the municipality or regional nuclei.
The agrometeorological indicators are presented in the form of heat maps, in which the five indices – Albedo, Biomass, Evapotranspiration and NDVI – are estimated every 14 days based on meteorological data and satellite images