SFTP Server s0 v1
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for SFTP Server s0 v1 in Google Play
SFTP Server s0 v1 tracks 66 keywords (2 keywords rank; 64 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.3, difficulty 46.1, best rank 6.
Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Server App
Tracked keywords
66
2 ranked • 64 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 6 • Latest leader 6
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: server
Avg difficulty
46.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.0
server
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Rank 6
Competitors: 769
- 59.8
servers
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank 8
Competitors: 467
- 66.0
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 357
- 65.3
covering
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 363
- 61.2
tested
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 403
Unranked opportunities
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 357
covering
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 363
tested
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 403
least
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Competitors: 868
rd
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 416
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
offers
Total apps: 195,234 • Major competitors: 7,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
different
Total apps: 187,624 • Major competitors: 13,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
based
Total apps: 152,098 • Major competitors: 5,361
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
android
Total apps: 122,139 • Major competitors: 7,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| server | 74 | 100 | 44 | 65 12,133 competing apps Median installs: 4,334 Avg rating: 2.2 | 6 | 6 | 769 major competitor apps |
| servers | 74 | 100 | 42 | 60 5,727 competing apps Median installs: 9,708 Avg rating: 2.4 | 8 | 8 | 467 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 109,650 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,423 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 56,934 competing apps Median installs: 3,726 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,126 major competitor apps |
| party | 72 | 100 | 55 | 70 25,082 competing apps Median installs: 4,774 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 59 | 70 24,796 competing apps Median installs: 3,098 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,732 major competitor apps |
| secure | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 106,277 competing apps Median installs: 754 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,226 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 60 | 71 29,017 competing apps Median installs: 4,380 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,188 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 43,001 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,671 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 63,825 competing apps Median installs: 2,077 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,975 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| api | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 14,026 competing apps Median installs: 409 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 357 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,316 competing apps Median installs: 1,103 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,380 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,550 competing apps Median installs: 2,839 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,098 major competitor apps |
| document | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 17,753 competing apps Median installs: 848 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 785 major competitor apps |
| duck | 71 | 100 | 34 | 48 1,106 competing apps Median installs: 3,655 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 53,362 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,595 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,165 competing apps Median installs: 2,826 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,083 major competitor apps |
| network | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 53,422 competing apps Median installs: 2,006 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,777 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 187,624 competing apps Median installs: 4,008 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 13,693 major competitor apps |
| automatic | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 40,612 competing apps Median installs: 1,988 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,003 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,432 competing apps Median installs: 3,277 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,874 major competitor apps |
| transfer | 72 | 100 | 53 | 71 27,784 competing apps Median installs: 3,070 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,782 major competitor apps |
| requires | 71 | 100 | 49 | 71 30,683 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,407 major competitor apps |
| preference | 72 | 100 | 35 | 53 2,075 competing apps Median installs: 3,510 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
App Description
Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Server App
*)Mounting of drives (document providers) & directories using Android Scoped Storage requires at least Android Version 5.0 “Lollipop” (API Level 21)
SFTP Server s0 v1 offers automatic public key handling according to preference settings.
SFTP Server s0 v1 has been tested and is working well with different SFTP Client applications like: SSHFS (network file-system, mount for: Linux, Mac, Windows), GIO/GVfs (virtual file-system, mount for: Linux), SFTP (Linux-Client, Windows/Cygwin), FileZilla (Windows-, Mac-, Linux-Client), WinSCP (Windows-Client), PSFTP (Putty SFTP, Windows-Shell), Cyberduck (Windows- & Mac-Client), Mountain Duck (Windows- & Mac-Client), Total Commander SFTP Plugin (Windows-Client).
SFTP Server s0 v1 is purely Java based (no 3rd party and native libraries) and therefore portable on different platforms and operating systems.
SFTP Server s0 v1 is based on the following RFC Specifications: “SSH File Transfer Protocol Version 3”, “The Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Architecture”, “The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol”, “The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol” and “The Secure Shell (SSH) Connection Protocol”.
