ABCedeti 2.0
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 86 keywords for ABCedeti 2.0 in Google Play
ABCedeti 2.0 tracks 86 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 86 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 42.9.
Evaluation of initial reading skills
Tracked keywords
86
0 ranked • 86 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: vision
Avg difficulty
42.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.1
vision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 394
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 266
- 63.2
playful
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 652
- 64.0
schools
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 63.3
turning
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 658
Unranked opportunities
vision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 394
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 266
playful
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 652
schools
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 147
turning
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 658
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 367,454 • Major competitors: 23,526
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
experience
Total apps: 294,043 • Major competitors: 17,055
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
designed
Total apps: 259,915 • Major competitors: 8,468
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
different
Total apps: 188,762 • Major competitors: 15,094
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
allows
Total apps: 177,150 • Major competitors: 6,464
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 59 | 89 367,454 competing apps Median installs: 3,179 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 23,526 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 110,874 competing apps Median installs: 2,238 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,012 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 57,146 competing apps Median installs: 4,943 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,388 major competitor apps |
| environment | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,223 competing apps Median installs: 2,205 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 2,106 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 57 | 87 294,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,738 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 17,055 major competitor apps |
| words | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,433 competing apps Median installs: 4,887 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,973 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,999 competing apps Median installs: 1,795 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,518 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 125,764 competing apps Median installs: 892 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,635 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 100,448 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,929 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,786 competing apps Median installs: 3,168 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,082 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 259,915 competing apps Median installs: 857 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,468 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,238 competing apps Median installs: 1,292 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,531 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 61,278 competing apps Median installs: 1,129 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,168 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,025 competing apps Median installs: 1,005 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,936 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,592 competing apps Median installs: 439 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 353 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 52,024 competing apps Median installs: 4,131 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,012 major competitor apps |
| vision | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,296 competing apps Median installs: 932 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 394 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 98,002 competing apps Median installs: 2,188 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,377 major competitor apps |
| students | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 58,369 competing apps Median installs: 1,026 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 729 major competitor apps |
| skills | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 80,882 competing apps Median installs: 4,730 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,169 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 165,147 competing apps Median installs: 1,467 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,563 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,912 competing apps Median installs: 3,177 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 643 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,305 competing apps Median installs: 473 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 396 major competitor apps |
| second | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 24,435 competing apps Median installs: 2,428 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,213 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,150 competing apps Median installs: 1,475 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,464 major competitor apps |
App Description
Evaluation of initial reading skills
The test is made up of 19 subtests organized into different dimensions of the reading process, such as naming speed, phonological awareness, the alphabetic principle, grapheme recognition, reading of words and pseudowords, reading efficiency and comprehension, both oral and written. Its design allows it to be adapted to the student's course or to use a personalized modality, which is especially useful in cases where learning difficulties are detected.
ABCedeti 2.0 was designed under an invisible evaluation approach, in a digital environment that favors the active participation of students. The application can be used by educational professionals such as psychologists, educators, educational psychologists and speech therapists, who can select the most appropriate subtests according to the needs of each student.
The total duration of the evaluation varies between 25 and 35 minutes, depending on the course and the number of subtests applied. Upon completion, a report can be generated that provides a clear vision of the level of development of reading skills, facilitating pedagogical decision-making.
This version has been standardized with the Chilean population and has updated standards. The standardization process was carried out with a sample of students from different socioeconomic levels and schools in the Metropolitan Region, which guarantees the reliability of the results.
