Carrier Landing HD
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 162 keywords for Carrier Landing HD in Google Play
Carrier Landing HD tracks 162 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 162 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 43.2.
Fighter Flight Sim
Tracked keywords
162
0 ranked • 162 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: roll
Avg difficulty
43.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.7
roll
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 588
- 59.6
gun
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,156
- 63.7
presence
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 298
- 63.0
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 428
- 63.1
fly
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,008
Unranked opportunities
roll
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 588
gun
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 1,156
presence
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 298
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 428
fly
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Competitors: 1,008
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,391 • Major competitors: 11,045
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
features
Total apps: 250,296 • Major competitors: 15,009
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.1
using
Total apps: 224,230 • Major competitors: 12,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
without
Total apps: 213,904 • Major competitors: 11,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
offers
Total apps: 199,428 • Major competitors: 8,433
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| challenging | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 53,434 competing apps Median installs: 5,016 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,086 major competitor apps |
| commands | 73 | 100 | 40 | 55 2,858 competing apps Median installs: 3,774 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| whether | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 194,862 competing apps Median installs: 946 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,802 major competitor apps |
| environment | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,316 competing apps Median installs: 2,175 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,088 major competitor apps |
| strictly | 73 | 100 | 36 | 57 3,639 competing apps Median installs: 5,344 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,104 competing apps Median installs: 3,078 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,201 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 133,318 competing apps Median installs: 1,825 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,411 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,230 competing apps Median installs: 2,814 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,284 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 194,667 competing apps Median installs: 2,768 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 10,389 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,391 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,045 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 49,649 competing apps Median installs: 3,218 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,258 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,961 competing apps Median installs: 993 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,905 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 127,282 competing apps Median installs: 2,937 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,860 major competitor apps |
| roll | 74 | 100 | 51 | 62 7,426 competing apps Median installs: 3,585 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 588 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 53 | 76 56,136 competing apps Median installs: 4,887 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,816 major competitor apps |
| gun | 74 | 100 | 47 | 60 5,445 competing apps Median installs: 59,988 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,156 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,321 competing apps Median installs: 1,802 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,626 major competitor apps |
| surface | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,996 competing apps Median installs: 3,133 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 210 major competitor apps |
| series | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 26,136 competing apps Median installs: 6,040 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,940 major competitor apps |
| bullet | 72 | 100 | 38 | 53 2,051 competing apps Median installs: 6,996 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 197,884 competing apps Median installs: 3,067 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 14,343 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 180,212 competing apps Median installs: 912 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,138 major competitor apps |
| angle | 73 | 100 | 38 | 57 3,885 competing apps Median installs: 5,162 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 291 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 166,706 competing apps Median installs: 5,272 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 11,812 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 167,111 competing apps Median installs: 1,405 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,620 major competitor apps |
App Description
Fighter Flight Sim
Aerodynamics:
The aerodynamic model of each aircraft includes multiple components, with careful calculations of their inflow. As a result, the simulator realistically simulates the unique aerodynamic characteristics of many aircraft. This includes the high angle of attack maneuverability of F18 and F22, the ability of F14 to perform a full turn roll using only rudder, the pedal turn maneuver of F35 and F22, and the cobra maneuver of the Su series aerodynamic layout aircraft. The development process involved real pilots for testing and feedback.
Dynamics:
When a 40,000-pound carrier-based aircraft lands on the deck at a descent rate of 5 meters per second, the compression rebound of the landing gear and the damping of the suspension are finely adjusted to create the most realistic visual effects. The recoil force from each bullet is accurately calculated and applied to the aircraft. The simulator also implements rope dynamics simulations for arresting cables and aerial tanker refueling tubes, details that are often not found in many PC flight sims.
Flight Control System (FCS):
Modern fighters often utilize static instability layouts, making it challenging for pilots to fly without the intervention of FCS. The simulator implements an FCS component with the same algorithm as the real flight controller. Your control commands first enter the FCS, which calculates the result using angular velocity feedback or G-load feedback. The result is then passed to the servo to control the control surface.
Avionics:
The simulator implements a HUD based on the real HUD principle. The size and view angle of the HUD characters and symbols have been strictly verified against the HUD of corresponding real aircraft. This offers the most realistic HUD implementation available in the mobile market. The F18 currently features a fully-featured fire control radar, and fire control radars for other aircraft are also under development.
Arms:
Each missile in the simulator utilizes a real dynamic model, treating them as tiny aircraft. The guidance algorithm employs the same APN algorithm used in real missiles. The guidance results are transmitted to the missile's FCS, which then controls the control surface deflection for maneuvering. The initial speed of the gun bullet in the simulator strictly adheres to real data, accurately calculating the bullet's movement in each frame considering the effects of gravity and air resistance.
Earth Environment Rendering:
The simulator employs multiple scattering algorithms to calculate the color of the sky, ground, and objects, thanks to innovative optimization algorithms. It provides realistic sky colors at dusk and dynamic projections of the earth in the atmosphere. Whether flying at foggy sea levels or 50,000 feet high, you can genuinely feel the presence of the air.Additionally, the game utilizes real astronomical data to determine the positions of stars, the moon, and the sun.
