Carrier Landing HD
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 162 keywords for Carrier Landing HD in Google Play
Carrier Landing HD tracks 162 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 162 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 68.6, difficulty 47.2.
Fighter Flight Sim
Tracked keywords
162
0 ranked • 162 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
68.6
Top keyword: calculate
Avg difficulty
47.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.2
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 742
- 67.6
air
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,351
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 68.3
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 877
- 70.9
environment
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,983
Unranked opportunities
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 742
air
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 1,351
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 877
environment
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 1,983
High competition keywords
features
Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| challenging | 70 | 100 | 57 | 76 27,379 competing apps Median installs: 61,738 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,888 major competitor apps |
| commands | 70 | 100 | 46 | 55 1,550 competing apps Median installs: 37,022 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| environment | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 14,040 competing apps Median installs: 47,768 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,983 major competitor apps |
| strictly | 70 | 100 | 39 | 56 1,953 competing apps Median installs: 48,887 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 227 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,945 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,875 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,128 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| roll | 71 | 100 | 64 | 61 3,595 competing apps Median installs: 42,321 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 568 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 60 | 76 28,360 competing apps Median installs: 55,734 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,571 major competitor apps |
| gun | 20 | 100 | 52 | 62 4,044 competing apps Median installs: 169,065 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,119 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 18,485 competing apps Median installs: 37,329 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,447 major competitor apps |
| surface | 70 | 100 | 39 | 56 1,875 competing apps Median installs: 37,877 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 188 major competitor apps |
| series | 72 | 100 | 53 | 71 14,526 competing apps Median installs: 43,250 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,895 major competitor apps |
| bullet | 70 | 100 | 41 | 52 1,111 competing apps Median installs: 84,265 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 214 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 63,400 competing apps Median installs: 25,686 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,690 major competitor apps |
| angle | 70 | 100 | 41 | 57 2,052 competing apps Median installs: 47,046 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 282 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
App Description
Fighter Flight Sim
Aerodynamics:
The aerodynamic model of each aircraft includes multiple components, with careful calculations of their inflow. As a result, the simulator realistically simulates the unique aerodynamic characteristics of many aircraft. This includes the high angle of attack maneuverability of F18 and F22, the ability of F14 to perform a full turn roll using only rudder, the pedal turn maneuver of F35 and F22, and the cobra maneuver of the Su series aerodynamic layout aircraft. The development process involved real pilots for testing and feedback.
Dynamics:
When a 40,000-pound carrier-based aircraft lands on the deck at a descent rate of 5 meters per second, the compression rebound of the landing gear and the damping of the suspension are finely adjusted to create the most realistic visual effects. The recoil force from each bullet is accurately calculated and applied to the aircraft. The simulator also implements rope dynamics simulations for arresting cables and aerial tanker refueling tubes, details that are often not found in many PC flight sims.
Flight Control System (FCS):
Modern fighters often utilize static instability layouts, making it challenging for pilots to fly without the intervention of FCS. The simulator implements an FCS component with the same algorithm as the real flight controller. Your control commands first enter the FCS, which calculates the result using angular velocity feedback or G-load feedback. The result is then passed to the servo to control the control surface.
Avionics:
The simulator implements a HUD based on the real HUD principle. The size and view angle of the HUD characters and symbols have been strictly verified against the HUD of corresponding real aircraft. This offers the most realistic HUD implementation available in the mobile market. The F18 currently features a fully-featured fire control radar, and fire control radars for other aircraft are also under development.
Arms:
Each missile in the simulator utilizes a real dynamic model, treating them as tiny aircraft. The guidance algorithm employs the same APN algorithm used in real missiles. The guidance results are transmitted to the missile's FCS, which then controls the control surface deflection for maneuvering. The initial speed of the gun bullet in the simulator strictly adheres to real data, accurately calculating the bullet's movement in each frame considering the effects of gravity and air resistance.
Earth Environment Rendering:
The simulator employs multiple scattering algorithms to calculate the color of the sky, ground, and objects, thanks to innovative optimization algorithms. It provides realistic sky colors at dusk and dynamic projections of the earth in the atmosphere. Whether flying at foggy sea levels or 50,000 feet high, you can genuinely feel the presence of the air.Additionally, the game utilizes real astronomical data to determine the positions of stars, the moon, and the sun.
AppGoblin