Compare Flow
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for Compare Flow in Google Play
Compare Flow tracks 28 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 27 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.5, difficulty 40.9, best rank 3.
Compare sewer flow capacity with Manning’s Formula across pipe types.
Tracked keywords
28
1 ranked • 27 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 3 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.5
Top keyword: flow
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 540
- 63.8
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 587
- 65.8
box
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 894
- 63.0
evaluate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 63.5
sections
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 302
Unranked opportunities
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 540
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 587
box
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 894
evaluate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 176
sections
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 302
High competition keywords
order
Total apps: 142,712 • Major competitors: 4,319
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
various
Total apps: 139,337 • Major competitors: 8,665
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
including
Total apps: 128,934 • Major competitors: 7,557
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
across
Total apps: 83,177 • Major competitors: 4,506
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
possible
Total apps: 50,322 • Major competitors: 2,381
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compare | 72 | 100 | 46 | 69 20,851 competing apps Median installs: 2,722 Avg rating: 4.1 | 3 | 3 | 1,267 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 142,712 competing apps Median installs: 564 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,319 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 128,934 competing apps Median installs: 2,591 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,557 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 139,337 competing apps Median installs: 3,301 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,665 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,804 competing apps Median installs: 2,796 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,943 major competitor apps |
| flow | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,545 competing apps Median installs: 1,333 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 540 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 60 | 78 83,177 competing apps Median installs: 1,779 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,506 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,131 competing apps Median installs: 2,176 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 587 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 50,322 competing apps Median installs: 2,422 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,381 major competitor apps |
| box | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 13,685 competing apps Median installs: 3,495 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 894 major competitor apps |
| uses | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 37,528 competing apps Median installs: 3,050 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,928 major competitor apps |
| evaluate | 74 | 100 | 38 | 63 9,127 competing apps Median installs: 2,600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| pipe | 71 | 100 | 35 | 49 1,259 competing apps Median installs: 2,096 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 85 major competitor apps |
| sections | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 9,769 competing apps Median installs: 2,307 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| capacity | 73 | 100 | 37 | 58 4,393 competing apps Median installs: 2,169 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 178 major competitor apps |
| metal | 73 | 100 | 38 | 57 3,922 competing apps Median installs: 3,308 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 273 major competitor apps |
| either | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 16,845 competing apps Median installs: 3,655 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 886 major competitor apps |
| arch | 68 | 100 | 25 | 36 187 competing apps Median installs: 1,140 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| evaluating | 74 | 100 | 36 | 59 5,254 competing apps Median installs: 1,165 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| concrete | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,154 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| formula | 73 | 100 | 41 | 57 3,559 competing apps Median installs: 4,290 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 222 major competitor apps |
| accepted | 73 | 100 | 35 | 55 2,908 competing apps Median installs: 2,767 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| geometry | 71 | 100 | 42 | 49 1,227 competing apps Median installs: 2,952 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 79 major competitor apps |
| circular | 73 | 100 | 35 | 55 2,908 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| widely | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 4,773 competing apps Median installs: 3,629 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
App Description
Compare sewer flow capacity with Manning’s Formula across pipe types.
In order to evaluate possible alternatives in either pipe geometry or material, use this app to compare the hydraulic flow capacity among various concrete pipes including circular, elliptical, arch and box sections with circular thermoplastic and corrugated metal pipes.