Compare Flow
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for Compare Flow in Google Play
Compare Flow tracks 28 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 27 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.6, difficulty 40.9, best rank 4.
Compare sewer flow capacity with Manning’s Formula across pipe types.
Tracked keywords
28
1 ranked • 27 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 4 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.6
Top keyword: flow
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.6
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 526
- 63.6
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 580
- 65.8
box
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 883
- 63.2
evaluate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 180
- 63.6
sections
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 305
Unranked opportunities
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 526
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 580
box
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 883
evaluate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 180
sections
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 305
High competition keywords
order
Total apps: 140,997 • Major competitors: 4,309
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.7
various
Total apps: 140,306 • Major competitors: 8,758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
including
Total apps: 130,184 • Major competitors: 7,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
across
Total apps: 84,092 • Major competitors: 4,568
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
possible
Total apps: 49,966 • Major competitors: 2,368
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compare | 73 | 100 | 46 | 69 20,249 competing apps Median installs: 2,881 Avg rating: 2.5 | 4 | 4 | 1,256 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 140,997 competing apps Median installs: 579 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,309 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 130,184 competing apps Median installs: 2,671 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,667 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 140,306 competing apps Median installs: 3,358 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 8,758 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,072 competing apps Median installs: 2,844 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,973 major competitor apps |
| flow | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,168 competing apps Median installs: 1,340 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 526 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 62 | 78 84,092 competing apps Median installs: 1,807 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,568 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 9,750 competing apps Median installs: 2,267 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 49,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,455 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,368 major competitor apps |
| box | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 13,508 competing apps Median installs: 3,603 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 883 major competitor apps |
| uses | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 37,923 competing apps Median installs: 3,068 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,954 major competitor apps |
| evaluate | 74 | 100 | 38 | 63 9,220 competing apps Median installs: 2,683 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| pipe | 71 | 100 | 35 | 49 1,234 competing apps Median installs: 2,032 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 82 major competitor apps |
| sections | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 9,843 competing apps Median installs: 2,292 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| capacity | 73 | 100 | 37 | 58 4,324 competing apps Median installs: 2,288 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| metal | 73 | 100 | 38 | 57 3,862 competing apps Median installs: 3,462 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| either | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 16,953 competing apps Median installs: 3,671 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 896 major competitor apps |
| arch | 68 | 100 | 25 | 36 187 competing apps Median installs: 1,106 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| evaluating | 74 | 100 | 36 | 59 5,283 competing apps Median installs: 1,156 Avg rating: 1.2 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| concrete | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,110 competing apps Median installs: 1,082 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 72 major competitor apps |
| formula | 73 | 100 | 41 | 56 3,511 competing apps Median installs: 4,458 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| accepted | 73 | 100 | 35 | 55 2,930 competing apps Median installs: 2,807 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| geometry | 71 | 100 | 40 | 49 1,193 competing apps Median installs: 2,959 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| circular | 73 | 100 | 35 | 55 2,841 competing apps Median installs: 696 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| widely | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 4,798 competing apps Median installs: 3,630 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
App Description
Compare sewer flow capacity with Manning’s Formula across pipe types.
In order to evaluate possible alternatives in either pipe geometry or material, use this app to compare the hydraulic flow capacity among various concrete pipes including circular, elliptical, arch and box sections with circular thermoplastic and corrugated metal pipes.