Compare Flow
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for Compare Flow in Google Play
Compare Flow tracks 28 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 27 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 44.8, best rank 4.
Compare sewer flow capacity with Manning’s Formula across pipe types.
Tracked keywords
28
1 ranked • 27 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 4 • Latest leader 4
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: compare
Avg difficulty
44.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
compare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank 4
Competitors: 1,171
- 67.8
either
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 966
- 62.5
flow
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 423
- 65.4
box
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 866
- 62.5
evaluate
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 206
Unranked opportunities
either
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 966
flow
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 423
box
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 866
evaluate
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 206
sections
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 328
High competition keywords
various
Total apps: 74,125 • Major competitors: 9,464
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
including
Total apps: 66,643 • Major competitors: 8,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
order
Total apps: 44,242 • Major competitors: 4,188
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
across
Total apps: 38,391 • Major competitors: 5,234
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 80.6
possible
Total apps: 23,344 • Major competitors: 2,330
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compare | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 9,065 competing apps Median installs: 41,806 Avg rating: 3.0 | 4 | 4 | 1,171 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,891 competing apps Median installs: 33,950 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| flow | 72 | 100 | 43 | 63 4,574 competing apps Median installs: 27,459 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 423 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 81 | 78 38,391 competing apps Median installs: 39,224 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 5,234 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 71 | 100 | 46 | 62 3,980 competing apps Median installs: 38,241 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 508 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,344 competing apps Median installs: 31,057 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| box | 72 | 100 | 47 | 65 6,698 competing apps Median installs: 46,422 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 866 major competitor apps |
| uses | 71 | 100 | 57 | 73 19,560 competing apps Median installs: 37,716 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,125 major competitor apps |
| evaluate | 72 | 100 | 39 | 63 4,555 competing apps Median installs: 20,409 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
| pipe | 69 | 100 | 39 | 47 542 competing apps Median installs: 37,766 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 80 major competitor apps |
| sections | 72 | 100 | 41 | 63 4,770 competing apps Median installs: 28,902 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 328 major competitor apps |
| capacity | 70 | 100 | 39 | 56 1,939 competing apps Median installs: 30,907 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| metal | 70 | 100 | 41 | 56 1,850 competing apps Median installs: 40,210 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| either | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 9,262 competing apps Median installs: 32,102 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 966 major competitor apps |
| arch | 66 | 100 | 28 | 33 80 competing apps Median installs: 62,350 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| evaluating | 70 | 100 | 34 | 55 1,737 competing apps Median installs: 7,801 Avg rating: 1.5 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| concrete | 69 | 100 | 33 | 49 774 competing apps Median installs: 23,682 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 72 major competitor apps |
| formula | 70 | 100 | 47 | 56 1,823 competing apps Median installs: 43,961 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 222 major competitor apps |
| accepted | 70 | 100 | 38 | 54 1,521 competing apps Median installs: 31,599 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 152 major competitor apps |
| geometry | 69 | 100 | 54 | 47 547 competing apps Median installs: 41,321 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| circular | 69 | 100 | 37 | 50 900 competing apps Median installs: 21,946 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 81 major competitor apps |
| widely | 71 | 100 | 37 | 58 2,582 competing apps Median installs: 22,919 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 150 major competitor apps |
App Description
Compare sewer flow capacity with Manning’s Formula across pipe types.
In order to evaluate possible alternatives in either pipe geometry or material, use this app to compare the hydraulic flow capacity among various concrete pipes including circular, elliptical, arch and box sections with circular thermoplastic and corrugated metal pipes.