Solid State 3D
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 35 keywords for Solid State 3D in Google Play
Solid State 3D tracks 35 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 35 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 46.3.
Visualize the shape of unit cells, packing and voids of all types in 3D
Tracked keywords
35
0 ranked • 35 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: becomes
Avg difficulty
46.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 954
- 62.2
unit
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 360
- 66.0
shape
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 998
- 70.0
body
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,381
- 66.2
cell
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 859
Unranked opportunities
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 954
unit
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Competitors: 360
shape
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Competitors: 998
body
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 1,381
cell
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 859
High competition keywords
simple
Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
helps
Total apps: 52,541 • Major competitors: 5,480
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
making
Total apps: 52,261 • Major competitors: 6,194
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
contains
Total apps: 38,895 • Major competitors: 2,326
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| students | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 21,596 competing apps Median installs: 17,118 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 827 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,187 major competitor apps |
| contains | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 38,895 competing apps Median installs: 27,025 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,326 major competitor apps |
| face | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 24,650 competing apps Median installs: 46,450 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,493 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,198 major competitor apps |
| unit | 72 | 100 | 45 | 62 4,386 competing apps Median installs: 26,646 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| two | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 30,958 competing apps Median installs: 35,508 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,566 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,575 major competitor apps |
| understand | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 26,174 competing apps Median installs: 27,627 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,036 major competitor apps |
| shape | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 7,313 competing apps Median installs: 44,535 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 998 major competitor apps |
| crystal | 70 | 100 | 42 | 55 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 48,720 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| harder | 71 | 100 | 45 | 58 2,382 competing apps Median installs: 43,696 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 366 major competitor apps |
| visualize | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,317 competing apps Median installs: 24,769 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 268 major competitor apps |
| body | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 12,539 competing apps Median installs: 33,589 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,381 major competitor apps |
| types | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,293 competing apps Median installs: 43,355 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,118 major competitor apps |
| study | 71 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,255 competing apps Median installs: 21,619 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,105 major competitor apps |
| three | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,954 competing apps Median installs: 36,504 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,258 major competitor apps |
| cell | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,467 competing apps Median installs: 30,501 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 859 major competitor apps |
| three types | 68 | 100 | 29 | 45 455 competing apps Median installs: 51,526 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| different types | 72 | 100 | 45 | 64 5,224 competing apps Median installs: 50,664 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 765 major competitor apps |
| making | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 52,261 competing apps Median installs: 35,859 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,194 major competitor apps |
| chemistry | 70 | 100 | 35 | 54 1,426 competing apps Median installs: 29,804 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 81 major competitor apps |
| state | 72 | 100 | 53 | 69 10,824 competing apps Median installs: 25,048 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 967 major competitor apps |
| covers | 72 | 100 | 43 | 66 7,125 competing apps Median installs: 22,317 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 516 major competitor apps |
| helps | 68 | 100 | 64 | 81 52,541 competing apps Median installs: 32,306 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,480 major competitor apps |
App Description
Visualize the shape of unit cells, packing and voids of all types in 3D
This app covers the following topics:
1. Types of Unit Cell:
- Primitive/Simple cubic unit cell.
- Body-centred/body centered cubic unit cell or bcc.
- Face-centred/face centered cubic unit cell or fcc.
2. Types of Packing:
- Packing in one dimension.
- Packing in two dimension.
- Packing in three dimension.
3. Types of Voids:
- Tetrahedral void.
- Octahedral void.
You can also imagine its crystal lattice by visualizing all the unit cells.
Purpose of making this app:
- Unit cells, packing and voids are actually 3D is shape and we study it in 2D in chemistry books. So, it becomes harder to visualize and understand it in 2D. This app helps the students of chemistry to visualize it in 3D as such they can understand it better.
