Species+
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 40 keywords for Species+ in Google Play
Species+ tracks 40 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 39 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.3, difficulty 41.9, best rank 2.
CITES and CMS-listed species
Tracked keywords
40
1 ranked • 39 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 2 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
41.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.4
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 281
- 65.8
trade
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 825
- 62.6
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 216
- 61.3
organizations
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 88
- 65.6
supporting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 409
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 281
trade
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 825
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 216
organizations
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 88
supporting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 409
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 267,605 • Major competitors: 7,566
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
view
Total apps: 183,848 • Major competitors: 5,710
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
data
Total apps: 181,429 • Major competitors: 6,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
provides
Total apps: 165,643 • Major competitors: 4,946
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
many
Total apps: 165,452 • Major competitors: 10,511
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| species | 73 | 100 | 37 | 58 4,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,370 Avg rating: 2.2 | 2 | 2 | 231 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 74 | 100 | 45 | 64 11,030 competing apps Median installs: 508 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 135,996 competing apps Median installs: 1,201 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,812 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,134 competing apps Median installs: 1,238 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,071 major competitor apps |
| scientists | 71 | 100 | 32 | 49 1,171 competing apps Median installs: 1,735 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| date | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 93,251 competing apps Median installs: 698 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,733 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,605 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,566 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,457 competing apps Median installs: 2,101 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,934 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 183,848 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,710 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 165,452 competing apps Median installs: 4,214 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 10,511 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 165,643 competing apps Median installs: 1,221 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,946 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 89,360 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,411 major competitor apps |
| maintenance | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,270 competing apps Median installs: 353 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| term | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 20,289 competing apps Median installs: 1,948 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 854 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 181,429 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,597 major competitor apps |
| resource | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 15,937 competing apps Median installs: 1,025 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| result | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 19,443 competing apps Median installs: 1,742 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 717 major competitor apps |
| trade | 74 | 100 | 44 | 66 13,603 competing apps Median installs: 3,072 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 825 major competitor apps |
| distribution | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 8,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,075 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 216 major competitor apps |
| organizations | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 7,097 competing apps Median installs: 578 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 88 major competitor apps |
| supporting | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,158 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
| worldwide | 74 | 100 | 52 | 66 14,263 competing apps Median installs: 5,269 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,390 major competitor apps |
| regulations | 73 | 100 | 35 | 57 3,788 competing apps Median installs: 1,389 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
| authoritative | 71 | 100 | 31 | 48 1,004 competing apps Median installs: 3,367 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| wildlife | 72 | 100 | 34 | 54 2,480 competing apps Median installs: 1,336 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
App Description
CITES and CMS-listed species
This information resource is a result of long-term collaboration between countless individual scientists worldwide and many organizations whose contribution is gratefully acknowledged. Current funders supporting portions of the maintenance of the underlying data include: WCMC (UK), the European Commission and the CITES Secretariat.
