Serve Analyzer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for Serve Analyzer in Google Play
Serve Analyzer tracks 71 keywords (2 keywords rank; 69 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 43.6, best rank 11.
Revolutionizes the way tennis players analyze and improve their serves.
Tracked keywords
71
2 ranked • 69 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 11 • Latest leader 11
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: serving
Avg difficulty
43.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
serving
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank 11
Competitors: 317
- 65.1
vision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 395
- 59.8
estimate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 206
- 65.9
machine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,217
- 66.0
computer
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 752
Unranked opportunities
vision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 395
estimate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.9 • Competitors: 206
machine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 1,217
computer
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 752
revolutionize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.8 • Competitors: 151
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 383,308 • Major competitors: 17,750
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
mobile
Total apps: 281,665 • Major competitors: 11,158
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
designed
Total apps: 260,161 • Major competitors: 8,471
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
way
Total apps: 207,093 • Major competitors: 11,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
track
Total apps: 197,166 • Major competitors: 6,268
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| serving | 74 | 100 | 40 | 63 9,339 competing apps Median installs: 744 Avg rating: 4.1 | 11 | 11 | 317 major competitor apps |
| served | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,424 competing apps Median installs: 1,249 Avg rating: 4.2 | 11 | 11 | 76 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 135,724 competing apps Median installs: 1,421 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 5,445 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,161 competing apps Median installs: 843 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,471 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 207,093 competing apps Median installs: 1,976 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11,481 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 383,308 competing apps Median installs: 1,497 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 17,750 major competitor apps |
| serve | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 18,555 competing apps Median installs: 1,112 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 281,665 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11,158 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 122,189 competing apps Median installs: 1,370 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,878 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 129,175 competing apps Median installs: 2,585 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,593 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 53 | 76 58,002 competing apps Median installs: 4,780 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 4,911 major competitor apps |
| driven | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,968 competing apps Median installs: 663 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 418 major competitor apps |
| vision | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,271 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| helping | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 35,927 competing apps Median installs: 1,019 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,214 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 64,414 competing apps Median installs: 599 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,781 major competitor apps |
| technique | 73 | 100 | 36 | 57 3,970 competing apps Median installs: 1,660 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 197,166 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,268 major competitor apps |
| angle | 73 | 100 | 38 | 57 3,960 competing apps Median installs: 5,163 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 299 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 165,297 competing apps Median installs: 1,455 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,575 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 72 | 100 | 53 | 71 28,716 competing apps Median installs: 5,579 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,670 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 99,262 competing apps Median installs: 1,948 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,924 major competitor apps |
| visual | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 44,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,686 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,300 major competitor apps |
| players | 69 | 100 | 51 | 76 62,110 competing apps Median installs: 5,165 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,222 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,312 competing apps Median installs: 1,467 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,487 major competitor apps |
| player | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 51,183 competing apps Median installs: 5,339 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,329 major competitor apps |
App Description
Revolutionizes the way tennis players analyze and improve their serves.
🦵 Pose Estimation: Utilizes MoveNet, a machine learning model, to estimate key points in the user's serve, including joints such as elbows, shoulders, and knees.
🧔 Professional Player Comparison: Allows users to compare their serve with a professional player of equivalent height, providing visual overlays and angle comparisons.
🥎 Ball Tracking: Employs AutoML Vision for ball detection and tracking, calculating the speed of the ball after impact.
👥 User Feedback: Provides real-time feedback on joint angles, enabling users to understand their technique and receive suggestions for improvement.
📊 Data-Driven Progress Tracking: Enables users to track their progress over time, helping them monitor improvements and refine their training strategies.