RFIDAeroCheck

Developer: Descartes Intl.

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

389 installs

Ratings not yet available

+6.00 weekly installs

trend steady

+6.00 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 89 keywords for RFIDAeroCheck in Google Play

Developer: Descartes Intl. Category: productivity

RFIDAeroCheck tracks 89 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 89 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 43.7.

RFIDAeroCheck allows airlines to track components on aircraft using RFID.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 89 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.7

Top keyword: minimum

Avg difficulty

43.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

minimum

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 856
64.7
remain

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 473
63.0
server

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 844
65.0
visibility

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 285
63.3
integrates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 248
63.2

Unranked opportunities

minimum

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 856
remain

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 473
server

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 844
visibility

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 285
integrates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 248

High competition keywords

information

Total apps: 265,070 • Major competitors: 8,170

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
designed

Total apps: 263,588 • Major competitors: 8,518

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
simple

Total apps: 251,116 • Major competitors: 12,133

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
using

Total apps: 223,871 • Major competitors: 12,270

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
available

Total apps: 195,019 • Major competitors: 10,398

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
security	70	100	54	75 51,881 competing apps Median installs: 2,056 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,973 major competitor apps
changes	72	100	45	71 28,047 competing apps Median installs: 1,363 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	1,108 major competitor apps
users	67	100	53	82 137,206 competing apps Median installs: 1,355 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	5,485 major competitor apps
within	68	100	51	80 103,642 competing apps Median installs: 1,490 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	4,120 major competitor apps
information	65	100	55	86 265,070 competing apps Median installs: 1,190 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	8,170 major competitor apps
designed	65	100	54	86 263,588 competing apps Median installs: 790 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	8,518 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 109,750 competing apps Median installs: 561 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,590 major competitor apps
limited	72	100	49	71 28,819 competing apps Median installs: 4,832 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,981 major competitor apps
secure	68	100	55	80 101,395 competing apps Median installs: 992 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	4,508 major competitor apps
using	66	100	57	85 223,871 competing apps Median installs: 2,829 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	12,270 major competitor apps
life	68	100	54	81 112,908 competing apps Median installs: 2,517 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps
airline	72	100	34	51 1,599 competing apps Median installs: 3,584 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	143 major competitor apps
available	66	100	58	84 195,019 competing apps Median installs: 2,785 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	10,398 major competitor apps
interface	68	100	50	80 111,855 competing apps Median installs: 1,193 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,639 major competitor apps
track	66	100	53	84 194,044 competing apps Median installs: 534 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	6,162 major competitor apps
complete	67	100	53	83 168,381 competing apps Median installs: 2,257 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	9,384 major competitor apps
market	71	100	46	73 37,988 competing apps Median installs: 1,370 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,423 major competitor apps
minimum	74	100	44	65 11,423 competing apps Median installs: 6,249 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	856 major competitor apps
simple	66	100	55	86 251,116 competing apps Median installs: 2,062 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	12,133 major competitor apps
always	67	100	53	82 143,601 competing apps Median installs: 1,689 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	6,655 major competitor apps
ensures	70	100	47	75 49,435 competing apps Median installs: 635 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,883 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	53	84 178,774 competing apps Median installs: 1,424 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	6,548 major competitor apps
specifically	72	100	43	71 27,288 competing apps Median installs: 865 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	607 major competitor apps
back	70	100	53	75 53,483 competing apps Median installs: 3,350 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,700 major competitor apps
user	67	100	54	82 141,191 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	5,603 major competitor apps

App Description

RFIDAeroCheck allows airlines to track components on aircraft using RFID.

AeroCheck is a solution specifically designed for the aviation market sector. Utilising the immense benefits of RFID technology, AeroCheck uniquely identifies and tracks RFID-tagged emergency equipment and security locations on aircraft. Not only does AeroCheck ensure that all required emergency equipment is on aircraft, it also ensures that all of the equipment on aircraft is in date. AeroCheck also allows for the management of security locations on aircraft ensuring all areas on aircraft remain secure and are highlighted if tampered with.

Using the latest ATA Spec2000 standard, AeroCheck is a solution that is fully compliant with industry standards and integrates both server-side and handheld technology to maximise the efficiencies gained from RFID technology.

This functionality ensures that data relating to life-limited components within AeroCheck is always available at the appropriate time, ensuring maximum component life and minimum wastage.

Within AeroCheck, each component to be tracked is tagged with an RFID tag that uniquely identifies the component as per the GS1 / EPC Tag Data Standard. The information on the tag, in conjunction with data downloaded from the server, allows the handheld application to identify when components are due to expire and when component changes are required. A simple user interface allows users to complete component changes and upload the updated information back to the server ensuring global visibility for the airline fleet.