British Steel Table
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 45 keywords for British Steel Table in Google Play
British Steel Table tracks 45 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 44 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.6, difficulty 41.2, best rank 9.
British standard steel table dimensions and weight
Tracked keywords
45
1 ranked • 44 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 9 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.6
Top keyword: square
Avg difficulty
41.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
square
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 520
- 64.4
channels
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 687
- 65.2
round
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 639
- 60.8
universal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 419
- 59.9
designer
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 616
Unranked opportunities
square
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 520
channels
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.4 • Competitors: 687
round
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 639
universal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 419
designer
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 616
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 370,270 • Major competitors: 21,630
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
make
Total apps: 328,331 • Major competitors: 18,397
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
welcome
Total apps: 123,637 • Major competitors: 5,005
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
used
Total apps: 116,547 • Major competitors: 4,709
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
better
Total apps: 82,547 • Major competitors: 4,021
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| steel | 72 | 100 | 37 | 53 2,089 competing apps Median installs: 2,407 Avg rating: 2.0 | 9 | 9 | 139 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 370,270 competing apps Median installs: 2,549 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 21,630 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 328,331 competing apps Median installs: 2,060 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 18,397 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,547 competing apps Median installs: 1,772 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,021 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| welcome | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 123,637 competing apps Median installs: 811 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,005 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 72 | 100 | 56 | 71 28,935 competing apps Median installs: 4,166 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,511 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 53,299 competing apps Median installs: 2,975 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,424 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,575 competing apps Median installs: 1,228 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| project | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 21,930 competing apps Median installs: 681 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 507 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,329 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 22,035 competing apps Median installs: 2,277 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,160 major competitor apps |
| channels | 74 | 100 | 55 | 64 11,009 competing apps Median installs: 4,305 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 687 major competitor apps |
| shape | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 15,046 competing apps Median installs: 3,445 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,031 major competitor apps |
| round | 74 | 100 | 43 | 65 12,449 competing apps Median installs: 2,002 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 639 major competitor apps |
| query | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,359 competing apps Median installs: 3,101 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 149 major competitor apps |
| universal | 74 | 100 | 43 | 61 6,569 competing apps Median installs: 3,161 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 419 major competitor apps |
| square | 75 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,009 competing apps Median installs: 848 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 520 major competitor apps |
| per | 71 | 100 | 47 | 71 30,339 competing apps Median installs: 3,251 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,594 major competitor apps |
| designer | 74 | 100 | 45 | 60 5,758 competing apps Median installs: 10,337 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 616 major competitor apps |
| engineer | 72 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,848 competing apps Median installs: 1,294 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| en | 73 | 100 | 39 | 56 3,268 competing apps Median installs: 1,568 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| estimate | 74 | 100 | 37 | 60 5,629 competing apps Median installs: 1,682 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| purpose | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 18,773 competing apps Median installs: 1,536 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 584 major competitor apps |
| shapes | 74 | 100 | 43 | 63 9,350 competing apps Median installs: 4,155 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
App Description
British standard steel table dimensions and weight
* British Standard Steel Table
→ Universal Beams (BS EN 10365: 2017)
→ Universal Columns (BS EN 10365: 2017)
→ Universal Bearing Piles (BS EN 10365: 2017)
→ Asymmetric Beams (British Standard)
→ Parallel Flange Channels (BS EN 10365: 2017)
→ Equal Angles (BS EN 10056–1: 2017)
→ Unequal Angles (BS EN 10056–1: 2017)
→ Tees from UB (BS EN 10365: 2017)
→ Tees from UC (BS EN 10365: 2017)
→ Hot – Round (BS EN 10210–2: 2006)
→ Hot – Square (BS EN 10210–2: 2006)
→ Hot – Rectangle (BS EN 10210–2: 2006)
→ Cold – Round (BS EN 10219–2: 2006)
→ Cold – Square (BS EN 10219–2: 2006)
→ Cold – Rectangle (BS EN 10219–2: 2006)
* Standard shapes to calculate weight as per your dimensions.
→ Round Bar
→ Square Bar
→ Plate/Sheet
→ Round Tube
→ Square Tube
→ Rectangle Tube
→ L Angle
→ C Channel
→ I Beam
Application is to be used for reference purpose only
If you have any query or you have any inputs about new shape to add, we welcome your suggestions to make our app better and more useful.
