TPO Pocket Guide

48 installs
ratings
TPO Pocket Guide icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 73 keywords for TPO Pocket Guide in Google Play

Developer: Applied Research Associates Inc. Category: tools

TPO Pocket Guide tracks 73 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 73 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 44.0.

Thin-Polymer Bridge Deck Overlay Systems Pocket Guide

Tracked keywords

73

0  ranked •  73  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.8

Top keyword: upon

Avg difficulty

44.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • upon

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —

    Competitors: 753

    67.5
  • intended

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 786

    67.7
  • understanding

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 678

    70.0
  • course

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —

    Competitors: 828

    70.4
  • applied

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 470

    64.1

Unranked opportunities

  • upon

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 753

  • intended

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Competitors: 786

  • understanding

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 678

  • course

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 828

  • applied

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 470

High competition keywords

  • best

    Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2

  • designed

    Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6

  • provide

    Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

  • used

    Total apps: 61,233 • Major competitors: 5,711

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.3

  • may

    Total apps: 48,197 • Major competitors: 5,628

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
best651006387

131,644 competing apps

Median installs: 43,740

Avg rating: 2.9

18,001

major competitor apps

better691005779

39,640 competing apps

Median installs: 36,260

Avg rating: 3.0

4,807

major competitor apps

used671006182

61,233 competing apps

Median installs: 32,225

Avg rating: 2.8

5,711

major competitor apps

designed661005785

96,808 competing apps

Median installs: 27,484

Avg rating: 2.8

9,110

major competitor apps

provide671005582

61,536 competing apps

Median installs: 28,348

Avg rating: 2.7

5,453

major competitor apps

understanding721004470

12,473 competing apps

Median installs: 19,042

Avg rating: 2.6

678

major competitor apps

upon731004467

8,881 competing apps

Median installs: 28,496

Avg rating: 2.8

753

major competitor apps

course721004570

13,190 competing apps

Median installs: 21,457

Avg rating: 2.5

828

major competitor apps

applied721004664

5,675 competing apps

Median installs: 30,682

Avg rating: 3.4

470

major competitor apps

guide701004976

27,742 competing apps

Median installs: 22,659

Avg rating: 2.7

2,061

major competitor apps

includes691005477

33,489 competing apps

Median installs: 30,818

Avg rating: 2.9

3,100

major competitor apps

two691005377

30,958 competing apps

Median installs: 35,508

Avg rating: 2.9

3,566

major competitor apps

subject721004967

7,805 competing apps

Median installs: 30,434

Avg rating: 2.6

764

major competitor apps

prior711004462

3,973 competing apps

Median installs: 31,947

Avg rating: 3.2

383

major competitor apps

educate701003752

1,110 competing apps

Median installs: 22,846

Avg rating: 2.6

94

major competitor apps

properly711004260

3,045 competing apps

Median installs: 34,350

Avg rating: 2.8

334

major competitor apps

specified711003960

3,306 competing apps

Median installs: 29,602

Avg rating: 2.7

297

major competitor apps

owner721004164

5,604 competing apps

Median installs: 30,279

Avg rating: 2.6

446

major competitor apps

potential721004869

10,688 competing apps

Median installs: 27,318

Avg rating: 2.9

1,050

major competitor apps

vary711007762

3,981 competing apps

Median installs: 52,727

Avg rating: 3.1

590

major competitor apps

sometimes721004463

4,845 competing apps

Median installs: 35,513

Avg rating: 3.0

540

major competitor apps

broad701003954

1,421 competing apps

Median installs: 24,070

Avg rating: 2.8

141

major competitor apps

act721005264

5,356 competing apps

Median installs: 31,738

Avg rating: 2.8

569

major competitor apps

system691005878

39,167 competing apps

Median installs: 26,677

Avg rating: 2.7

3,528

major competitor apps

may681006980

48,197 competing apps

Median installs: 37,379

Avg rating: 3.0

5,628

major competitor apps

73 keywords
1 of 3

App Description

Thin-Polymer Bridge Deck Overlay Systems Pocket Guide

This app is designed to encourage a better understanding of the use of thin-polymer overlay (TPO) systems for the preservation of concrete bridge decks. A TPO refers to a multi-layer overlay system that includes a polymer resin binder with polish-resistant aggregates broadcasted or seeded into the wet polymer prior to gelling or curing. The aggregate acts to provide friction for the wearing surface. This is typically applied in two layers at a specified coverage rate. A primer or pre-treatment is sometimes used to seal cracks and act as an adhesion promoter for the TPO. The TPO system is typically 3/8 inches in thickness when properly installed. Thickness may vary slightly dependent upon the gradation of broadcast aggregates specified for the project.

A TPO is designed to:

• Minimize the intrusion of moisture, de-icing chemicals, carbonation, and other potential sources of the pre-mature degradation of concrete bridge decks.
• Provide a protective, durable, skid-resistant wearing course for a concrete bridge deck.

This app is intended to educate the designer, owner, contractor, and inspectors about TPO installation best practices. By acting with a better understanding of their designed intent, the bridge owner can capitalize on the potential benefits of these overlay systems.

Although some broad guidance is suggested as to bridge deck condition assessment, this subject is not the primary intention of this app. The same holds true with the selection of TPO materials.