Kjeldahl Optimizer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 45 keywords for Kjeldahl Optimizer in Google Play
Kjeldahl Optimizer tracks 45 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 45 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 43.1.
Optimize your Kjeldahl process parameters with a most effective Wizard.
Tracked keywords
45
0 ranked • 45 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: volume
Avg difficulty
43.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.0
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,154
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 383
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 266
- 63.4
consumption
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 354
- 62.0
tablets
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 531
Unranked opportunities
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 1,154
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 383
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 266
consumption
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 354
tablets
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.6 • Competitors: 531
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 284,168 • Major competitors: 15,707
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
information
Total apps: 269,001 • Major competitors: 8,241
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
based
Total apps: 151,311 • Major competitors: 5,822
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
contains
Total apps: 66,656 • Major competitors: 2,147
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.5
following
Total apps: 65,416 • Major competitors: 3,359
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 269,001 competing apps Median installs: 1,211 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,241 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 284,168 competing apps Median installs: 2,039 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 15,707 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,048 competing apps Median installs: 1,005 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,935 major competitor apps |
| volume | 74 | 100 | 49 | 66 13,973 competing apps Median installs: 6,490 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,154 major competitor apps |
| effective | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 37,915 competing apps Median installs: 1,110 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,249 major competitor apps |
| practical | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 35,650 competing apps Median installs: 960 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 878 major competitor apps |
| contains | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 66,656 competing apps Median installs: 5,006 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| tube | 72 | 100 | 35 | 52 1,807 competing apps Median installs: 5,717 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 49,774 competing apps Median installs: 3,962 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,868 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 65,416 competing apps Median installs: 3,716 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,359 major competitor apps |
| tablet | 72 | 100 | 56 | 70 23,978 competing apps Median installs: 5,280 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,525 major competitor apps |
| literature | 73 | 100 | 35 | 57 3,618 competing apps Median installs: 4,047 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,953 competing apps Median installs: 1,494 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 779 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,681 competing apps Median installs: 2,051 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,908 competing apps Median installs: 1,445 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 806 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,220 competing apps Median installs: 4,452 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,082 major competitor apps |
| optimize | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 24,057 competing apps Median installs: 529 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 748 major competitor apps |
| understand | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,099 competing apps Median installs: 1,820 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,808 major competitor apps |
| sample | 74 | 100 | 40 | 60 6,078 competing apps Median installs: 2,490 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 266 major competitor apps |
| background | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 59,380 competing apps Median installs: 4,792 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,794 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 22,502 competing apps Median installs: 2,899 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,262 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 151,311 competing apps Median installs: 1,480 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,822 major competitor apps |
| amount | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 24,838 competing apps Median installs: 7,215 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,561 major competitor apps |
| helpful | 73 | 100 | 57 | 68 19,980 competing apps Median installs: 3,686 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,142 major competitor apps |
| water | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 25,183 competing apps Median installs: 1,785 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,353 major competitor apps |
App Description
Optimize your Kjeldahl process parameters with a most effective Wizard.
- Number of Kjeldahl Tablets (or weight of powder)
- Volume of sulfuric acid
Distillation parameters
- Volume of water for dilution
- Volume of sodium hydroxide for alkalization
Titration parameters
- Titrant consumption for blanks
- Titrant consumption for the sample
- Calculated nitrogen amount per sample tube
It also contains helpful information to other parameters such as the digestion and distillation time, pH and volume of the boric acid and the steam power.
The calculation is based on manifold process inputs. Tables, graphs, tips and literature references help to understand the theoretical background but also the practical consequences of the following actions:
- Boric acid concentration
- Sample tube size
- Type of distillation (direct vs. standard Kjeldahl)
- Type of catalyst (Tablet type vs. powder)
- Titrant normality
- Sample type and amount