HVAC Quick Load
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for HVAC Quick Load in Google Play
HVAC Quick Load tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 46.8.
Quick and simple HVAC load calcs for all types of buildings
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: upon
Avg difficulty
46.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.5
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 753
- 68.2
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 742
- 67.6
air
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,351
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 70.8
area
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
Unranked opportunities
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 753
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 742
air
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 1,351
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
area
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Competitors: 1,388
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
simple
Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
allows
Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
please
Total apps: 75,311 • Major competitors: 7,632
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| shopping | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 17,521 competing apps Median installs: 35,991 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,220 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,918 major competitor apps | |
| dining | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,173 competing apps Median installs: 19,584 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 69 | 80 51,305 competing apps Median installs: 33,814 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,661 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,206 competing apps Median installs: 32,062 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,931 major competitor apps |
| area | 72 | 100 | 54 | 71 13,871 competing apps Median installs: 28,178 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| patient | 71 | 100 | 38 | 61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,187 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 8,881 competing apps Median installs: 28,496 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 753 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 75,311 competing apps Median installs: 36,602 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,632 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 86 | 77 30,153 competing apps Median installs: 44,000 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 4,164 major competitor apps | |
| following | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,198 major competitor apps |
| quick | 68 | 100 | 62 | 81 53,200 competing apps Median installs: 33,498 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,079 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 9,840 competing apps Median installs: 26,954 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 742 major competitor apps |
| required | 70 | 100 | 61 | 75 23,390 competing apps Median installs: 41,967 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,770 major competitor apps |
| displayed | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 10,597 competing apps Median installs: 33,591 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 886 major competitor apps |
| come | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 28,035 competing apps Median installs: 48,164 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,239 major competitor apps |
| nursing | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,141 competing apps Median installs: 22,438 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| sample | 71 | 100 | 42 | 59 2,774 competing apps Median installs: 32,292 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 237 major competitor apps |
| air | 73 | 100 | 52 | 68 9,055 competing apps Median installs: 46,491 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,351 major competitor apps |
App Description
Quick and simple HVAC load calcs for all types of buildings
You can also email all of the inputs and results to any email address.
The basis of the calculations for this utility come from various authoritative HVAC texts that list average cooling and heating load values per square foot for many building types.
All values can be displayed in English (IP) and Metric (SI) units.
The following is a sample of some of the types of buildings that can be modeled:
1. Cocktail Lounges, Bars, Taverns, Clubhouses
2. Computer Rooms
3. Dining Halls, Lunch Rooms, Cafeterias, Luncheonettes
4. Hospital Patient Rooms, Nursing Home Patient Rooms
5. Jails
6. Kitchens
7. Libraries, Museums
8. Malls, Shopping Centers
9. Medical/Dental Centers, Clinics, and Offices
10. Nightclubs
11. Offices, Commercial
12. ..... and many more
This app is great for use out in the field to quickly analyze the cooling and heating properties of a building. However, please note, that it is by no means a substitute for rigorous heating and cooling load calculations, and HVAC equipment and materials should not be selected based upon the results from this application.
AppGoblin