HVAC Quick Load
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for HVAC Quick Load in Google Play
HVAC Quick Load tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 44.1.
Quick and simple HVAC load calcs for all types of buildings
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: square
Avg difficulty
44.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
square
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 523
- 65.0
dining
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 211
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 251
- 61.3
hospital
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 354
Unranked opportunities
square
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 523
dining
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 211
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 251
hospital
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 354
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,840 • Major competitors: 10,263
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
simple
Total apps: 256,595 • Major competitors: 11,048
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
allows
Total apps: 177,540 • Major competitors: 5,758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
many
Total apps: 165,390 • Major competitors: 10,507
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
based
Total apps: 151,846 • Major competitors: 5,339
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| shopping | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,910 competing apps Median installs: 1,110 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,222 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,424 competing apps Median installs: 2,058 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,875 major competitor apps | |
| dining | 74 | 100 | 40 | 65 12,135 competing apps Median installs: 275 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 211 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 82,574 competing apps Median installs: 1,952 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,303 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,840 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,263 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 139,705 competing apps Median installs: 2,617 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,791 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 116,196 competing apps Median installs: 1,210 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,577 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,788 competing apps Median installs: 3,022 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,892 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,410 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,304 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 165,390 competing apps Median installs: 4,219 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 10,507 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,696 competing apps Median installs: 527 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 56 | 86 256,595 competing apps Median installs: 1,672 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 11,048 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,970 competing apps Median installs: 2,384 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 587 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,540 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,758 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 54 | 81 128,204 competing apps Median installs: 3,775 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 6,220 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 79 | 76 63,073 competing apps Median installs: 2,583 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,102 major competitor apps | |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,151 competing apps Median installs: 2,826 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,083 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 141,940 competing apps Median installs: 1,230 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,243 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,727 competing apps Median installs: 1,194 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 701 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 41,626 competing apps Median installs: 3,176 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,197 major competitor apps |
| displayed | 72 | 100 | 46 | 69 21,164 competing apps Median installs: 1,875 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 726 major competitor apps |
| come | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 50,573 competing apps Median installs: 3,430 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,514 major competitor apps |
| nursing | 73 | 100 | 34 | 55 2,791 competing apps Median installs: 1,466 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| sample | 74 | 100 | 40 | 60 6,044 competing apps Median installs: 1,857 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| air | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 19,084 competing apps Median installs: 2,523 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,282 major competitor apps |
App Description
Quick and simple HVAC load calcs for all types of buildings
You can also email all of the inputs and results to any email address.
The basis of the calculations for this utility come from various authoritative HVAC texts that list average cooling and heating load values per square foot for many building types.
All values can be displayed in English (IP) and Metric (SI) units.
The following is a sample of some of the types of buildings that can be modeled:
1. Cocktail Lounges, Bars, Taverns, Clubhouses
2. Computer Rooms
3. Dining Halls, Lunch Rooms, Cafeterias, Luncheonettes
4. Hospital Patient Rooms, Nursing Home Patient Rooms
5. Jails
6. Kitchens
7. Libraries, Museums
8. Malls, Shopping Centers
9. Medical/Dental Centers, Clinics, and Offices
10. Nightclubs
11. Offices, Commercial
12. ..... and many more
This app is great for use out in the field to quickly analyze the cooling and heating properties of a building. However, please note, that it is by no means a substitute for rigorous heating and cooling load calculations, and HVAC equipment and materials should not be selected based upon the results from this application.
