HVAC Quick Load Plus
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for HVAC Quick Load Plus in Google Play
HVAC Quick Load Plus tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 43.4.
Quick and simple HVAC load calcs for all types of buildings
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: dining
Avg difficulty
43.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.0
dining
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 213
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 200
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 262
- 61.3
hospital
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 366
- 61.6
properties
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 236
Unranked opportunities
dining
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 213
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 200
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 262
hospital
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 366
properties
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 236
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,245 • Major competitors: 11,030
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
simple
Total apps: 249,743 • Major competitors: 12,064
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
allows
Total apps: 179,058 • Major competitors: 6,593
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
many
Total apps: 166,917 • Major competitors: 11,862
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.9
based
Total apps: 154,090 • Major competitors: 5,983
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| shopping | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 44,147 competing apps Median installs: 1,235 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,320 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 68,769 competing apps Median installs: 2,554 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,062 major competitor apps | |
| dining | 74 | 100 | 40 | 65 12,008 competing apps Median installs: 291 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 81,771 competing apps Median installs: 2,565 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,558 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,245 competing apps Median installs: 1,393 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,030 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 140,933 competing apps Median installs: 3,233 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 8,814 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 57 | 81 120,089 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,241 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 46,161 competing apps Median installs: 4,082 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,004 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,632 competing apps Median installs: 1,651 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,436 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 166,917 competing apps Median installs: 5,298 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 11,862 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,560 competing apps Median installs: 599 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 200 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 249,743 competing apps Median installs: 2,085 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,064 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 17,158 competing apps Median installs: 3,015 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 660 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 179,058 competing apps Median installs: 1,434 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 6,593 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 53 | 81 129,568 competing apps Median installs: 4,943 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,079 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 74 | 76 62,058 competing apps Median installs: 3,135 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,343 major competitor apps | |
| following | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 64,554 competing apps Median installs: 3,736 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,305 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 137,975 competing apps Median installs: 1,440 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,694 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,177 competing apps Median installs: 1,502 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 760 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 53 | 74 42,216 competing apps Median installs: 3,964 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,470 major competitor apps |
| displayed | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 21,422 competing apps Median installs: 2,453 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 831 major competitor apps |
| come | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 51,099 competing apps Median installs: 4,350 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,991 major competitor apps |
| nursing | 72 | 100 | 33 | 55 2,752 competing apps Median installs: 1,710 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| sample | 74 | 100 | 39 | 60 5,974 competing apps Median installs: 2,463 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| air | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 18,833 competing apps Median installs: 2,822 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,391 major competitor apps |
App Description
Quick and simple HVAC load calcs for all types of buildings
You can also email all of the inputs and results to any email address.
The basis of the calculations for this utility come from various authoritative HVAC texts that list average cooling and heating load values per square foot for many building types.
All values can be displayed in English (IP) and Metric (SI) units.
The following is a sample of some of the types of buildings that can be modeled:
1. Cocktail Lounges, Bars, Taverns, Clubhouses
2. Computer Rooms
3. Dining Halls, Lunch Rooms, Cafeterias, Luncheonettes
4. Hospital Patient Rooms, Nursing Home Patient Rooms
5. Jails
6. Kitchens
7. Libraries, Museums
8. Malls, Shopping Centers
9. Medical/Dental Centers, Clinics, and Offices
10. Nightclubs
11. Offices, Commercial
12. ..... and many more
This app is great for use out in the field to quickly analyze the cooling and heating properties of a building. However, please note, that it is by no means a substitute for rigorous heating and cooling load calculations, and HVAC equipment and materials should not be selected based upon the results from this application.
