JokenPo - Pedra Papel eTesoura

Developer: Cleber Robson

Category: Games: Casual

Add App to Comparison

15 installs

Ratings not yet available

MAU not available

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 31 keywords for JokenPo - Pedra Papel eTesoura in Google Play

Developer: Cleber Robson Category: game_casual Rating: 2.74

JokenPo - Pedra Papel eTesoura tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.8, difficulty 44.8.

Stone, paper and scissors, also called jokenpô in some regions of Brazil.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.8

Top keyword: solely

Avg difficulty

44.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

solely

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 234
61.1
regions

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 255
59.4
unlike

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 507
61.2
recognize

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 449
62.8
rely

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 237
59.4

Unranked opportunities

solely

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Competitors: 234
regions

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 255
unlike

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 507
recognize

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Competitors: 449
rely

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 237

High competition keywords

explore

Total apps: 129,937 • Major competitors: 8,313

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
used

Total apps: 116,194 • Major competitors: 4,649

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
well

Total apps: 92,173 • Major competitors: 3,591

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
playing

Total apps: 56,874 • Major competitors: 5,877

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
practice

Total apps: 56,538 • Major competitors: 1,930

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
choosing	73	100	45	68 18,970 competing apps Median installs: 2,931 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,091 major competitor apps
used	68	100	55	81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,649 major competitor apps
among	71	100	47	73 36,961 competing apps Median installs: 2,141 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,775 major competitor apps
explore	67	100	59	81 129,937 competing apps Median installs: 1,821 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	8,313 major competitor apps
playing	70	100	56	76 56,874 competing apps Median installs: 8,876 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,877 major competitor apps
player	70	100	53	75 50,728 competing apps Median installs: 5,186 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,933 major competitor apps
logic	73	100	44	67 15,583 competing apps Median installs: 2,842 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	937 major competitor apps
extends	72	100	33	53 2,027 competing apps Median installs: 990 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	55 major competitor apps
often	73	100	47	68 18,143 competing apps Median installs: 2,612 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	600 major competitor apps
especially	72	100	45	70 23,326 competing apps Median installs: 2,742 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,090 major competitor apps
method	73	100	44	68 17,518 competing apps Median installs: 2,248 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	756 major competitor apps
teams	73	100	50	67 15,061 competing apps Median installs: 974 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	598 major competitor apps
well	68	100	51	79 92,173 competing apps Median installs: 2,076 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,591 major competitor apps
played	73	100	45	68 17,394 competing apps Median installs: 7,826 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,450 major competitor apps
several	71	100	47	72 33,483 competing apps Median installs: 2,968 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,655 major competitor apps
solely	74	100	38	61 6,831 competing apps Median installs: 1,571 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	234 major competitor apps
little	71	100	52	72 33,731 competing apps Median installs: 4,461 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	2,750 major competitor apps
paper	73	100	48	68 17,815 competing apps Median installs: 2,208 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	838 major competitor apps
practice	70	100	50	76 56,538 competing apps Median installs: 1,588 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,930 major competitor apps
perceive	70	100	26	42 462 competing apps Median installs: 2,032 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	15 major competitor apps
regions	74	100	41	59 5,395 competing apps Median installs: 2,972 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	255 major competitor apps
unlike	74	100	41	61 6,944 competing apps Median installs: 3,593 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	507 major competitor apps
selection	70	100	49	74 45,892 competing apps Median installs: 1,634 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,294 major competitor apps
turns	73	100	43	66 14,536 competing apps Median installs: 2,351 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	783 major competitor apps
recognize	74	100	58	63 8,798 competing apps Median installs: 2,126 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	449 major competitor apps

App Description

Stone, paper and scissors, also called jokenpô in some regions of Brazil.

The game is often used as a selection method (as in choosing teams to practice sports, for example), as well as tossing coins, playing dice, among others. However, unlike these methods that rely solely on luck, rock-paper-scissors can be played with a little skill. Especially if the game extends over several turns with the same player, the player can recognize and explore the logic of the opponent's behavior (perceive and precede the opponent's moves).