eXport-it FFmpeg
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 90 keywords for eXport-it FFmpeg in Google Play
eXport-it FFmpeg tracks 90 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 89 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 47.8, best rank 22.
media streaming by HTTP, UPNP and UDP multicast
Tracked keywords
90
1 ranked • 89 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 22 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: api
Avg difficulty
47.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 402
- 61.8
smoothly
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 408
- 60.5
define
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 285
- 60.5
ip
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 576
- 64.1
browser
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 829
Unranked opportunities
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 402
smoothly
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 408
define
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 285
ip
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 576
browser
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Competitors: 829
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 340,665 • Major competitors: 12,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
like
Total apps: 290,495 • Major competitors: 22,576
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.6
using
Total apps: 221,253 • Major competitors: 12,091
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
way
Total apps: 207,112 • Major competitors: 11,486
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
start
Total apps: 201,805 • Major competitors: 13,028
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| export | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 18,537 competing apps Median installs: 2,157 Avg rating: 4.0 | 22 | 22 | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| library | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 32,607 competing apps Median installs: 2,231 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,694 major competitor apps |
| page | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 28,386 competing apps Median installs: 3,592 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,615 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 57,086 competing apps Median installs: 4,938 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,388 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 108,562 competing apps Median installs: 3,348 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,822 major competitor apps |
| connected | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 74,475 competing apps Median installs: 636 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,408 major competitor apps |
| images | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 71,911 competing apps Median installs: 2,920 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,316 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 172,150 competing apps Median installs: 1,475 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 8,016 major competitor apps |
| audio | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 67,614 competing apps Median installs: 4,150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,550 major competitor apps |
| date | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 93,605 competing apps Median installs: 797 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,930 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,888 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,095 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,851 competing apps Median installs: 1,832 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 7,550 major competitor apps |
| secure | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 107,096 competing apps Median installs: 894 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,636 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 207,112 competing apps Median installs: 1,977 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11,486 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 221,253 competing apps Median installs: 2,895 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 12,091 major competitor apps |
| menu | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 40,640 competing apps Median installs: 699 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,335 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 47,530 competing apps Median installs: 3,040 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,534 major competitor apps |
| api | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 14,092 competing apps Median installs: 474 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 402 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 131,625 competing apps Median installs: 2,903 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,050 major competitor apps |
| photos | 70 | 100 | 57 | 76 61,482 competing apps Median installs: 4,005 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,443 major competitor apps |
| products | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 66,752 competing apps Median installs: 1,005 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,469 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 340,665 competing apps Median installs: 1,167 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 12,547 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,444 competing apps Median installs: 1,921 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 2,214 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 201,805 competing apps Median installs: 2,639 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 13,028 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 15,548 competing apps Median installs: 2,329 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 852 major competitor apps |
App Description
media streaming by HTTP, UPNP and UDP multicast
To start a multicast channel requires a specific client part of this application, the same as the eXport-it client of my other up-to-date products.
To use a multicast channel can be done with other products like VLC, SMPlayer running on other platforms or on Android...
When using VLC the URL to use a Multicast channel is smoothly different like udp://@239.255.147.111:27192... just with an extra "@".
With an UDP Multicast channel the media data are sent only once to be shown on multiple clients, there is no real synchronization, and the delay can be seconds depending on the buffering and device characteristics.
Listening to an audio multicast channel can be done with other products but the specific client shows images also sent over IP multicast. If you want to send specific photos with your music, you can use the "Page 2" option menu on the server, to select only the images you want, unselect all images with one click, then select these you want...
There are advantages and inconveniences with each protocol. UPnP and Multicast channel can only be used on local network (mainly Wi-Fi), HTTP streaming works locally but also over Internet and use a Web browser as client. UPnP and Multicast channel have no secure way to control access, and any device connected on the Wi-Fi network can use the running server.
With HTTP protocol, you can define usernames and passwords, and set files in access categories (groups), limiting access to some media files to specific users.
The settings of the server permits to limit which files are distributed and to set a category name per file.