eXport-it FFmpeg
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 89 keywords for eXport-it FFmpeg in Google Play
eXport-it FFmpeg tracks 89 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 89 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 54.4.
media streaming by HTTP, UPNP and UDP multicast
Tracked keywords
89
0 ranked • 89 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: done
Avg difficulty
54.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 937
- 70.7
library
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,491
- 70.8
page
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,547
- 70.7
menu
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,278
- 66.3
seconds
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 962
Unranked opportunities
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Competitors: 937
library
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.8 • Competitors: 1,491
page
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Competitors: 1,547
menu
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 64.5 • Competitors: 1,278
seconds
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Competitors: 962
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
want
Total apps: 103,224 • Major competitors: 12,476
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| library | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 13,762 competing apps Median installs: 29,536 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,491 major competitor apps |
| page | 72 | 100 | 52 | 71 13,904 competing apps Median installs: 37,180 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,547 major competitor apps |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 72 | 81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,390 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 22,704 competing apps Median installs: 25,700 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,181 major competitor apps |
| images | 69 | 100 | 59 | 78 37,077 competing apps Median installs: 30,933 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,614 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| audio | 69 | 100 | 57 | 77 34,042 competing apps Median installs: 32,206 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,287 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 60 | 77 31,688 competing apps Median installs: 26,732 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,809 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,945 major competitor apps |
| secure | 69 | 100 | 66 | 78 35,889 competing apps Median installs: 30,578 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,055 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| menu | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 13,685 competing apps Median installs: 28,103 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,278 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,446 major competitor apps |
| api | 71 | 100 | 46 | 61 3,812 competing apps Median installs: 21,435 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 68 | 77 34,126 competing apps Median installs: 44,996 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,901 major competitor apps |
| products | 70 | 100 | 58 | 76 26,531 competing apps Median installs: 29,150 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,907 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| code | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 19,267 competing apps Median installs: 32,705 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 88,254 competing apps Median installs: 44,186 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 11,840 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 72 | 100 | 48 | 66 7,582 competing apps Median installs: 40,910 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 962 major competitor apps |
| delay | 70 | 100 | 42 | 56 1,786 competing apps Median installs: 37,542 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 178 major competitor apps |
App Description
media streaming by HTTP, UPNP and UDP multicast
To start a multicast channel requires a specific client part of this application, the same as the eXport-it client of my other up-to-date products.
To use a multicast channel can be done with other products like VLC, SMPlayer running on other platforms or on Android...
When using VLC the URL to use a Multicast channel is smoothly different like udp://@239.255.147.111:27192... just with an extra "@".
With an UDP Multicast channel the media data are sent only once to be shown on multiple clients, there is no real synchronization, and the delay can be seconds depending on the buffering and device characteristics.
Listening to an audio multicast channel can be done with other products but the specific client shows images also sent over IP multicast. If you want to send specific photos with your music, you can use the "Page 2" option menu on the server, to select only the images you want, unselect all images with one click, then select these you want...
There are advantages and inconveniences with each protocol. UPnP and Multicast channel can only be used on local network (mainly Wi-Fi), HTTP streaming works locally but also over Internet and use a Web browser as client. UPnP and Multicast channel have no secure way to control access, and any device connected on the Wi-Fi network can use the running server.
With HTTP protocol, you can define usernames and passwords, and set files in access categories (groups), limiting access to some media files to specific users.
The settings of the server permits to limit which files are distributed and to set a category name per file.