IQ - Amthauer Test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 60 keywords for IQ - Amthauer Test in Google Play
IQ - Amthauer Test tracks 60 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 60 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 43.1.
Amthauer's test for measuring the level of intellectual development.
Tracked keywords
60
0 ranked • 60 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: obtain
Avg difficulty
43.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 605
- 62.6
structure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 254
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
- 64.4
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 498
- 63.0
operate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 502
Unranked opportunities
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 605
structure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 254
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 125
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 498
operate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 502
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 390,164 • Major competitors: 17,979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.8
information
Total apps: 265,070 • Major competitors: 8,170
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
designed
Total apps: 263,588 • Major competitors: 8,518
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
share
Total apps: 214,435 • Major competitors: 11,854
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
allows
Total apps: 178,774 • Major competitors: 6,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 105,310 competing apps Median installs: 2,508 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,912 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 214,435 competing apps Median installs: 2,942 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 11,854 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 140,408 competing apps Median installs: 554 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,302 major competitor apps |
| words | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,915 competing apps Median installs: 4,753 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,992 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,790 competing apps Median installs: 1,419 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,137 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 265,070 competing apps Median installs: 1,190 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,170 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 263,588 competing apps Median installs: 790 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,518 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 128,933 competing apps Median installs: 2,317 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,082 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 390,164 competing apps Median installs: 1,395 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 17,979 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 13,511 competing apps Median installs: 2,889 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 140,641 competing apps Median installs: 3,250 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 8,773 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 95,480 competing apps Median installs: 2,127 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,274 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 168,381 competing apps Median installs: 2,257 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 9,384 major competitor apps |
| hour | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 15,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,291 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| practical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 34,460 competing apps Median installs: 916 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 853 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 178,774 competing apps Median installs: 1,424 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 6,548 major competitor apps |
| differentiated | 71 | 100 | 29 | 48 957 competing apps Median installs: 2,695 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 64,645 competing apps Median installs: 3,753 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,310 major competitor apps |
| structure | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 8,523 competing apps Median installs: 1,301 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 254 major competitor apps |
| tasks | 71 | 100 | 48 | 71 29,835 competing apps Median installs: 1,366 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,611 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 25,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,109 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 49,849 competing apps Median installs: 2,396 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,369 major competitor apps |
| understand | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 58,024 competing apps Median installs: 1,696 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,836 major competitor apps |
| assessment | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 6,877 competing apps Median installs: 1,142 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| starting | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 25,515 competing apps Median installs: 2,849 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,531 major competitor apps |
App Description
Amthauer's test for measuring the level of intellectual development.
Due to the subtest structure, the test allows differentiated assessment of the level of development of various aspects of intelligence. Individual subtests are combined into the following groups:
1. A complex of verbal subtests, suggesting a general
the ability to operate with words as signals and symbols: subtests 1-4, 9.
2. A complex of mathematical subtests: 5, 6, assuming
ability in practical mathematics and programming.
3. A complex of constructive subtests: 7, 8, suggesting developed
constructive theoretical and practical skills.
For the diagnosis of these mental abilities, 9 subtests (sections) of 16 - 20 questions are provided. Time for each subtest is limited! The total test time is 1 hour 30 minutes.
Before starting the passage of each section, instructions are given on how to complete the tasks with examples of solutions. It is recommended to study it well in order to understand the content of the tasks as accurately as possible.
After completing the test, it is possible to share the result with other users.