LM Playground
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 24 keywords for LM Playground in Google Play
LM Playground tracks 24 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 23 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 47.0, best rank 17.
Run AI models locally on device (Qwen, Gemma, Llama, DeepSeek, Phi, Mistral)
Tracked keywords
24
1 ranked • 23 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 17 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: api
Avg difficulty
47.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 402
- 65.8
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 978
- 62.1
sd
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 859
- 67.3
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 926
- 68.4
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,051
Unranked opportunities
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 402
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Competitors: 978
sd
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.4 • Competitors: 859
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 926
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 1,051
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 338,405 • Major competitors: 17,492
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
start
Total apps: 201,805 • Major competitors: 13,028
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
phone
Total apps: 152,947 • Major competitors: 9,505
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
device
Total apps: 108,562 • Major competitors: 6,822
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
store
Total apps: 81,790 • Major competitors: 4,255
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| playground | 72 | 100 | 39 | 53 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 13,839 Avg rating: 3.8 | 17 | 17 | 291 major competitor apps |
| download | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 338,405 competing apps Median installs: 2,107 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17,492 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 108,562 competing apps Median installs: 3,348 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,822 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 152,947 competing apps Median installs: 3,555 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,505 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 16,868 competing apps Median installs: 1,500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 62,347 competing apps Median installs: 3,020 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,694 major competitor apps |
| api | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 14,092 competing apps Median installs: 474 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 402 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,876 competing apps Median installs: 998 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,932 major competitor apps |
| store | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 81,790 competing apps Median installs: 1,653 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,255 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,444 competing apps Median installs: 1,921 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 2,214 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 19,822 competing apps Median installs: 2,548 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,051 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 201,805 competing apps Median installs: 2,639 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 13,028 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 44,921 competing apps Median installs: 3,903 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,636 major competitor apps |
| ai | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 52,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,822 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,097 major competitor apps |
| thinking | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 19,417 competing apps Median installs: 2,301 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,061 major competitor apps |
| leave | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 40,800 competing apps Median installs: 2,566 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,231 major competitor apps |
| load | 74 | 100 | 46 | 66 13,606 competing apps Median installs: 2,188 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 978 major competitor apps |
| rich | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,879 competing apps Median installs: 2,279 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,081 major competitor apps |
| large | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 42,995 competing apps Median installs: 4,314 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,735 major competitor apps |
| sd | 74 | 100 | 53 | 62 7,962 competing apps Median installs: 15,360 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 859 major competitor apps |
| lm | 68 | 100 | 27 | 34 128 competing apps Median installs: 1,298 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| reasoning | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,115 competing apps Median installs: 1,606 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 132 major competitor apps |
| arm | 72 | 100 | 36 | 55 2,732 competing apps Median installs: 4,263 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 214 major competitor apps |
| markdown | 69 | 100 | 25 | 40 315 competing apps Median installs: 929 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
App Description
Run AI models locally on device (Qwen, Gemma, Llama, DeepSeek, Phi, Mistral)
Features:
- Rich markdown in responses - code blocks, headers, lists, and more
- Reasoning models show their thinking process in a styled section
- Choose where to store models - SD card, external storage, any folder
Supported models:
- Qwen 3 (0.6B, 1.7B, 4B)
- Gemma 3n (E2B, E4B)
- Gemma 3 (1B, 4B)
- Granite 4.0 (Micro, H-Tiny)
- DeepSeek R1 Distill (1.5B, 7B)
- Phi-4 mini
- LFM2.5 Thinking (1.2B)
- Ministral 3 (3B, 8B)
- Llama 3.2 (1B, 3B)
Built on llama.cpp with ARM optimizations for on-device performance. Models use GGUF format with Q4_K_M quantization.
