Online Ordering Wrapper
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for Online Ordering Wrapper in Google Play
Online Ordering Wrapper tracks 28 keywords (2 keywords rank; 26 need traction). Key metrics: 50% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 50.2, best rank 3.
Eposmatic's Online Ordering Wrapper.
Tracked keywords
28
2 ranked • 26 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
50%
Best rank 3 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: restaurants
Avg difficulty
50.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.7
restaurants
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 402
- 65.8
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 899
- 65.7
every time
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 635
- 58.4
online ordering
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.1 • Rank 3
Competitors: 15
- 66.5
native
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 620
Unranked opportunities
restaurants
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Competitors: 402
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Competitors: 899
every time
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 635
native
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 620
domain
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.9 • Competitors: 106
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,063 • Major competitors: 16,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
like
Total apps: 289,428 • Major competitors: 20,631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
every
Total apps: 259,042 • Major competitors: 13,101
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
using
Total apps: 221,778 • Major competitors: 10,937
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
online
Total apps: 196,118 • Major competitors: 9,442
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online ordering | 73 | 100 | 35 | 58 4,677 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 15 major competitor apps |
| ordering | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 36,947 competing apps Median installs: 177 Avg rating: 1.7 | 23 | 23 | 388 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 196,118 competing apps Median installs: 1,362 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 9,442 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,175 competing apps Median installs: 1,755 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,965 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,778 competing apps Median installs: 2,281 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,937 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,063 competing apps Median installs: 1,257 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,155 major competitor apps |
| restaurants | 74 | 100 | 49 | 66 13,257 competing apps Median installs: 456 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 402 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 56 | 79 96,347 competing apps Median installs: 3,208 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 6,630 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 289,428 competing apps Median installs: 3,592 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 20,631 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 259,042 competing apps Median installs: 1,985 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 13,101 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 52,994 competing apps Median installs: 2,842 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,337 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,544 competing apps Median installs: 1,567 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,147 major competitor apps |
| enter | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 51,887 competing apps Median installs: 2,322 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,435 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 129,544 competing apps Median installs: 2,526 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,718 major competitor apps |
| full screen | 72 | 100 | 45 | 54 2,527 competing apps Median installs: 11,178 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| screen | 68 | 100 | 62 | 80 100,243 competing apps Median installs: 3,418 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,986 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 85,239 competing apps Median installs: 690 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,000 major competitor apps |
| would | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 38,156 competing apps Median installs: 2,822 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,045 major competitor apps |
| gestures | 72 | 100 | 56 | 53 2,131 competing apps Median installs: 7,200 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| load | 74 | 100 | 47 | 66 13,528 competing apps Median installs: 2,267 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 899 major competitor apps |
| ability | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 51,345 competing apps Median installs: 2,224 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,045 major competitor apps |
| cache | 72 | 100 | 59 | 52 1,715 competing apps Median installs: 16,478 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| gives | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,034 competing apps Median installs: 2,337 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,632 major competitor apps |
| native | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 14,933 competing apps Median installs: 2,181 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 620 major competitor apps |
| domain | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,228 competing apps Median installs: 1,850 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
App Description
Eposmatic's Online Ordering Wrapper.
Gives restaurants ability to open their domain using this Wrapper app.
This app gives better user experience
Key Features:
1 - Full Screen For Online Ordering
2 - Local Cache
3 - Back handler gestures support
4 - Native App Like Experience
Users just need to enter their online ordering domain once and the app would cache it and load it every time the user opens the app.