Online Ordering Wrapper
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for Online Ordering Wrapper in Google Play
Online Ordering Wrapper tracks 28 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 28 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 68.9, difficulty 54.2.
Eposmatic's Online Ordering Wrapper.
Tracked keywords
28
0 ranked • 28 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
68.9
Top keyword: ordering
Avg difficulty
54.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.1
ordering
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 386
- 64.6
load
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 923
- 65.7
native
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 617
- 66.0
every time
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 806
- 62.0
restaurants
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 63.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 472
Unranked opportunities
ordering
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 386
load
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Competitors: 923
native
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 617
every time
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 806
restaurants
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 63.3 • Competitors: 472
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
online
Total apps: 80,029 • Major competitors: 9,770
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 57 | 79 39,640 competing apps Median installs: 36,260 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,807 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| restaurants | 71 | 100 | 63 | 62 4,231 competing apps Median installs: 22,817 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,748 major competitor apps |
| ordering | 72 | 100 | 42 | 64 5,620 competing apps Median installs: 14,204 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 386 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 68 | 88 150,415 competing apps Median installs: 46,503 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,531 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 62 | 87 125,665 competing apps Median installs: 38,364 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,037 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 62 | 76 28,322 competing apps Median installs: 45,422 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,042 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,926 major competitor apps |
| enter | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 26,195 competing apps Median installs: 35,455 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,973 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 67,878 competing apps Median installs: 40,620 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,324 major competitor apps |
| full screen | 70 | 100 | 49 | 55 1,700 competing apps Median installs: 46,534 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| screen | 68 | 100 | 69 | 80 50,519 competing apps Median installs: 38,965 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,195 major competitor apps |
| local | 70 | 100 | 59 | 76 28,377 competing apps Median installs: 26,545 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,999 major competitor apps |
| would | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 21,026 competing apps Median installs: 40,766 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,446 major competitor apps |
| gestures | 70 | 100 | 61 | 54 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 55,314 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 221 major competitor apps |
| load | 72 | 100 | 52 | 65 6,051 competing apps Median installs: 48,731 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 923 major competitor apps |
| online ordering | 68 | 100 | 28 | 46 467 competing apps Median installs: 13,044 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| ability | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 25,091 competing apps Median installs: 29,517 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,202 major competitor apps |
| cache | 70 | 100 | 61 | 52 1,048 competing apps Median installs: 71,796 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 189 major competitor apps |
| gives | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 29,470 competing apps Median installs: 35,551 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,289 major competitor apps |
| native | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,008 competing apps Median installs: 29,968 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 617 major competitor apps |
| domain | 70 | 100 | 36 | 56 1,966 competing apps Median installs: 24,371 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
App Description
Eposmatic's Online Ordering Wrapper.
Gives restaurants ability to open their domain using this Wrapper app.
This app gives better user experience
Key Features:
1 - Full Screen For Online Ordering
2 - Local Cache
3 - Back handler gestures support
4 - Native App Like Experience
Users just need to enter their online ordering domain once and the app would cache it and load it every time the user opens the app.