Online Ordering Wrapper
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 28 keywords for Online Ordering Wrapper in Google Play
Online Ordering Wrapper tracks 28 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 28 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 48.8.
Eposmatic's Online Ordering Wrapper.
Tracked keywords
28
0 ranked • 28 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: restaurants
Avg difficulty
48.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
restaurants
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 428
- 65.7
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 964
- 65.9
every time
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 740
- 58.4
online ordering
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 17
- 66.4
native
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 644
Unranked opportunities
restaurants
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 428
load
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Competitors: 964
every time
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 740
online ordering
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.1 • Competitors: 17
native
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 644
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 392,509 • Major competitors: 18,213
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
like
Total apps: 284,709 • Major competitors: 22,305
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.7
every
Total apps: 263,932 • Major competitors: 14,792
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
using
Total apps: 225,382 • Major competitors: 12,414
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
online
Total apps: 193,010 • Major competitors: 10,101
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 193,010 competing apps Median installs: 1,524 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 10,101 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 83,488 competing apps Median installs: 2,078 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,483 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 225,382 competing apps Median installs: 2,811 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,414 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 392,509 competing apps Median installs: 1,395 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,213 major competitor apps |
| restaurants | 74 | 100 | 48 | 66 13,386 competing apps Median installs: 495 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 428 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 93,568 competing apps Median installs: 4,330 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,168 major competitor apps |
| ordering | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,443 competing apps Median installs: 215 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 61 | 87 284,709 competing apps Median installs: 4,607 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 22,305 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 263,932 competing apps Median installs: 2,221 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 14,792 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 53,856 competing apps Median installs: 3,309 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,746 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 138,349 competing apps Median installs: 2,054 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,490 major competitor apps |
| enter | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 52,618 competing apps Median installs: 2,638 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,761 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 131,793 competing apps Median installs: 3,080 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,674 major competitor apps |
| full screen | 72 | 100 | 42 | 54 2,556 competing apps Median installs: 16,325 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| screen | 68 | 100 | 59 | 80 97,589 competing apps Median installs: 4,406 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 6,544 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 79,980 competing apps Median installs: 919 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,144 major competitor apps |
| would | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 38,554 competing apps Median installs: 3,814 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,297 major competitor apps |
| gestures | 72 | 100 | 50 | 53 2,174 competing apps Median installs: 8,353 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 212 major competitor apps |
| load | 74 | 100 | 46 | 66 13,151 competing apps Median installs: 2,318 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 964 major competitor apps |
| online ordering | 73 | 100 | 35 | 58 4,595 competing apps Median installs: 98 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| ability | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,839 competing apps Median installs: 2,919 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,244 major competitor apps |
| cache | 72 | 100 | 53 | 51 1,642 competing apps Median installs: 18,566 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 201 major competitor apps |
| gives | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 59,083 competing apps Median installs: 2,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,023 major competitor apps |
| native | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 14,563 competing apps Median installs: 2,904 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| domain | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,137 competing apps Median installs: 2,610 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
App Description
Eposmatic's Online Ordering Wrapper.
Gives restaurants ability to open their domain using this Wrapper app.
This app gives better user experience
Key Features:
1 - Full Screen For Online Ordering
2 - Local Cache
3 - Back handler gestures support
4 - Native App Like Experience
Users just need to enter their online ordering domain once and the app would cache it and load it every time the user opens the app.