SimpliFASD

Developer: Avicenna Research

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

265 installs

Ratings not yet available

14 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +1.00

Declining

Monthly +6.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 47 keywords for SimpliFASD in Google Play

Developer: Avicenna Research Category: tools

SimpliFASD tracks 47 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 47 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.5, difficulty 42.3.

Guide clinicians prescribing psychotropic medications for FASD/ND-PAE patients

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 47 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.5

Top keyword: patients

Avg difficulty

42.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 183
63.5
patient

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 195
64.8
decision

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 545
64.9
greatest

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 592
63.1
unwanted

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 74.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 809
62.0

Unranked opportunities

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 183
patient

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
decision

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 545
greatest

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 592
unwanted

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 74.1 • Competitors: 809

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 282,188 • Major competitors: 14,387

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
using

Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
manage

Total apps: 186,292 • Major competitors: 6,752

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
daily

Total apps: 170,087 • Major competitors: 7,784

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
complete

Total apps: 169,116 • Major competitors: 8,785

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
medication	73	100	36	59 5,089 competing apps Median installs: 714 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	105 major competitor apps
manage	66	100	56	84 186,292 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	6,752 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,965 major competitor apps
include	71	100	48	72 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 2,136 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,289 major competitor apps
help	65	100	60	87 282,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	14,387 major competitor apps
tree	73	100	38	59 4,780 competing apps Median installs: 2,843 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	266 major competitor apps
function	71	100	48	73 37,188 competing apps Median installs: 2,988 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,825 major competitor apps
patients	74	100	39	63 9,687 competing apps Median installs: 670 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	183 major competitor apps
complete	67	100	54	83 169,116 competing apps Median installs: 2,111 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	8,785 major competitor apps
patient	74	100	39	65 11,704 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	195 major competitor apps
improve	68	100	52	80 99,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,635 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,467 major competitor apps
ever	71	100	55	72 33,568 competing apps Median installs: 3,473 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	2,573 major competitor apps
guide	69	100	48	77 71,709 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,014 major competitor apps
identify	72	100	52	70 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	983 major competitor apps
reduce	72	100	47	70 24,741 competing apps Median installs: 909 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	750 major competitor apps
decision	74	100	41	65 11,927 competing apps Median installs: 1,680 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	545 major competitor apps
greatest	74	100	43	63 9,116 competing apps Median installs: 4,038 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	592 major competitor apps
unwanted	74	100	74	62 7,803 competing apps Median installs: 6,020 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	809 major competitor apps
algorithm	74	100	40	60 6,223 competing apps Median installs: 2,584 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	309 major competitor apps
daily	67	100	55	83 170,087 competing apps Median installs: 1,465 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,784 major competitor apps
symptoms	73	100	35	56 3,124 competing apps Median installs: 2,100 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	89 major competitor apps
able	69	100	50	78 77,031 competing apps Median installs: 1,794 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,303 major competitor apps
line	71	100	49	72 35,235 competing apps Median installs: 2,439 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,050 major competitor apps
target	73	100	44	68 17,706 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	876 major competitor apps
clinicians	71	100	28	47 891 competing apps Median installs: 812 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5 major competitor apps

App Description

Guide clinicians prescribing psychotropic medications for FASD/ND-PAE patients

With the decision tree, prescribers will be able to identify one of four clusters of symptoms with which to target treatment. "Clusters" include hyperarousal, emotional dysregulation, hyperactivity/neurocognitive, and cognitive inflexibility. Once the primary cluster with the greatest impact on patient functioning is known, then the algorithm decision tree identifies a first-line and second-line medication to prescribe. An adjunct therapy is also given for each cluster. Using the decision tree will help manage FASD/ND-PAE patients improve daily function and reduce unnecessary and unwanted medication. Four to six weeks after using the decision tree, prescribers can complete a brief survey to help evaluate the effectiveness of this first-ever medication decision tree for FASD/ND-PAE patients.