EXFO RFTM

Developer: EXFO Inc.

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

2.7K installs

5.00 ratings

99 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +13

Declining

Monthly +35

Declining

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 56 keywords for EXFO RFTM in Google Play

Developer: EXFO Inc. Category: productivity

EXFO RFTM tracks 56 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 56 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 45.1.

iOLM and OTDR remote testing and management with EXFO RFTM FMS

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 56 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: hub

Avg difficulty

45.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

hub

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 310
64.0
tone

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 417
60.3
unit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 398
64.4
loss

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 645
64.5
operate

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 489
62.9

Unranked opportunities

hub

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 310
tone

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 417
unit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 398
loss

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 645
operate

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 489

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 282,302 • Major competitors: 11,193

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
designed

Total apps: 259,816 • Major competitors: 8,462

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
using

Total apps: 220,948 • Major competitors: 12,056

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
even

Total apps: 156,616 • Major competitors: 11,437

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
live

Total apps: 144,581 • Major competitors: 7,023

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
mode	69	100	56	77 69,871 competing apps Median installs: 5,244 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,824 major competitor apps
live	67	100	55	82 144,581 competing apps Median installs: 1,577 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	7,023 major competitor apps
used	68	100	54	81 115,725 competing apps Median installs: 3,159 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,071 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	54	86 259,816 competing apps Median installs: 855 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	8,462 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 111,979 competing apps Median installs: 584 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,644 major competitor apps
using	66	100	57	85 220,948 competing apps Median installs: 2,906 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	12,056 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 282,302 competing apps Median installs: 1,469 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	11,193 major competitor apps
including	67	100	55	81 128,934 competing apps Median installs: 2,591 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,557 major competitor apps
various	67	100	53	82 139,337 competing apps Median installs: 3,301 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	8,665 major competitor apps
monitor	69	100	47	77 64,655 competing apps Median installs: 609 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,789 major competitor apps
test	68	100	51	79 98,060 competing apps Median installs: 2,187 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,381 major competitor apps
tests	72	100	43	69 22,801 competing apps Median installs: 1,857 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	641 major competitor apps
type	70	100	52	75 49,774 competing apps Median installs: 3,962 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,868 major competitor apps
hub	74	100	41	64 10,535 competing apps Median installs: 553 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	310 major competitor apps
tone	74	100	42	60 6,104 competing apps Median installs: 4,273 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	417 major competitor apps
unit	74	100	42	64 11,147 competing apps Median installs: 1,427 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	398 major competitor apps
route	73	100	50	69 20,120 competing apps Median installs: 1,749 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	904 major competitor apps
solution	69	100	48	78 79,010 competing apps Median installs: 871 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,950 major competitor apps
remote	72	100	46	70 25,204 competing apps Median installs: 2,606 Avg rating: 3.6	—	—	1,204 major competitor apps
main	69	100	50	77 69,215 competing apps Median installs: 3,055 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,578 major competitor apps
field	72	100	44	71 28,375 competing apps Median installs: 1,182 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	698 major competitor apps
monitoring	72	100	43	71 27,676 competing apps Median installs: 715 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	628 major competitor apps
loss	74	100	41	65 11,320 competing apps Median installs: 2,644 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	645 major competitor apps
even	67	100	57	83 156,616 competing apps Median installs: 4,222 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	11,437 major competitor apps
turn	69	100	56	77 68,281 competing apps Median installs: 4,874 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,552 major competitor apps

App Description

iOLM and OTDR remote testing and management with EXFO RFTM FMS

This application serves as a mobile client for EXFO RFTM (formerly Nova Fiber), an optical fiber test and monitoring solution using an intelligent OTDR which you can operate on premises or through the EXFO cloud server.

The EXFO RFTM solution is designed to build, turn up, and monitor any type of fiber network, including point-to-point and PON links.

This mobile application is the field extension of EXFO RFTM. It is used by field technicians and engineers to execute various tests from an OTDR unit installed in a fixed and central location.

Testing supports running end-to-end loss tests on PONs in an FTTP context and runs the remote OTDR in tone mode on the selected route for fiber identification, even in live fiber conditions.

Field technicians can also use the app to fully characterize the distribution fibers connecting a main hub or cabinet to premises from the remote iOLM test unit.