FlixPlayer for Android
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 97 keywords for FlixPlayer for Android in Google Play
FlixPlayer for Android tracks 97 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 97 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 47.8.
Flix Player brings the Best Play Option for your Multimedia content..
Tracked keywords
97
0 ranked • 97 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: contain
Avg difficulty
47.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.7
contain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 506
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 251
- 60.5
define
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 263
- 63.1
frame
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 674
- 65.6
least
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 867
Unranked opportunities
contain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 506
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 251
define
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 263
frame
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 674
least
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Competitors: 867
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 267,605 • Major competitors: 7,566
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
best
Total apps: 255,700 • Major competitors: 16,875
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
play
Total apps: 206,993 • Major competitors: 18,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.1
different
Total apps: 187,604 • Major competitors: 13,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
support
Total apps: 171,021 • Major competitors: 7,328
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 206,993 competing apps Median installs: 6,220 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 18,537 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 255,700 competing apps Median installs: 3,148 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,875 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 109,636 competing apps Median installs: 1,857 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,418 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 75,102 competing apps Median installs: 1,821 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,982 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 171,021 competing apps Median installs: 1,243 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,328 major competitor apps |
| audio | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 67,267 competing apps Median installs: 3,261 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,221 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,684 competing apps Median installs: 1,041 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,051 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,134 competing apps Median installs: 1,238 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,071 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,605 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,566 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,806 competing apps Median installs: 1,986 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,606 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 60 | 71 29,027 competing apps Median installs: 4,381 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,191 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 82,571 competing apps Median installs: 1,952 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,303 major competitor apps |
| call | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 47,506 competing apps Median installs: 2,856 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,688 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 47,411 competing apps Median installs: 2,255 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,352 major competitor apps |
| note | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 31,943 competing apps Median installs: 3,206 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,566 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,581 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,230 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 60 | 79 86,326 competing apps Median installs: 3,947 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,111 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,457 competing apps Median installs: 2,101 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,934 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 19,680 competing apps Median installs: 2,061 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 952 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,486 competing apps Median installs: 1,961 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,797 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 59 | 78 77,594 competing apps Median installs: 3,282 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,284 major competitor apps |
| brings | 69 | 100 | 51 | 76 63,145 competing apps Median installs: 1,484 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,626 major competitor apps |
| contain | 74 | 100 | 52 | 65 11,550 competing apps Median installs: 3,642 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 506 major competitor apps |
| players | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 62,204 competing apps Median installs: 5,216 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,738 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 164,664 competing apps Median installs: 1,692 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,506 major competitor apps |
App Description
Flix Player brings the Best Play Option for your Multimedia content..
Our player and its power to be able to Play any File Format (including fotmato m3u and m3u8).
1) SUPPORT ALL VIDEO AND AUDIO FORMATS - Flix Player It is the Most Accepted Player that manages almost all the formats of Audio and Video.
2) High Technology Chromecast Support To be able to reproduce your Vines in
Supported formats
When defining the formats supported by Flix Player, it is important to keep in mind that "media formats" are in fact defined in multiple levels. From the lowest level to the highest, these are:
The format of individual media samples (for example, a video frame or an audio frame). We call these sample formats. Note that a typical video file will contain media in at least two sample formats; one for video (for example, H.264) and another for audio (for example, AAC).
The format of the container that holds the media samples and the associated metadata. We call these container formats. A media file has a single container format (eg, MP4), which is usually indicated by the file extension. Note that for some audio-only formats (eg, MP3), the sample and container formats may be the same.
Adaptive transmission technologies such as DASH, SmoothStreaming and HLS. These are not media formats as such, however, it is still necessary to define what level of support Flix Player offers.
The following sections define the Flix Player support in each level, from the highest to the lowest. Support for independent subtitle formats is also described at the bottom of this page
SCRIPT
Flix Playerr supports DASH with multiple container formats. Media streams must be displayed, which means that video, audio and text must be defined in different AdaptationSet elements in the DASH manifest (CEA-608 is an exception, more information in the table below). The sample audio and video content formats must also be compatible (see the sample formats section for more details).
Feature Supported Comment
Containers
FMP4 YES Only streams decomposed
WebM YES Only streams decomposed
Matroska YES Only streams decomposed
MPEG-TS NO No planned support
Closed captions / subtitles
TTML YES Unprocessed, or embedded in FMP4 according to ISO / IEC 14496-30
WebVTT YES Unprocessed, or embedded in FMP4 according to IS