Prysmian Group Conduit Fill
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 37 keywords for Prysmian Group Conduit Fill in Google Play
Prysmian Group Conduit Fill tracks 37 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 37 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 44.2.
Prysmian Group’s Conduit Fill calculator is an easy tool for conduit fill.
Tracked keywords
37
0 ranked • 37 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: minimum
Avg difficulty
44.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.8
minimum
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 868
- 64.8
spending
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 748
- 63.1
different types
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 713
- 59.3
ten
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 240
- 65.5
rates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 585
Unranked opportunities
minimum
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 868
spending
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 748
different types
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 713
ten
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 240
rates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 585
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 326,310 • Major competitors: 16,127
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
find
Total apps: 309,449 • Major competitors: 17,804
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
designed
Total apps: 259,816 • Major competitors: 8,462
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
without
Total apps: 210,535 • Major competitors: 11,375
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
different
Total apps: 188,814 • Major competitors: 15,089
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| easy | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 326,310 competing apps Median installs: 2,539 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 16,127 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 259,816 competing apps Median installs: 855 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,462 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 309,449 competing apps Median installs: 2,804 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17,804 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 15,721 competing apps Median installs: 3,049 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,137 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 74 | 100 | 44 | 65 11,700 competing apps Median installs: 6,071 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 868 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 33,147 competing apps Median installs: 1,668 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,447 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 102,387 competing apps Median installs: 1,350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,128 major competitor apps |
| fill | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 24,464 competing apps Median installs: 3,243 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,702 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,290 competing apps Median installs: 472 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 210,535 competing apps Median installs: 3,591 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11,375 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 144,032 competing apps Median installs: 1,479 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,896 major competitor apps |
| spending | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 11,723 competing apps Median installs: 2,358 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 748 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,953 competing apps Median installs: 1,494 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 779 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 188,814 competing apps Median installs: 5,232 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 15,089 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 64,790 competing apps Median installs: 6,463 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,752 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 22,502 competing apps Median installs: 2,899 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,262 major competitor apps |
| size | 71 | 100 | 50 | 72 35,278 competing apps Median installs: 5,877 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,098 major competitor apps |
| hours | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 57,416 competing apps Median installs: 1,503 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,921 major competitor apps |
| per | 71 | 100 | 46 | 71 30,027 competing apps Median installs: 4,396 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,680 major competitor apps |
| calculator | 73 | 100 | 45 | 69 20,587 competing apps Median installs: 1,625 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 739 major competitor apps |
| types | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 44,776 competing apps Median installs: 4,523 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,865 major competitor apps |
| fifty | 70 | 100 | 32 | 43 481 competing apps Median installs: 5,538 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| selection | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,137 competing apps Median installs: 1,893 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,508 major competitor apps |
| different types | 74 | 100 | 42 | 63 9,195 competing apps Median installs: 4,812 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| total | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 33,413 competing apps Median installs: 2,281 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,828 major competitor apps |
App Description
Prysmian Group’s Conduit Fill calculator is an easy tool for conduit fill.
Features:
Code Selection for NEC® 2011, 2014, and 2017.
Metric or standard conductors
Allowable fill rates for combination of conductors
Calculates minimum conduit size for compact stranded conductors
Over fifty different types of insulation
Over ten different conduit types
Results show total area required, nipple size, and minimum conduit size