gistalt
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 52 keywords for gistalt in Google Play
gistalt tracks 52 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 52 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 45.5.
sick or not-sick
Tracked keywords
52
0 ranked • 52 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: institute
Avg difficulty
45.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.8
institute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 66
- 63.5
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 185
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 60.0
stack
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 330
- 64.4
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 452
Unranked opportunities
institute
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 66
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 185
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
stack
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 330
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 452
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 328,331 • Major competitors: 18,397
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
designed
Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
simple
Total apps: 254,597 • Major competitors: 11,043
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
start
Total apps: 198,800 • Major competitors: 11,826
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
see
Total apps: 165,283 • Major competitors: 7,601
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| card | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 69,238 competing apps Median installs: 3,586 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,671 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 158,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,615 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,097 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 328,331 competing apps Median installs: 2,060 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 18,397 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 7,629 major competitor apps |
| institute | 74 | 100 | 37 | 62 7,552 competing apps Median installs: 503 Avg rating: 1.5 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| treated | 72 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,751 competing apps Median installs: 924 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| goal | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 42,720 competing apps Median installs: 1,164 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,784 major competitor apps |
| swipe | 72 | 100 | 51 | 69 22,302 competing apps Median installs: 3,417 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,528 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 53 | 74 41,785 competing apps Median installs: 3,572 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,369 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 2,121 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,024 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 42,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,496 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,894 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 9,712 competing apps Median installs: 671 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 198,800 competing apps Median installs: 2,321 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,826 major competitor apps |
| immediate | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 14,776 competing apps Median installs: 910 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 461 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,651 competing apps Median installs: 540 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 56 | 86 254,597 competing apps Median installs: 1,723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 11,043 major competitor apps |
| playing | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 56,748 competing apps Median installs: 8,996 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,884 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 165,283 competing apps Median installs: 1,704 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,601 major competitor apps |
| next | 69 | 100 | 55 | 79 87,064 competing apps Median installs: 1,762 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,136 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 25,419 competing apps Median installs: 1,277 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 994 major competitor apps |
| stack | 74 | 100 | 42 | 60 5,816 competing apps Median installs: 1,942 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 330 major competitor apps |
| accurately | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,993 competing apps Median installs: 1,529 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| safely | 73 | 100 | 57 | 67 16,287 competing apps Median installs: 2,084 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 961 major competitor apps |
| review | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 50,651 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,735 major competitor apps |
| conditions | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 18,402 competing apps Median installs: 3,536 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,034 major competitor apps |
App Description
sick or not-sick
Your goal playing gistalt is to accurately identify which patients are sick (requiring hospitalization or immediate interventions for stabilization) or not-sick (conditions that can be safely treated with outpatient follow-up).
gistalt games are simple and fun. You'll start with a stack of patient presentations including vital signs, laboratory results and imaging. Swipe each card left (for not-sick) or right (for-sick) to see the next question. At the end of the stack, review your responses and see your score. Your gistalt score specially gauges your ability to detect the most critically-ill patients and institute the treatments that will make a difference.
New questions are added regularly and don't require an app update.