VendettaMark Ignition
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 135 keywords for VendettaMark Ignition in Google Play
VendettaMark Ignition tracks 135 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 135 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 44.5.
VendettaMark™ Ignition is a cross-platform performance testing benchmark.
Tracked keywords
135
0 ranked • 135 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: ios
Avg difficulty
44.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.0
ios
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 313
- 59.9
output
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 259
- 61.3
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 341
- 66.2
meaning
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 411
- 62.7
asset
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 265
Unranked opportunities
ios
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Competitors: 313
output
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 259
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 341
meaning
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 411
asset
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 265
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
like
Total apps: 289,444 • Major competitors: 20,631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
mobile
Total apps: 280,792 • Major competitors: 10,253
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
every
Total apps: 259,302 • Major competitors: 13,137
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
available
Total apps: 199,899 • Major competitors: 9,729
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,681 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,239 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| choose | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 195,566 competing apps Median installs: 2,302 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 12,116 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,899 competing apps Median installs: 2,015 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,792 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,253 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 38,278 competing apps Median installs: 2,606 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,721 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,737 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,222 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,573 competing apps Median installs: 2,109 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,950 major competitor apps |
| tests | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,887 competing apps Median installs: 1,590 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 591 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 88,486 competing apps Median installs: 2,925 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,726 major competitor apps |
| ios | 74 | 100 | 52 | 61 6,768 competing apps Median installs: 1,918 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 313 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 165,549 competing apps Median installs: 4,224 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 10,524 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,635 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,467 major competitor apps |
| visual | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 44,021 competing apps Median installs: 1,487 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,060 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 65,936 competing apps Median installs: 861 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,827 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 289,444 competing apps Median installs: 3,592 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 20,631 major competitor apps |
| session | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 15,379 competing apps Median installs: 590 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 448 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 164,775 competing apps Median installs: 1,699 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,524 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 53,362 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,595 major competitor apps |
| output | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 5,742 competing apps Median installs: 2,807 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,165 competing apps Median installs: 2,826 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,083 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 259,302 competing apps Median installs: 1,997 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 13,137 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 53,024 competing apps Median installs: 2,847 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,343 major competitor apps |
App Description
VendettaMark™ Ignition is a cross-platform performance testing benchmark.
The threaded renderer and rigorous benchmark makes every effort to replicate the actual types of gameplay loads incurred from running a heavy session of Vendetta Online, including intensive threaded physics simulations, sound, even I/O testing (an important component of texture and asset streaming).
VendettaMark™ then delivers the same unified suite of comparable benchmark tests across the following platforms and graphics APIs:
Windows (x86-64, DirectX 11)
MacOS X (x86-64, OpenGL)
Linux (x86-64, OpenGL)
Android (ARM64, OpenGL ES 3.0)
iOS (ARM64, OpenGL ES 3.0)
All versions utilize the same basic rendering architecture and identical shaders, implemented as closely as possible within the respective graphics APIs. All versions output graphically to an off-screen buffer that is re-scaled and flipped back to the main display for visual verification.
This also means the benchmark only runs at fixed, pre-determined resolutions, of 1080p and 4K UHD (2160p), both of which are tested during the benchmark process (output is rendered to full 1080p and 4K, but will be re-scaled to the display resolution when shown on-screen). Testing at fixed resolutions is intended to improve the comparability of different devices and systems across multiple architectures. Similarly, it removes the "screen resolution" from impacting mobile results, and we consider it the most relevant cross-platform testing choice.
VendettaMark 2018 is a fixed-timestep benchmark, meaning that all hardware will render the same number of frames, but the length of time to render each frame is measured and accumulated to determine the "score".
The website offers zoomable graphs of your benchmark run, if you choose to submit your data. From this, you can then see the individual frame-times graphed in milliseconds per frame, along with other information. This is intended to enable many interesting performance tuning and debugging possibilites, like correlating a sudden drop in performance with an increase in CPU or GPU temperature. We intend to expand on the available feature-set as time goes on.