Drywall Materials Calculator

Developer: H3 Apps

Category: House & Home

Add App to Comparison

73 installs

Ratings not yet available

5.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +2.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 43 keywords for Drywall Materials Calculator in Google Play

Developer: H3 Apps Category: house_and_home

Drywall Materials Calculator tracks 43 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 43 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 40.6.

This app will estimate the drywall panels needed to cover a room.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 43 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.3

Top keyword: square

Avg difficulty

40.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

square

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 521
63.7
applied

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 381
62.9
length

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 341
61.3
vary

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 71.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 458
60.9
estimate

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 191
59.8

Unranked opportunities

square

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 521
applied

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 381
length

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 341
vary

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 71.0 • Competitors: 458
estimate

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 191

High competition keywords

different

Total apps: 187,624 • Major competitors: 13,693

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
number

Total apps: 96,178 • Major competitors: 5,083

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
well

Total apps: 92,173 • Major competitors: 3,591

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
may

Total apps: 88,273 • Major competitors: 4,559

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
includes

Total apps: 66,409 • Major competitors: 2,546

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
width	71	100	34	50 1,282 competing apps Median installs: 3,355 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	77 major competitor apps
lightweight	73	100	46	68 17,525 competing apps Median installs: 1,314 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	664 major competitor apps
imperial	72	100	32	51 1,688 competing apps Median installs: 2,004 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	88 major competitor apps
needed	73	100	46	68 19,177 competing apps Median installs: 1,716 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	816 major competitor apps
applied	74	100	43	63 8,912 competing apps Median installs: 4,328 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	381 major competitor apps
length	74	100	39	61 7,042 competing apps Median installs: 2,330 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	341 major competitor apps
meters	72	100	45	53 1,983 competing apps Median installs: 1,563 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	47 major competitor apps
includes	69	100	50	77 66,409 competing apps Median installs: 2,083 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,546 major competitor apps
two	70	100	50	76 57,924 competing apps Median installs: 2,868 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,986 major competitor apps
different	66	100	58	84 187,624 competing apps Median installs: 4,008 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	13,693 major competitor apps
joint	73	100	36	57 3,592 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	179 major competitor apps
requires	71	100	49	71 30,683 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,407 major competitor apps
naturally	73	100	37	58 4,082 competing apps Median installs: 1,358 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	172 major competitor apps
amount	72	100	47	70 24,975 competing apps Median installs: 5,026 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,403 major competitor apps
well	68	100	51	79 92,173 competing apps Median installs: 2,076 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,591 major competitor apps
square	75	100	42	64 10,065 competing apps Median installs: 813 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	521 major competitor apps
number	68	100	53	79 96,178 competing apps Median installs: 2,652 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,083 major competitor apps
per	71	100	47	71 30,219 competing apps Median installs: 3,238 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,572 major competitor apps
vary	74	100	71	61 6,649 competing apps Median installs: 4,163 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	458 major competitor apps
room	72	100	46	69 21,321 competing apps Median installs: 2,652 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,547 major competitor apps
estimate	74	100	37	60 5,679 competing apps Median installs: 1,632 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	191 major competitor apps
may	68	100	60	79 88,273 competing apps Median installs: 2,780 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	4,559 major competitor apps
compound	72	100	33	52 1,773 competing apps Median installs: 2,862 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	93 major competitor apps
cover	73	100	45	67 16,470 competing apps Median installs: 3,483 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	849 major competitor apps
covers	74	100	42	66 14,458 competing apps Median installs: 1,943 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	416 major competitor apps

App Description

This app will estimate the drywall panels needed to cover a room.

'This app will use the dimensions of a rectangular room to estimate the number of drywall panels needed to cover the room, as well as the amount of tape, lightweight joint compound, and number of nails needed. It includes both Imperial and Metric measurements.

The tape length needed is computed as the number of panels multiplied by the sum of the panel’s width and length. When Metric is selected, the panel dimensions are in meters, so the tape length is naturally in meters.

For the amount of lightweight joint compound for Imperial, we assume 1 gallon covers 160 square feet per coat. For metric, we assume 1 liter covers 4.4 square meters per coat. Two coats are applied in both cases.

A common estimate is that each 4X8 ft panel requires about 32 nails. For different sizes, the number may vary slightly.