Productive Team
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 73 keywords for Productive Team in Google Play
Productive Team tracks 73 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 73 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 45.2.
Productive Team allows a team leader to record time & production per team.
Tracked keywords
73
0 ranked • 73 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: entry
Avg difficulty
45.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.5
entry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 353
- 62.7
wireless
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 513
- 65.8
recorded
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 506
- 61.6
leader
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 498
- 66.1
employee
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 185
Unranked opportunities
entry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 353
wireless
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Competitors: 513
recorded
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 506
leader
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 498
employee
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 185
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 383,211 • Major competitors: 17,726
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
make
Total apps: 326,434 • Major competitors: 20,160
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
information
Total apps: 268,463 • Major competitors: 8,219
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
designed
Total apps: 260,108 • Major competitors: 8,465
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
simple
Total apps: 258,726 • Major competitors: 12,317
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 112,732 competing apps Median installs: 4,203 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7,052 major competitor apps |
| mode | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 69,542 competing apps Median installs: 5,244 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,795 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 326,434 competing apps Median installs: 2,530 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 20,160 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 81,984 competing apps Median installs: 2,170 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,361 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 268,463 competing apps Median installs: 1,201 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,219 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 86,017 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,232 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,888 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,095 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,108 competing apps Median installs: 843 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,465 major competitor apps |
| productive | 73 | 100 | 61 | 59 5,080 competing apps Median installs: 893 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 383,211 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 17,726 major competitor apps |
| pay | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 71,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,701 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,085 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 41,521 competing apps Median installs: 4,589 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,601 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 131,625 competing apps Median installs: 2,903 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,050 major competitor apps |
| never | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 118,195 competing apps Median installs: 2,058 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7,133 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 69,355 competing apps Median installs: 424 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,699 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 197,179 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,266 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 170,538 competing apps Median installs: 2,482 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 9,567 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 28,737 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,130 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 96,975 competing apps Median installs: 4,251 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,355 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 258,726 competing apps Median installs: 2,076 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 12,317 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 67,526 competing apps Median installs: 1,848 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,175 major competitor apps |
| personal | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 157,399 competing apps Median installs: 1,384 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7,227 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 66,527 competing apps Median installs: 942 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,000 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,280 competing apps Median installs: 1,466 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,479 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 122,447 competing apps Median installs: 1,894 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,297 major competitor apps |
App Description
Productive Team allows a team leader to record time & production per team.
The Productive Team app can be used in team or personal mode. With team mode a supervisor records labor for per team. In personal model each employee records their own labor.
The app allows the supervisor or employee to track activities for one or multiple employees at once. Additional information to complete an entry can be added easily.
The App works offline and synchronizes when in reach of the (Wifi) network. Therefore the app is great addition to the existing fixed terminal and wireless handheld that can be used as a data collector for Ridder Productive.
Productive Team is part of our Ridder Productive labor tracking and production solution. With Productive, work processes can be optimized by gaining insight, motivating employees with performance pay and having real-time information to make better decisions and reduce feedback cycles.
Productive 2019 is required to be able to use this app.