Pocket Appendicitis Score

Developer: iMedical Apps

Category: Medical

1.1K installs

ratings

+1 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 78 keywords for Pocket Appendicitis Score in Google Play

Developer: iMedical Apps Category: medical

Pocket Appendicitis Score tracks 78 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 78 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 46.4.

Diagnosing acute appendicitis with AIR score, Alvarado score, and RIPASA score

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 78 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.6

Top keyword: air

Avg difficulty

46.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

air

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,351
67.6
similar

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,267
67.9
intended

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 786
67.7
external

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 869
65.6
medical

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 802
70.2

Unranked opportunities

air

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 1,351
similar

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Competitors: 1,267
intended

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Competitors: 786
external

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Competitors: 869
medical

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802

High competition keywords

easy

Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
download

Total apps: 139,812 • Major competitors: 15,046

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
help

Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
features

Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
download	65	100	60	88 139,812 competing apps Median installs: 34,022 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	15,046 major competitor apps
right	67	100	66	83 68,533 competing apps Median installs: 35,866 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	8,317 major competitor apps
single	69	100	56	77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,952 major competitor apps
easy	64	100	62	89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	17,537 major competitor apps
external	72	100	55	66 6,882 competing apps Median installs: 37,392 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	869 major competitor apps
medical	72	100	45	70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	802 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
help	65	100	66	87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,840 major competitor apps
score	71	100	52	72 16,635 competing apps Median installs: 29,493 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,927 major competitor apps
visit	70	100	57	75 23,850 competing apps Median installs: 31,586 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,738 major competitor apps
patients	71	100	39	60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	203 major competitor apps
validation	69	100	32	49 773 competing apps Median installs: 21,536 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	46 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	60	83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,088 major competitor apps
patient	71	100	38	61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	190 major competitor apps
easily	66	100	65	85 96,583 competing apps Median installs: 32,526 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,194 major competitor apps
simple	66	100	59	86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,187 major competitor apps
work	68	100	61	81 52,752 competing apps Median installs: 28,708 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,048 major competitor apps
guide	70	100	49	76 27,742 competing apps Median installs: 22,659 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,061 major competitor apps
must	69	100	52	77 31,973 competing apps Median installs: 36,460 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,575 major competitor apps
useful	70	100	50	76 27,683 competing apps Median installs: 33,574 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,561 major competitor apps
calculation	72	100	43	64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	344 major competitor apps
features	65	100	65	87 116,743 competing apps Median installs: 36,428 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	14,116 major competitor apps
come	70	100	54	76 28,035 competing apps Median installs: 48,164 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,239 major competitor apps

App Description

Diagnosing acute appendicitis with AIR score, Alvarado score, and RIPASA score

“Pocket Appendicitis Score - AIR, Alvarado, RIPASA Score" is a mobile app that use several scorings (appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score, Alvarado score, and RIPASA score) to diagnose acute appendicitis based on clinical and laboratory findings. "Pocket Appendicitis Score - AIR, Alvarado, RIPASA Score" app is intended to help medical practitioner, especially in surgery department, to diagnose patients with suspicion of appendicitis who come to emergency department with acute right abdominal pain.

There are several features of "Pocket Appendicitis Score - AIR, Alvarado, RIPASA Score", namely:
🔸 Simple and very easy to use.
🔸 Precise calculation with appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score.
🔸 Simple scoring calculation with Alvarado score.
🔸 More sensitive scoring in Asian population by using RIPASA score.
🔸 Useful in emergency department to work up patient with acute abdominal pain.
🔸 It is totally free. Download now!

Appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score has been used in both paediatric and adult patients with large external validation study. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score is also said to be more superior compared to Alvarado score. Alvarado score also predicts likelihood of appendicitis diagnosis. The Alvarado Score was initially described in 1986 by Dr. Alfredo Alvarado in a retrospective single centre study in Philadelphia. It is one of the most commonly used formula to diagnose appendicitis nowadays. While RIPASA score is similar to both AIR score and Alvarado score. It typically provides a quantitive value for a clinician's clinical gestalt of appendicitis. It has been most widely studied in Asian populations (Singapore, India) and less so in Western populations. In "Pocket Appendicitis Score - AIR, Alvarado, RIPASA Score" app, you can easily predict appendicitis with AIR score, Alvarado score, and RIPASA score.

All calculations must be re-checked and should not be used alone to guide patient care, nor should they substitute for clinical judgment. For more info, visit us at www.imedical-apps.com.