Pulmonary Embolism Score
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for Pulmonary Embolism Score in Google Play
Pulmonary Embolism Score tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 41.7.
Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: doctor
Avg difficulty
41.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
doctor
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 563
- 63.4
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
- 65.0
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 586
Unranked opportunities
doctor
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 563
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 195
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 202
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 381
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 586
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 338,560 • Major competitors: 17,497
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
easy
Total apps: 326,565 • Major competitors: 16,152
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
help
Total apps: 283,445 • Major competitors: 15,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
mobile
Total apps: 281,737 • Major competitors: 11,159
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
designed
Total apps: 259,979 • Major competitors: 8,462
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 338,560 competing apps Median installs: 2,109 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17,497 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 69,944 competing apps Median installs: 771 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,975 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 326,565 competing apps Median installs: 2,519 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 16,152 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,833 competing apps Median installs: 3,149 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,092 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 259,979 competing apps Median installs: 841 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,462 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 34,549 competing apps Median installs: 2,425 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 2,160 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 221,131 competing apps Median installs: 2,891 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 12,080 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 281,737 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11,159 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 283,445 competing apps Median installs: 2,020 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 15,667 major competitor apps |
| score | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 42,919 competing apps Median installs: 1,541 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,050 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 43 | 57 3,882 competing apps Median installs: 1,836 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,664 competing apps Median installs: 746 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| exam | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 32,726 competing apps Median installs: 1,217 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 414 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,729 competing apps Median installs: 605 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 258,766 competing apps Median installs: 2,077 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 12,322 major competitor apps |
| apply | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 44,277 competing apps Median installs: 6,299 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,273 major competitor apps |
| always | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 141,759 competing apps Median installs: 1,749 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6,547 major competitor apps |
| guide | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 72,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,221 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 58,104 competing apps Median installs: 3,989 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 3,320 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,632 competing apps Median installs: 2,008 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 381 major competitor apps |
| probability | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,255 competing apps Median installs: 4,788 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| features | 66 | 100 | 58 | 86 255,212 competing apps Median installs: 2,705 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 15,215 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 188,377 competing apps Median installs: 5,216 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 15,069 major competitor apps |
| precise | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 24,701 competing apps Median installs: 1,167 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,293 major competitor apps |
| decision | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,169 competing apps Median installs: 1,827 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 586 major competitor apps |
App Description
Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule
There are several features of "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule", namely:
🔸 Simple and very easy to use.
🔸 Precise calculation with Wells criteria or Wells score.
🔸 Simple and straightforward calculation of GENEVA score.
🔸 PERC rule for ruling out pulmonary embolism.
🔸 Risk calculation of acute pulmonary embolism in a patient with dyspnea or shortness of breath
🔸 It is totally free. Download now!
Aside from Wells score, “Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule” app also has other scores, namely GENEVA score and PERC rule. The Revised GENEVA scores, along with the Wells score are the most commonly used scores to evaluate for pulmonary embolism. Some physicians prefer the Revised Geneva score because of its objectivity While in the patient considered low-risk of pulmonary embolism, PERC rule may help avoid further testing.
Disclaimer: All calculations must be re-checked and should not be used alone to guide patient care, nor should they substitute for clinical judgment. Calculations in this "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule" app might be different from your local practice. Consult with an expert doctor whenever necessary.
