Pulmonary Embolism Score
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for Pulmonary Embolism Score in Google Play
Pulmonary Embolism Score tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 41.8.
Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: patients
Avg difficulty
41.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 198
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 200
- 65.1
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 375
- 64.6
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 567
- 61.6
prior
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 428
Unranked opportunities
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 198
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 200
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 375
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 567
prior
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 428
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 330,784 • Major competitors: 16,343
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
download
Total apps: 325,905 • Major competitors: 17,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
mobile
Total apps: 280,391 • Major competitors: 11,045
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
help
Total apps: 277,760 • Major competitors: 15,480
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed
Total apps: 263,922 • Major competitors: 8,522
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 325,905 competing apps Median installs: 2,132 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 17,000 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 68,555 competing apps Median installs: 768 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,950 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 330,784 competing apps Median installs: 2,433 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 16,343 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,104 competing apps Median installs: 3,078 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,201 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 263,922 competing apps Median installs: 794 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,522 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 35,001 competing apps Median installs: 2,292 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,175 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,230 competing apps Median installs: 2,814 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,284 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,391 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,045 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 277,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,034 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 15,480 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 48 | 74 41,419 competing apps Median installs: 1,558 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,014 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 43 | 57 3,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,843 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 9,758 competing apps Median installs: 725 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| exam | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 32,085 competing apps Median installs: 1,210 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 404 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,565 competing apps Median installs: 599 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 200 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 250,065 competing apps Median installs: 2,080 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,095 major competitor apps |
| apply | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 43,573 competing apps Median installs: 6,270 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,234 major competitor apps |
| always | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 143,811 competing apps Median installs: 1,701 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,667 major competitor apps |
| guide | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 70,570 competing apps Median installs: 1,422 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,179 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 58,713 competing apps Median installs: 3,892 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,361 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,196 competing apps Median installs: 2,053 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 375 major competitor apps |
| probability | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,192 competing apps Median installs: 5,014 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| features | 66 | 100 | 58 | 86 250,296 competing apps Median installs: 2,691 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 15,009 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 185,538 competing apps Median installs: 5,259 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 14,951 major competitor apps |
| precise | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 23,729 competing apps Median installs: 1,125 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,247 major competitor apps |
| decision | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 11,251 competing apps Median installs: 1,955 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 567 major competitor apps |
App Description
Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule
There are several features of "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule", namely:
🔸 Simple and very easy to use.
🔸 Precise calculation with Wells criteria or Wells score.
🔸 Simple and straightforward calculation of GENEVA score.
🔸 PERC rule for ruling out pulmonary embolism.
🔸 Risk calculation of acute pulmonary embolism in a patient with dyspnea or shortness of breath
🔸 It is totally free. Download now!
Aside from Wells score, “Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule” app also has other scores, namely GENEVA score and PERC rule. The Revised GENEVA scores, along with the Wells score are the most commonly used scores to evaluate for pulmonary embolism. Some physicians prefer the Revised Geneva score because of its objectivity While in the patient considered low-risk of pulmonary embolism, PERC rule may help avoid further testing.
Disclaimer: All calculations must be re-checked and should not be used alone to guide patient care, nor should they substitute for clinical judgment. Calculations in this "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule" app might be different from your local practice. Consult with an expert doctor whenever necessary.
