Pulmonary Embolism Score

Pulmonary Embolism Score
Pulmonary Embolism Score
Developer: iMedical Apps
Category: Medical
3K installs
Ratings not yet available
+3 monthly installs
trend steady
Pulmonary Embolism Score icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 76 keywords for Pulmonary Embolism Score in Google Play

Developer: iMedical Apps Category: medical

Pulmonary Embolism Score tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 44.6.

Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule

Tracked keywords

76

0  ranked •  76  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.5

Top keyword: might

Avg difficulty

44.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • might

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 58.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,378

    68.2
  • exam

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 369

    69.5
  • calculation

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 344

    63.6
  • precise

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,101

    67.2
  • decision

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 470

    62.3

Unranked opportunities

  • might

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 58.7 • Competitors: 1,378

  • exam

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 369

  • calculation

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 344

  • precise

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 1,101

  • decision

    Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 470

High competition keywords

  • easy

    Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7

  • download

    Total apps: 139,812 • Major competitors: 15,046

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8

  • help

    Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0

  • features

    Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6

  • using

    Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
download651006088

139,812 competing apps

Median installs: 34,022

Avg rating: 2.9

15,046

major competitor apps

health701005275

23,713 competing apps

Median installs: 25,526

Avg rating: 2.7

1,845

major competitor apps

easy641006289

161,730 competing apps

Median installs: 33,636

Avg rating: 2.8

17,537

major competitor apps

used671006182

61,233 competing apps

Median installs: 32,225

Avg rating: 2.8

5,711

major competitor apps

designed661005785

96,808 competing apps

Median installs: 27,484

Avg rating: 2.8

9,110

major competitor apps

avoid711006172

16,708 competing apps

Median installs: 44,275

Avg rating: 2.9

2,344

major competitor apps

using651006486

114,758 competing apps

Median installs: 37,480

Avg rating: 2.8

13,323

major competitor apps

mobile651006086

113,294 competing apps

Median installs: 25,796

Avg rating: 2.8

10,537

major competitor apps

help651006687

123,065 competing apps

Median installs: 36,787

Avg rating: 3.0

14,840

major competitor apps

score711005272

16,635 competing apps

Median installs: 29,493

Avg rating: 3.0

1,927

major competitor apps

diagnostic701005355

1,622 competing apps

Median installs: 19,557

Avg rating: 2.6

105

major competitor apps

patients711003960

3,336 competing apps

Median installs: 19,052

Avg rating: 2.6

203

major competitor apps

exam721004370

11,750 competing apps

Median installs: 16,985

Avg rating: 2.1

369

major competitor apps

patient711003861

3,718 competing apps

Median installs: 18,204

Avg rating: 2.6

190

major competitor apps

simple661005986

106,353 competing apps

Median installs: 32,331

Avg rating: 2.8

11,187

major competitor apps

apply701005575

24,305 competing apps

Median installs: 42,318

Avg rating: 3.0

3,025

major competitor apps

always671005982

65,220 competing apps

Median installs: 32,990

Avg rating: 2.9

7,264

major competitor apps

guide701004976

27,742 competing apps

Median installs: 22,659

Avg rating: 2.7

2,061

major competitor apps

must691005277

31,973 competing apps

Median installs: 36,460

Avg rating: 2.9

3,575

major competitor apps

calculation721004364

5,305 competing apps

Median installs: 28,825

Avg rating: 2.5

344

major competitor apps

probability701003452

1,143 competing apps

Median installs: 39,660

Avg rating: 2.8

104

major competitor apps

features651006587

116,743 competing apps

Median installs: 36,428

Avg rating: 2.9

14,116

major competitor apps

different661006285

100,748 competing apps

Median installs: 49,942

Avg rating: 3.0

14,575

major competitor apps

precise721005267

8,611 competing apps

Median installs: 36,414

Avg rating: 2.9

1,101

major competitor apps

decision721004262

4,410 competing apps

Median installs: 35,836

Avg rating: 2.9

470

major competitor apps

76 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule

"Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule" is a mobile app designed to help health practitioner to determine the risk of pulmonary embolism by using the Wells criteria or Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule. The Wells criteria for pulmonary embolism is a risk stratification score and clinical decision rule to estimate the probability for acute pulmonary embolism in patients in which history and examination suggest acute pulmonary embolism is a diagnostic possibility. As with all clinical decision aids, the physician must first have a suspicion of the diagnosis before attempting to apply the Wells criteria. History taking and exam should always be performed prior to using the "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule" app.

There are several features of "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule", namely:
🔸 Simple and very easy to use.
🔸 Precise calculation with Wells criteria or Wells score.
🔸 Simple and straightforward calculation of GENEVA score.
🔸 PERC rule for ruling out pulmonary embolism.
🔸 Risk calculation of acute pulmonary embolism in a patient with dyspnea or shortness of breath
🔸 It is totally free. Download now!

Aside from Wells score, “Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule” app also has other scores, namely GENEVA score and PERC rule. The Revised GENEVA scores, along with the Wells score are the most commonly used scores to evaluate for pulmonary embolism. Some physicians prefer the Revised Geneva score because of its objectivity While in the patient considered low-risk of pulmonary embolism, PERC rule may help avoid further testing.

Disclaimer: All calculations must be re-checked and should not be used alone to guide patient care, nor should they substitute for clinical judgment. Calculations in this "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule" app might be different from your local practice. Consult with an expert doctor whenever necessary.