Pulmonary Embolism Score
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for Pulmonary Embolism Score in Google Play
Pulmonary Embolism Score tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 44.6.
Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: might
Avg difficulty
44.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.2
might
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 58.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,378
- 69.5
exam
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 369
- 63.6
calculation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 344
- 67.2
precise
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,101
- 62.3
decision
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 470
Unranked opportunities
might
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 58.7 • Competitors: 1,378
exam
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 369
calculation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 344
precise
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 1,101
decision
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 470
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
download
Total apps: 139,812 • Major competitors: 15,046
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
features
Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 60 | 88 139,812 competing apps Median installs: 34,022 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,046 major competitor apps |
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| easy | 64 | 100 | 62 | 89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 17,537 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 71 | 100 | 61 | 72 16,708 competing apps Median installs: 44,275 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,344 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,635 competing apps Median installs: 29,493 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,927 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 70 | 100 | 53 | 55 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 19,557 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| patients | 71 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| exam | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 11,750 competing apps Median installs: 16,985 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 369 major competitor apps |
| patient | 71 | 100 | 38 | 61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 106,353 competing apps Median installs: 32,331 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,187 major competitor apps |
| apply | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 24,305 competing apps Median installs: 42,318 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,025 major competitor apps |
| always | 67 | 100 | 59 | 82 65,220 competing apps Median installs: 32,990 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 7,264 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 27,742 competing apps Median installs: 22,659 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,061 major competitor apps |
| must | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 31,973 competing apps Median installs: 36,460 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,575 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 43 | 64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| probability | 70 | 100 | 34 | 52 1,143 competing apps Median installs: 39,660 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 104 major competitor apps |
| features | 65 | 100 | 65 | 87 116,743 competing apps Median installs: 36,428 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 14,116 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,575 major competitor apps |
| precise | 72 | 100 | 52 | 67 8,611 competing apps Median installs: 36,414 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,101 major competitor apps |
| decision | 72 | 100 | 42 | 62 4,410 competing apps Median installs: 35,836 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
App Description
Determine pulmonary embolism risk with Wells score, GENEVA score, and PERC rule
There are several features of "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule", namely:
🔸 Simple and very easy to use.
🔸 Precise calculation with Wells criteria or Wells score.
🔸 Simple and straightforward calculation of GENEVA score.
🔸 PERC rule for ruling out pulmonary embolism.
🔸 Risk calculation of acute pulmonary embolism in a patient with dyspnea or shortness of breath
🔸 It is totally free. Download now!
Aside from Wells score, “Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule” app also has other scores, namely GENEVA score and PERC rule. The Revised GENEVA scores, along with the Wells score are the most commonly used scores to evaluate for pulmonary embolism. Some physicians prefer the Revised Geneva score because of its objectivity While in the patient considered low-risk of pulmonary embolism, PERC rule may help avoid further testing.
Disclaimer: All calculations must be re-checked and should not be used alone to guide patient care, nor should they substitute for clinical judgment. Calculations in this "Pulmonary Embolism Score: Wells, GENEVA, PERC rule" app might be different from your local practice. Consult with an expert doctor whenever necessary.
