الفا 7

Developer: Mohamed Ibrahim Mostafa

Category: Business

Add App to Comparison

13 installs

ratings

+1.00 weekly installs

trend steady

+1.00 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 36 keywords for الفا 7 in Google Play

Developer: Mohamed Ibrahim Mostafa Category: business

الفا 7 tracks 36 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 36 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 46.0.

The customer simply makes the transfer and uploads proof of payment within the application.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 36 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.3

Top keyword: wallet

Avg difficulty

46.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

wallet

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 789
65.0
maintaining

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 309
63.8
supporting

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 454
65.7
transfers

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 561
62.0
funds

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 566
64.9

Unranked opportunities

wallet

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 789
maintaining

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 309
supporting

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 454
transfers

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Competitors: 561
funds

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 566

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 333,742 • Major competitors: 12,335

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
view

Total apps: 180,002 • Major competitors: 6,118

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
via

Total apps: 117,384 • Major competitors: 4,680

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
makes

Total apps: 114,388 • Major competitors: 5,096

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
within

Total apps: 103,967 • Major competitors: 4,171

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
customer	69	100	50	78 73,222 competing apps Median installs: 947 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	2,943 major competitor apps
via	68	100	53	81 117,384 competing apps Median installs: 1,790 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	4,680 major competitor apps
within	68	100	51	80 103,967 competing apps Median installs: 1,511 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	4,171 major competitor apps
simply	69	100	49	79 84,794 competing apps Median installs: 1,641 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	3,841 major competitor apps
collection	68	100	51	80 98,541 competing apps Median installs: 3,786 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	4,546 major competitor apps
payment	69	100	50	78 80,269 competing apps Median installs: 989 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,427 major competitor apps
process	70	100	48	76 55,954 competing apps Median installs: 997 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,908 major competitor apps
access	65	100	59	88 333,742 competing apps Median installs: 1,158 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	12,335 major competitor apps
customers	70	100	47	76 57,961 competing apps Median installs: 654 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,684 major competitor apps
view	66	100	55	84 180,002 competing apps Median installs: 912 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	6,118 major competitor apps
business	68	100	50	79 87,867 competing apps Median installs: 832 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,012 major competitor apps
uploads	71	100	32	50 1,397 competing apps Median installs: 561 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	46 major competitor apps
manual	73	100	46	69 20,161 competing apps Median installs: 1,294 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	802 major competitor apps
transfer	72	100	51	71 27,525 competing apps Median installs: 3,529 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,885 major competitor apps
owners	73	100	42	67 15,274 competing apps Median installs: 839 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	250 major competitor apps
wallet	74	100	45	65 11,925 competing apps Median installs: 3,277 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	789 major competitor apps
streamline	73	100	41	68 18,109 competing apps Median installs: 162 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	188 major competitor apps
upload	71	100	53	72 35,160 competing apps Median installs: 1,675 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,697 major competitor apps
maintaining	74	100	40	64 10,056 competing apps Median installs: 551 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	309 major competitor apps
supporting	74	100	42	66 13,313 competing apps Median installs: 1,024 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	454 major competitor apps
system	68	100	52	80 99,067 competing apps Median installs: 1,401 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	3,816 major competitor apps
transfers	74	100	47	62 7,769 competing apps Median installs: 4,147 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	561 major competitor apps
screenshot	73	100	61	56 3,346 competing apps Median installs: 1,799 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	223 major competitor apps
organized	71	100	51	72 34,283 competing apps Median installs: 671 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	912 major competitor apps
funds	74	100	41	65 11,768 competing apps Median installs: 3,112 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	566 major competitor apps

App Description

The customer simply makes the transfer and uploads proof of payment within the application.

Through the app, customers can access their accounts, view outstanding balances, and then manually transfer funds via their wallet or bank account. Afterward, they can upload a screenshot as proof of the transfer within the app.

The app aims to streamline the manual collection process between business owners and their customers, while maintaining a well-organized system for all transfers and supporting documentation to prevent errors and delays.